It’s about white supremacy —. Umm… I thought that was obvious.
My link isn’t about trying to condemn Jews, but Carleas brought up the point that people have been mixing up Judaism with Jewishness —- the link I gave is the best I could find, and it doesn’t really resolve the issue. It’s a good read though for that specific topic — ignore it if you want!
Because this forum censors on the basis of what is said about them, and not about any other group. Perhaps the Muslims are currently another protected group.
Because it is at the core of Americanism and its projection of power across the globe.
Because Judeo-Christianity is the foundation of western psychology, and its current sense of identity.
Because it is at the source of corrupting language, triggering, and mass mind control.
Because criticizing Israel is now illegal in the US, and signing a paper agreeing not to, is necessary to become a member of the establishment.
Because if you do not understand this then you cannot understand the US and why it is hated by the rest of the world. You certainly will not understand Putin’s alternative.
Shall I go on?
Well, you had so much in common.
They believed in god’s absoluteness determining all, on average; you believe in the universe, and absolute order determining all.
You admired their impressive black dicks; they admired your impressive black, nihilistic, attitude.
And you were all innocent. Aren’t all inmates innocent victims of da man, or the system, or racism, or conventional sexual hang-ups?
Your differences were a matter of interpretation.
Semantics, really.
You tell me Aegean. One the one hand, it’s a religion, on the other, it has distinct inherited physical characteristics.
Again, it doesn’t require debunking “Evolution Theory”. Humans are a single species (people of all races can mate a produce fertile offspring), and whatever the genetic correlates of intelligence, we have very little understanding of what they are, how and why they contribute to intelligence, or how they’re distributed in populations. We also know that, whatever else affects it, environment plays a large role, e.g. the Flynn Effect in the west over the past couple generations is largely attributable to the decrease in lead exposure. That tells us 1) a persons genetics provide at best a distribution of possible outcomes, and 2) whatever we think we know about genetics as it relates to intelligence is confounded by different environmental factors that are difficult if not impossible to control for. We also know that genetic variation within populations varies, e.g. Europeans have much less variation than Africans, so that, again, generalizations are confounded by differences in distribution within the population, and our attempts to make correlations between intelligence and ancestry are further confounded.
Moreover, intelligence is a complex trait, and genetic correlates with intelligence are also often associated with mental health problems and mental retardation. The same genes that boost IQ appear to also lower IQ, further confounding our attempts to locate them and undermining any claim that a race as a whole benefits from their presence. The fact that the same genes can create both high and low IQ suggests that race is a bad proxy for intelligence, and that we can’t assume that markers of certain genetic heritage will reliably predict ability.
But beyond all this, we shouldn’t be racists because society needs buy-in from its members. Racist policies that exclude people based on ham-handed categorizations, even if they were statistically justifiable, don’t work in practice. The populations aren’t sufficiently different to fully exclude certain members the way we exclude e.g. dogs. Moreover, a system that treats people equally under the law encourages participation and cooperation. Whatever a population’s genetic potential, history has shown pretty clearly that cooperation and exchange dwarf the effects of individual IQ. A small and insular group of geniuses are less productive and less successful than a large group of middling intellects, because much innovation is stochastic, and there’s more to be gained from specialization and comparative advantage than from a small pool of virtuoso talent.
Evolution doesn’t do nearly as much work as you want it to, and it doesn’t preclude either actual or practical equality. You’re still arguing with caricatures, and it hurts your argument.
I’ve already explained this.
When someone does not understand, pretends not to, or simply asks for a repetition, it indicates there’s something blocking his mind.
My 80 IQ points cannot hope to deal with such psychological blocks.
I asked you for your understanding of how intelligence evolves, if, as you believe, it is evenly distributed across populations.
A horse and an ass can mate.
Did genetic isolation produce different species in man,? No…obviously not.
But it did proceed long enough to produce distinct and obvious potentials.
You are simply stating the obvious as if you are about to come to a point.
How does intelligence evolve if it is a product of social nurturing?
How did it evolve for the thousands of years prior to the emergence of societies, or how did it evolve in other species, that are outside human societies?
How does speciation work, if traits are uniformly distributed? How does a common ancestor, for instance, produce two distinct species with different potentials in size, speed, intelligence, and so on?
My position is that it is 70% nature, 30% nurture. Charles Murray is more generous, claiming tis more 60% nature, 40% nurture.
Your kind claims 100% nurture or some minimal number, emphasising nurture.
This means nothing is being naturally selected from the neck up, or what is is but minor, insignificant. So how does intelligence evolve - ni whatever way you choose to define it - within Evolution Theory?
Why does appearance not matter only when it comes to humans?
The intelligence that resulted in man dominating other species.
the intelligence that produced civilizations an technologies that could travel to the stars.
Have you seriously and honestly looked into the subject, or are you repeating the popular sentimental position?
what does racist mean?
Abusing others?
Keeping slaves?
Admitting that races are not social constructs but real?
Tell me more about what I think nature does.
This one black dude - we called him ‘third leg lenny’. Sonofabitch wasn’t even 5’ 6" tall… had a dick so big he had to wear two pair of boxers just to keep that damn thing down. Used to hang his towel on it when he was shaving.
Yup that’s ol’ Lenny. Older fella, in for armed robbery. We used to joke at him on the yard at the weight pile; hey Lenny, somebody’s using the pull-up bar… mind if we use yours?
speaking of, hell, Lenny couldn’t even do ten pull-ups. Fucker weighed a good 195 on account of that dick.
Which statements about Jews produced censorship and which statements were acceptable?
What can’t be said about Jews?
See aegs that’s what you get. You haven’t talked to carleas for five minutes and he’s already running circles around you. I wuz gonna tell you but I got here too late. I stay away from that dude, and you will too if you know what’s good for ya.
That you even ask…means you will not accept.
See Voltaire on the issue.
Oh Brian…does this crap even work?
It must have, 'cause you wouldn’t still be using it.
Stuck, because nothing you ever did was your responsibility, so why would you change a thing?
Good luck, brotha.
I’ll be gone…next year.
You want me to be censored, don’t ya?
If I begin…it’ll be bad.
Best to stay quiet.
But I’ve hinted at it…throughout this forum.
You can describe the statement without writing the statement.
Do you need me to quote the many romans and Englishmen and Frenchmen, of history, or can you do a google search on your own?
Begin with the Romans…the first.
https://jewishbusinessnews.com/2018/03/07/jews-make-19-forbes-200-worlds-richest-list/
So Jews make up about 20% of the world’s wealthiest.
I bet they make up even more of America’s wealthiest, since Jews are more socioeconomically, politically and populationally represented in America than they are in the rest of the world as a whole, yet…
http://www.globalreligiousfutures.org/religions/jews
Jews are 20% of the world’s wealthiest, but only 0.2% of the world’s population, wow!
That’s an overrepresentation of 100 times!
Of course there are lots of wealthy white people too, but we’re not anywhere near as overrepresented, but ask yourself this: are white people politically organized for our interests?
No, in every majority white country, it is a hate crime to organize for white interests.
Jews have a ton of wealth, and so do whites, but the former heavily exercises its power for its interests, whereas the latter does not and cannot.
In fact, the white elite establishment is organized to flood majority white countries with nonwhites and prop them up at our expense, and who do you think is at the center of that?
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G45WthPTo24[/youtube]
Yes, I’m sure whites have no collective interests, or our interests are 100% evil. 
While Jewish interests are 100% aligned with our interests insofar as we have any and the interests of humanity as a whole. 
I don’t believe that the Jews only make up .2% of the global population. If their true, greatly higher numbers were divulged, their minority status as “THE” protected class above all protected classes would disappear. Simple fact checking online revealed that the number of those who perished in the Holocaust has been highly exaggerated, the 6 million, when there were only 505,000 Jews in Germany in 1933, another source quotes their numbers around 400,000, which leads me to believe that their current numbers are shown in reverse as fewer to protect their minority, victim status.
https://www.feldgrau.com/WW2-Germany-Statistics-and-Numbers
https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/germany-jewish-population-in-1
There were 3.3 million Jews in Poland in 1938. Most perished in the camps.
Jews from most of the occupied territories went to the concentration/extermination camps.