Is belief in the supernatural an intelligent person’s game?

I am a Gnostic Christian and if you can’t even get that right you are too stupid for me to bother with.

You are also ignoring all the surveys that show that most atheists are better educated about you religion than most of the sheeple.

Regards
DL

Gnostic “Christians” are even more ignorant than atheists are. You’re like the New Age movement. You believe things that have been proven false.

For example, Gnostics deny the crucifixion of Christ when almost all scholars believe Christ was indeed crucified.

It doesn’t surprise me that you support atheism so much.

Go study the Gospels and quit wasting everyone’s time.

Belief is a mental state that suggests that there is something out there. It acts intelligently so we can conclude that an intelligent person responsible for it if we accept the argument, which is, I) There is an intelligent act (an intelligent act being an act which is directed to somewhere), II) Intelligent act is caused by an intelligent person, III) Therefore there is an intelligent person. I, however, don’t see any difference between natural and supernatural except that the first is common whereas the second is rare. They are both caused.

Any so called supernaturnal phenomena that is objectively real is natural by definition
And so if it is caused and can be demonstrated to exist then it cannot be supernatural

That is an outright lie as most do not even believe a miracle working Jesus existed.

Thanks for the great ending.

Regards
DL

Rare?

I hope you do not mean the 7th hand hearsay in holy books.

Tell us what you have seen please or know of miracle as facts please.

Regards
DL

Here are a few associated with Christianity.

magiscenter.com/contemporar … charist-2/

Belief is a mental state that suggests that there is something out there. It acts intelligently so we can conclude that an intelligent person responsible for it if we accept the argument, which is, I) There is an intelligent act (an intelligent act being an act which is directed to somewhere), II) Intelligent act is caused by an intelligent person, III) Therefore there is an intelligent person. I, however, don’t see any difference between natural and supernatural except that the first is common whereas the second is rare. They are both caused.
[/quote]
Rare?

I hope you do not mean the 7th hand hearsay in holy books.

Tell us what you have seen please or know of miracle as facts please.

Regards
DL
[/quote]
Here are a few associated with Christianity.

magiscenter.com/contemporar … charist-2/
[/quote]
I figured. Nothing concrete.

Regards
DL

@ freespirit; see hume’s argument against miracles and russell’s ‘natural law’ argument. i’d get the links for you but my iced mocha just blew up and i’ve got whipped cream all over my fingers. i shouldn’t even be posting this much. you owe me.

Hume and Russell were both atheists that refused to allow the possibility for scientifically verified miracles.

Pardon me while I reject their atheism.

Rare?

I hope you do not mean the 7th hand hearsay in holy books.

Tell us what you have seen please or know of miracle as facts please.

Regards
DL
[/quote]
Here are a few associated with Christianity.

magiscenter.com/contemporar … charist-2/
[/quote]
I figured. Nothing concrete.

Regards
DL
[/quote]
You didn’t read it.

You atheists always reject anything that exposes your materialist world view.

Here are a few associated with Christianity.

magiscenter.com/contemporar … charist-2/
[/quote]
I figured. Nothing concrete.

Regards
DL
[/quote]
You didn’t read it.

You atheists always reject anything that exposes your materialist world view.
[/quote]
I might have missed something but as I said, I saw nothing concrete.

If you had anything in particular, I am sure your would have highlighted it.

I agree that atheists reject your fantasies for what they are.

Thanks for trying to label me such out of your frustration in having me thing as delusionally as you do.

Regards
DL

DL,

You didn’t read it. You are willfully ignorant.

It’s OK. Many atheists are.

Regards,
Brian

Yes.

No. It is based on my spiritual experience.

They can read my mind and put thoughts inside my mind in a way that I feel that it is my thoughts. They are very powerful and there is a hierarchy within them.

An inelegant stereotype. I am an atheist and not a materialist. There is nothing about atheism that dictates worldview beyond literally “without God”. Anything else is on the table.

In terms of established worldviews, mine probably most closely fits Panpsychism, but I have ironed out the issues in this and all other worldviews in my own Experientialism.

There is zero need for religious narrative in either of these, and inserting a token Deistic “God” into the vocabulary serves no use.

Dawkins, maybe. Hitchens simply brought up scripture and presented it for what it is without mercy. Harris has a mastery of philosophy that is on par with the best of them, and far beyond mere experts. He even differs with the 4th horseman of the counter-apocalypse, Dennett, with his monist Materialism that I too rejected back in university. None of them think they’re experts in every field just because they are in their own field.

nuh-uh, not me. i love it. 'cause we are living in a material world, and i am uh material girl

You did not read where I said I was not an atheist, ass hole, but thanks for not showing your best proof.

Regards
DL

Rather like a cosmic consciousness.
It happens that I believe in that, to a point only, because I don’t know if I could differentiate it from what Jung and Freud called our Father Complex.

I have no way of knowing if that is what I telepathically found or a cosmic consciousness.
Sight does not work in our minds and I could not tell if I was outside of my body or within it.

Why are you choosing the supernatural view instead of the natural view?

Regards
DL

I only believe in natural. There are natural phenomena that are rare. People call this supernatural. Otherwise, natural.

Goody good.

I agree.

Regards
DL