Discussing, disgusting
information, in formation
yes we can, yes weaken
You’ll begin to notice all sorts of funny and interesting double meanings when you observe from this vantage. NLP is about more than just body language, pairing associations, emotional manipulation and gaslighting. Words themselves can cloud and disguise a second level of meaning, and often do. Some of the best examples of this come from politics, unsurprisingly.
I’d recommend writing down your observations when you have them, about these words/phrases with double meaning. The mind is already trained to ignore and forget things on this level so you will be fighting against your own neurological tendencies toward entropic disordering. Which is in part what makes these things so interesting and integrated deep in the mind, since they would need to habituate quite naturally to the opposite neurological tendency of absolute ordering via following along the tree-braching structures of logical necessity. Perhaps by invoking a direct entropy, NLP phrases are able to anchor themselves literally as neurological structure. Something we don’t notice but is always already reshaping our minds at the physical level.
Phonetically two meanings descripted by the same sound by disjointed retoric, is recorded by both ways, and creates a kind of autistic ground if the recording happens below the mirror stage.
Then the stage is set; for example Wittgensteins naive positivism.
That proves he was foretelling a description that only the future can absolutely verify.
This mode of proposing a neural formation of propositional relation to the question you brought up in a parallel demonstration to behaviorally shifted ideas to those characterized as borderline , can be reduced analytically to basic, logical modes , establishing the linkage (between social and individual points of view)
The neural and social networking can be demonstrated in terms of modeling on the exclusion or inclusion of the middle or , on their fallacious utilization.
Nietzche was way ahead of the evaluation, as in an inclusive/exclusive ‘beyond’ which may still lie absolutes , categorically closed, so that not disprove the ‘absolute’ , only sees it as appearing as a choice going nowhere.
As the syllogism grows and matures above that ,
it may be suggested that exclusion and/or inclusion of value may mean (logos) that may not be adequate to define the ways, the mean value (golden mean) .
The basic brain processes of the try parted structure could have a prior existential component as repeatedly casual in the way the brain processes data which develops into the mind’s response of how it interprets said data, or, inversely, data is of no casual relation to the affects the mind responds here.
The exclusion/inclusion of relative data to form judgements on the matter are probably relatively controversial.
Hence, propositions can propagate, into propaganda, as tool with which to utilize the perimeters of meaning , but mostly inadequate to overcome the ‘effects’ that are primarily intrinsic to the structural efficacy of what they are and where they originally came from to form them.
That extends the argument of decimating it , reverse engineering the mind, sort of speak, to the argument about rhetorical use against intuitive resourcing; that is, it has lasting invariable and transcendence, an invaluable and willful objective choice.
This is actually more true (historically speaking) than Meno’s insanity makes it sound like.
The willful elimination of intelligence within one’s self and its replacing with 2 bit slogans, consciesness all throughout, is invariably referred to and thought of as:
May, yet poetic liscence allows to a rightful minimum, effects an inverse challenging the futility of finding it so.
The opposite hedging similarly descends to those so disposed to such.
No judge at all possible when nearly both so very nearly equipped, turn it minimally , and it becomes glaringly allusive to illusion, no trick or word play, only such scarcity of description hides tit’s shadow, that is, so that it’s guardian angel could bestow upon as it’s world interiorrily turns away to abstract futility:
Both seek justice that need not issue forth it’s predicament, yet that was exactly was the object of its derision spring forth purpose before motivation.
Hark angels cry, hear , when such plot fails to turn but withholds it’s strange accompaniment, for high grounds in the deserted lot,.
The ages of medium recall such as necessary to middle, to divide, and seek middle where ages come to rest.
That way such unnatural privilege shifts the balance the fulcrum of desire.
It is pointless to search fror one in a pointillistic field that could such effect become a conviction that could become a throwback , pointless, when the two produce the third giving rise to the subtle and not it’s grievance, for it’s double that the concern shifts to, the one received the conduit desired.