What makes you think that the exact opposite isn’t true - that the words you say above don’t in fact apply precisely to you instead of me, and that I couldn’t just as justifiably say the exact same thing about you? I genuinely think the exact same thing about you. Why exactly is it more justified coming from you rather than me? Explain yourself properly for once.
The modal number of lines you’ve written in each of your posts for the last 25 you’ve made is 1. You average 4 lines and your median is 2.
You say next to nothing, if anything at all. What you do say is formulaic and unoriginal, and that one time I remember posting something of length, probably uncharacteristically spread out over more than 1 post I seem to remember, it was literally pure description of just a small number of your views with zero explanation, simple reiteration of the same sentiments that were already quite predictable from just a few of your shallow previous 1- or 2-liner posts. There is pure nothingness to justify your absolutely bafflingly high opinion of yourself. I explain the logic behind my analyses, go through contingencies, advance conversations and am agonisingly self-critical in all of my opinions, willing to re-think them - even actively trying to disprove them myself and to draw out disproofs from others. I have never seen you do any of these things. I’ve even evidenced these things in the post I’m currently writing, whereas you simply state that you think the same of me with absolutely nothing to back it up. Anyone can do that.
This is what justifiably demonstrates me to represent truth, and by extension, life and values that are in line with it. Your approach of simply stating things, either minimally, or repeating the same minimal statements over and over is exactly the same kind of nihilism and death shown in religion, particularly Islam, that states that one simply need to take the words of the Quran for what they are, and that it says the final truth and that no more thought is needed. As for existing though, both you and I appear to do that fine…
You can go ahead and say something along the lines of “is there a point in there at all?” like you usually do (also with zero analysis or justification of any meaning to such a question), or just drop a meme, but this is more of the same of what I have just described about your style - you will only be proving my point. Equally, if you simply make re-iterated statements about how great you think you are (it’s YOU who needs to get over yourself) and give descriptions of what your views are in numerous different ways without explaining anything, then you will also only be proving my point.
In short, you have zero reason to accuse me of any of the things you have accused me of, and I have every reason to accuse you of them.