All kidding aside, in order to achieve a piece in the world , one would have to listen to Jesus in an eschatological sense: love Your enemies.
Jesus may make little sense in today’s seminology ,
however in the sense meaning is progressively and ever subtly refines, one must place some meaning in a pre-conceptualized version of meaning.
Reversals in meaning are due to some internal struggles, revisions, disappointments, which do develop an eventual model of structural cohesion. and need to be looked at irrespective whether it comes out of the mouths of children, idiots, or savants, or occultists. There is, really meaning to even non-sense.
At least allow the current posdibility for an eminent domain of a grey area.
Some paranoia is caused by admitted nexus of wealth with the worthiness to possess it, however, these are subsets of which zspengler has dealt with on a primary level. Society has passed that stage, and some like Rand have presumed such in her unclear assessment and vindication to objectivity.
The point is exactly that, there is a very grave and grey area, which causes paranoia and distrust on both sides of the isle. It is subsumed in a lesser set, of justification, based on a passed identifiable set of presumptive sets, which don’t make as much sense as previously.
So does that sound like a justification of a paranoia? Not at all, instead, it is merely a description of a kind of diagnostic criteria by which the tools of inquiery can gain some measure of validity.