surreptitious75 wrote:
Let me take abortion as it is the go to example here
Morality A says that human life is sacred and cannot be violated
Morality B says that female bodily autonomy is sacred and cannot be violated
Morality A and Morality B are in conflict with each other and are therefore incompatible
There is no OBJECTIVE means of determining which one of them should supersede the other
SUBJECTIVE solutions [ Morality A over Morality B or Morality B over Morality A ] are not absolute
Some claim OBJECTIVE MORALITY but the existence of free will means that it can be SUBJECTIVELY INTERPRETED
Also OBJECTIVE MORALITY does not account for the evolutionary origin of morality which means it cannot be objective by definition
This lack of OBJECTIVE MORALITY is why I personally am neither pro abortion or anti abortion as I cannot resolve the two conflicting moralities
And this can be extended from the specific to the general with regard to ALL major moral issues which is why there will always be conflict surrounding them
You didn't even address my argument.
Zero sum worlds that violate consent are evil.
Non zero sum worlds that don't violate consent are good.
Consent is intersubjective for all beings to the extent that it is objective.