Del Ivers wrote:By her measure then the civil rights movement was nothing more than a political strategy. It's that movement, and all the sacrifices made by both black and white people of the time, that gives her the freedom to be where she is now and express herself without persecution. Getting lynched and having tomatoes thrown at you are very different things.
Prismatic567 wrote:I believe what Candace is trying to imply is the KKK's spirit is still within the DNA of the Democrats*.
Karpel Tunnel wrote:I think she's on to a lot here, but it seems like some of you missed that she is a
democrat
Her reasons for being that may have nothing to do with race
but it leaves open the pretty obvious thing which is that the Republicans also have some serious racists threads running through them
It is good to point out that the party that sees itself as less racist has racism in it, even racism that it thinks is anti-racist and/or cynically sells as that.
None of this means that the republicans aren't racist.
And here we have a new hero saying she is a democrat anyway. How fucked up must the republicans be to her, if not on race, on something.
I could have missed it, but it seems to me she is calling out one facet of the left's actions and attitudes, not the whole thing.Prismatic567 wrote:I wonder how she could claim to be democrat and yet support the republicans to the hilt?
Republicans have a long history, say over the last 50 years, of supporting policies that when carried out are racist. This can be around the enforcement of drug laws where the drugs of choice of blacks get much stiffer sentences, to the way policing is carried out, to policies intended to block minorities from voting, from using codes and specific cases to pulling racist votes - Trump being no exception. It's not a coincidence that open racists will go towards the Republican party.As I understand the republican ideology do not have any racist elements [right or wrong?].
I am sure you will find nothing written that is racist in some official republican party policy, but then neither side does this in some overarching way.The Democrats were the worst racists originally but somewhere in history the Democrats decide to champion the minority and the blacks thus sidelining many of the Democrat's racists and so they voted for the republicans. There are only two main parties, so it is either Democrat or Republican. The problem was the republicans then did not explicitly reject the racists, for political convenience in getting extra votes. But the basic republican ideology is not racist.
There is a surface ideology and the shadow ideology. And racists have not been dumb to vote REpublican.As with any human group, there are extremists, thus there will be a small % of white supremacists within the Republican voters but the republican ideology itself is not racist.
Sure, Republican policies and practices have had nothing to do with slums and poverty.However the racist and evil proclivities still exist within the DNA of the Democrats. As Dinesh and Candace claimed, the Democrats are still bossing and keeping the blacks in modern "plantations" [slums and poverty] that suppressed their progress and brainwashing them as victims so inducing the black to vote for them.
Sure, if the get past the middle class and into those brackets where republican policies really create benefits.In general blacks [as most ordinary humans would] who had or can progress beyond the current poverty level would likely to vote republican to avoid high taxes on their higher earnings, so they can enjoy a better lifestyle.
FAir enough, was just going by what she said.WendyDarling wrote:Miss Owens used to be a Democrat, but turned Republican around a year and a half ago. She made a faux pas when she said she is a Democrat, merely a slip of the tongue.
WendyDarling wrote:Miss Owens used to be a Democrat, but turned Republican around a year and a half ago. She made a faux pas when she said she is a Democrat, merely a slip of the tongue.
Karpel Tunnel wrote:I could have missed it, but it seems to me she is calling out one facet of the left's actions and attitudes, not the whole thing.Prismatic567 wrote:I wonder how she could claim to be democrat and yet support the republicans to the hilt?Republicans have a long history, say over the last 50 years, of supporting policies that when carried out are racist. This can be around the enforcement of drug laws where the drugs of choice of blacks get much stiffer sentences, to the way policing is carried out, to policies intended to block minorities from voting, from using codes and specific cases to pulling racist votes - Trump being no exception. It's not a coincidence that open racists will go towards the Republican party.As I understand the republican ideology do not have any racist elements [right or wrong?].
You are quite correct that there are only two parties, so racists will have to vote for someone. The two party system is terrible and both parties are bought. It's tag team wrestling on normal people.
WendyDarling wrote:Ha, they'd still say Trump's racist against blacks, muslims, and Mexicans. The left just hates Trump, in their eyes he can do no right.
promethean75 wrote:hahaha... go to 6:10 if you don't want the whole 15 minutes.
Prismatic567 wrote:promethean75 wrote:hahaha... go to 6:10 if you don't want the whole 15 minutes.
Harris is commenting on the obvious warts of Trump most ordinary people would do but do not have the holistic outlook to optimize within the constraints of the present circumstances.
I don't believe any of the 2016 Republican contenders for the president could have done a better job than Trump, now given his proven result so far which I believe is still net-positive for the USA.
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: WendyDarling