"Inside" Experience

youtube.com/watch?v=T9P1KxVrrWM

How do you know that? Have you read my star chart?

I love the emotional choice of words. I’m sure it has some kind of effect on the minds you seek to exploit…but it has zero effect on me. I am outis.
I know what words are and why you choose those and not others. I know …you.
I was balling and crying and screaming as I posted this. Emotion is your craft and your demise.

True…but the specifics of each religion…or should I more accurately say, ‘spirituality’, exposes the minds that follow it.
Are ou a wannabe shaman?

And what has VO revealed, other than the already established? Life is attracted to elements that are part of itself. Brilliant.
Do you know how…no. you simply stay on the valuing part.
What is new, my friend. You just altered the terminology.
What is new and inspiring in VO?
A modernized Christianity. No…post-modern Judaism, with a bit of Spinoza.

[quote]
Where you are powerful, revelation feels good. Where you are not, not so much.
Men are mostly, myself included, powerful in some regards and weak in others; the consequences of both are magnified.]So humble you’ve suddenly become 160+ IQ.
i never forget…not like these imbeciles.
I recall…because it reveals patterns.
A friendly gesture today, must be juxtaposed to a slap in the past.
Oh, how out of your milieu you are.
Shall we cRap?
Perhaps tell a buddy what a brillant lyricist he is…to keep him around.
Huh?
Let me trace a rune on your arse, dear boy.
It’s magic…I promise.

What are you doing now… it is still honest to a degree but off topic.
Im not interested in your personal affections, I have none for you, which is why I banned you from BTL. You manage to spread an actual bad odour through the internet.

So, can we get back to topic?

Ontology is not about life.

We knew life values.

We didn’t know atoms value.

Valuing equates to love only in an infinitesimal percentage of cases.
Your everlasting romance with idiocy prevents you from following even the first steps I keep repeating.

Why do you think you are here?
Did I invite you ?
Would I ever even address you even in your own home, after you had invited me?
Your arguments are like turds, you shit them out and wonder why no one wants to pick them up.

You pick up my arguments with the same filthy hands which pick up your own to throw it at people who won’t crouch down below you, like the Joker who I presume called you, his eternal father, to help him out because I had bullied him. I hope for your sake that thats the reason and that you didn’t come in here on your own initiative to wallow in your lukewarm shit, because then you are truly lost. Ive never shown you respect. Don’t pretend like you’re here because you respect yourself, or philosophy, you only respect the Joker, I think, because he has a talent you like to have. But you of course make sure he doesn’t capitalize on it. Dumb American basterds.

You know for someone who uses prose and meaningless poetics…you show a distaste for ambiguity not of your own making.

No?
Then why is it self-valuing?
To clouds self-value…do mountains?
Come on…show us what you truly are.

No shit…I thought it was a world alerting insight that would establish you as a thinker on the level of Nietzsche.

Then how do electrons stay in a stable relationship - see the antopomorphic bullshit there- with neutrons?
Do tell.
Do they self-value?

So, self-valuing is not self-loving?
Why not? Because you want to believe you are inventing a new otology?

Such an arrogant cunt, you are.
Ha!!
Yes, and China reads your posts, you imbecile and Peterson was affected by Vo, you moron.
I laughed and laughed…expecting someone to put you in your place…but these brain dead morons were silent before your insanity.

I would be as polite as an eglishman….in your presence.
You would not even know it was me.

Are you not the 160* IQ genius Messiah that will change th course of mankind?
I wanted to be in your presence…before i died…to be in proximity with such insanity.

Listen imbecilic…this crap you’ve ben selling may work on the type of morons like Pezer or those morons on ‘Before the light’ or Sauwie the delicate flower…but you a way over your head here…
That shit don’t fly
May even have a nihilists like Brian giving you the benefit of the doubt, cause h’s only interested in making friends in his post-prison debacle tears…you know those that were determined univerally.

VO this and VO that…you are one obsessive wannabe self-aggrandizing cunt, aren’t you?
This is not the first time you’ve heard this. Is it?

Well, through attracting protons.

But it is not actually said that electrons are particles.
They don’t stabilize by themselves - at best we know they are good for sending discrete signals. We can use them as causes to effects, but not as things.

I claim that we require VO to replace the standard model, because there is no physical boson that completes the formula for an atom.
An atom, I contend, is the definitive physical self-valuing.

So in terms of VO, it is possible electrons as we think we known them are merely values, not self-valuings.

Fact is you come here to read my shitt and talk about it too - you’re so much dumber than Peterson? I sent Peterson a link on fb once, not soon after he became all crazy and red eared and just seemed to have lost it and started attacking monadic theories of ontology.

China reads everything you dummy. What do you think AI is for?
It wouldnt even surprise me if “America First” is based on VO.
The world has become small and almost empty. VO is the only thing that works for us in the west, as our power over others is our capacity to self-value in elaborate ways. Luxury, being that is justified to itself.
Thats what we seek, not some buddhist or christian reduction; even if there can only be one man who truly exists, this is worth the sacrifice of the whole universe. That is Nietzsche, VO, all the flows from it.

Excellent.
Do they value one another?

How do they stabilize?
they send, signal?
They are conscious and intentional?
Ha!!
They communicate?

So, you claim that an atom is a product of intent?
You cannot think of any other circumstance that does not require an allusion to judgment?
‘I think a therefore I am’ means all existence is so?
You, 160+ IQ cannot think of a single alternative that does not require judgment ot any allusion to intent?

They are values in relation to an observer, a consciousness…not in and of themselves.
Value is a misleading term…one who intentionally chose, eh moron?
You wanted to be so much like Nietzsche that you found the word that would connect you to his …psychological brilliance.
He said nothing of importance…his entire opus was about human psychology in a nihilistic world.
most of it is derivative…from Schopenhauer and the pre-Socratics…he modernized them.
Was he your ideal man, Iakob?

I know why Freud invented the Oedipus Complex, but you and this Value centred ontology?
I can only speculate.
Why value and not love or pleasure…or another positive term?
Huh?
You ain’t saying anything different, so why the change in terminology?
Te need to make a name for yourself?
To stand out, to prove the world wrong? To be…valued?..Appreciated?

“an observer,”

yes, but this is the kit. After Descartes, how blatantly off he was, it became clear: what is it that observes?

Well I guess it was already clear to smarter men. But Descartes became an institution for pointing it out.

By the gods,. you are simple.

Tell us more about how the world is reading Iakob and adjusting its strategies. I want them to all see the depths of your insanity.
was Perterson reading you and adjusting his speeches?
What a fucking douche-bag you are!!!
Ha!!!
A world changer…who is living like a bum.
How many lost men-children, like yourself, will you take advantage of before you begin feeling shamed?
But I forget…guilt and shame has become a tool for your people.

The depths of desperate depravity one must fall to believe that the Chinse Politburo, and American chiefs of staff are reading him…and caring…
You have issues.
This entire forum is full of individuals with psychological issues, but you, especially, have issues.
I’m not going to tell you what they are. I want to watch them unfold after I am gone.

Now hold your horses there buddy. I’ve always thought the whole lot of you were cornballs. But I’m still allowed a little cajolery and shit-shootin with the flakes once in a while.

And slow down man with the posting. The typos are out of control. You’re gonna give yourself a stroke.

Are you smoking something right now?
You sound discombobulated…and that shit will not do with someone like me.
It may work on simpletons like those found on ILP,…but not me.
If you cannot put together a cohesive sentence, then do not bother to post.
That word- prose crap you’ve been throwing around is not effective on me.
Get your self together, breath and then post.

Yeah…but it’s all part of a plan…it’s been determined.
Stop complaining for what has been preordained.

I’m hoping to get to eat some ice-cream, if the universal forces have determined it to be so.

Don’t worry, it’s fair enough.

No. They only relate to each other through the actual ontos, atoms.

They are consequences and parts, not self-valuings, except of course the notion of them.
They are values.

Yes, they signal.
electromagnetism.
Thats not something Ill win the Nobel prize for thought - someone else already discovered that. You know what - you’re on a machine made of…

anyway.

No, I clam that “intent” is a weaker version of what is called atomic strong force.
I claim that it is more sensible to reduce ourselves to the atom than the other way around.

So that the utmost we can actually know as beings, not in theory but in the singularity of experience, is the only thing that literally applies to ontology.

What I see is the experience I most singular at the moments crucial values are withdrawn.

Nietzsche worked with it, I took over.
Its the only one that works across the board.

Pathetic. If you dont understand the value philosophy for its own sake has, what, are you in it for the social networking?

Obviously I am my ideal man.

Because electrons have value (-1e) and not pleasure.

Ibid. I use value and not love or pleasure because value applies to mathematics and every other field and these two only in the animal realm.

Well, Aegean, it seems you have certain love for philosophical concepts. You can not think, which means you will never know what thinking is. I mean that. But you have a strong dislike of yourself and urge for philosophical concepts to compensate for that, so you have a certain … erm, substance.

Curious…

No, simpleton they are what?
What does valuing , needing, willing have in common?

Are ou sure…'cause you’ve stated that you are a genius.
Can you think of another way two forces can merge that does not involve a word insinuating a motive?
How does one note harmonize with another?

So, you claim intent is present in non-living unities, like an atom?
I claim that it is more sensible to reduce ourselves to the atom than the other way around.

Does that sentence make sense to you?
I know you’ve gotten away with shit like this, but does it make sense to you…honestly?
Instead of shutting the fuck up when you do not know, you must pretend that you do know with nonspecial sentences like that.

So, Nietzsche, for you, is the epitome the top, the god?
Can you tell me what was his contribution to philosophy, from where you “took over” my idiot8ic self-declared genius?
What did you take over from?

Moron, that strategy does not work on me. Nonsense is nascence…and you pretending it makes sense doews not make it so.
Why ‘value’ imbecile?
Why not ‘love’? To pretend you invented something new?

Really?
You sound like a school girl who just got fucked under the bleachers by the school jock.
I feel like I’m god…no, a butterfly…no…Schopenhauer’s cousin.
Do you have testicles?
You lick them…and suck Nietzsche’s dead cock…but do YOU have testicles?

But VO covers everything…it is so vague and nonsensical that it can encompass everything.
Why did Freud come up with the Oedipus Complex?

To a human, moron.
humans measure it.
Do they have value in and of themselves?
Tell me its energy.
Then why did you call it 'value, hypocrite…why not energy?

I ask again 160+IQ…what is common between your simplistic value, and will, and desire a nd want, and need?
Energy was a hint, you imbecile.

So value applies as a measurement, huh moron?
a measurement of what?
You stopped there, like a pathetic Jew.
Above I almost tell you.

Stick with astrology moron…you ain’t good at psychology.
Maybe Jupiter entering mars will give you a hint.
Ha!!!
When you go off the prose and poetics your true intelligence shines.
Tell me…what am I wearing…hint…nothing.
Ha!!!

You know, I’ve come across superstitious old-wives…but a theoretical male, like you?
Never.
Most astrologers I’ve met had a bit of a kink in their wrist….fags.
Someone told me you once ‘fucked a man’…or did he do you and you inverted the memory?
No shame…taking it up the arse is…in, these days,.

it is related to Freud’s Oedipus Complex theory. How he tried to convince us all that we wanted to fuck uor mothers…did you?

Shhhh… Calm down…

I’m too hyper…need something to calm myself.
meditate…hush,…focus…happy thoughts……
Shit…you are an imbecile.