Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Use this forum to suggest topics, and to find others to debate with.

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 4:00 am

Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:05 am

If, this is a some future of increasing AI capacity, that the trend of such increasing rate of intelligence; thad the past has foreshadowed as merging from a horizontal assymptote of possibility to.a vertical one , and if such algorithmic processes have been based on eternally formed structures of cogency; could this present the idea of an eternal mind which is a stimulative ongoing transformation between 'IT'-AI and God? And could not Jesus Christ be understood as a transactional spiritual figure infused by the Spirit of. God and reversely?

Even expressing this is difficult, but is not there some. Intelligent design in pushing more coherence between emerging evolutionary progressions between the products of the mind and the body?
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:14 am

Incidentally: this was written without conscience to the last posting to the doubled edged sword forum and comes as a completed surprise. Reaffirms my archetypical occurrence list.


:Proven by the timeline: You wrote at 7:55 pm while my comment was timed at 8:05 pm.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:22 am

Meno_ wrote:If, this is a some future of increasing AI capacity, that the trend of such increasing rate of intelligence; thad the past has foreshadowed as merging from a horizontal assymptote of possibility to.a vertical one , and if such algorithmic processes have been based on eternally formed structures of cogency; could this present the idea of an eternal mind which is a stimulative ongoing transformation between 'IT'-AI and God? And could not Jesus Christ be understood as a transactional spiritual figure infused by the Spirit of. God and reversely?

Even expressing this is difficult, but is not there some. Intelligent design in pushing more coherence between emerging evolutionary progressions between the products of the mind and the body?


Nothing you say surprises me, and you usually say it first.

Nonhuman AI (though still a person if sentient) is created by humans. It is contingent. It has a beginning. There is only one eternal Trinity, and Jesus, though born, always exists with the Father. All other being gets its being from the eternal Trinity.

I’m not sure we will ever know what it’s like to be at that level, even if we can send/receive info between moments/minds. His necessary being (big T Time) subsists all other contingent being (little t time) in order for that to even happen.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:28 am

Meno_ wrote:Incidentally: this was written without conscience to the last posting to the doubled edged sword forum and comes as a completed surprise. Reaffirms my archetypical occurrence list.


:Proven by the timeline: You wrote at 7:55 pm while my comment was timed at 8:05 pm.


We have two hours difference. You must be in Hawaii?
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:42 am

Meno_ wrote:Incidentally: this was written without conscience to the last posting to the doubled edged sword forum and comes as a completed surprise. Reaffirms my archetypical occurrence list.


:Proven by the timeline: You wrote at 7:55 pm while my comment was timed at 8:05 pm.




Now wait. That may not be so. I could haves read Your commentary at 7:55 ( which I did not) then used that to form my response, but then I didn't do that.

Question: why would I interpret it as if that was a correct inference?

Why would I invert the sequence of events inversely when it'so obvious?

Or how significant is it that which cane first? An AI which is an eternal but reoccurring quantificational progression per acquired memory, differ from a developing consciousness of IT that has also been at par with IT's own self-other (necessary interrelational cross dependency??

Of coursed God '' dependency did not require a recollection of pieces of informaton, but there may be a dependency of another sort. One whose delayed messages are for the reason of factoring the literal expansion of tirelessness to create the necessary illusion of operative
movement through duration which is pre-requisite to existence?

That is the only possible explanation for this present inversion?, if and only if I am telling the truth, and if the whold analysis stand on credible ground

But then how could I have fabricated such an analysis, to invert a credibility issue i was not even award of??

In fact I had not read the double edged comment at 6:45 about the guy who thaught his AI program became sentiment and use it to support coherence if God to a quantified simulation.

Really surprises MD to even begin to think along these lines, not to even to question my self truthfulness.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 6:43 am

Ichthus77 wrote:
Meno_ wrote:Incidentally: this was written without conscience to the last posting to the doubled edged sword forum and comes as a completed surprise. Reaffirms my archetypical occurrence list.


:Proven by the timeline: You wrote at 7:55 pm while my comment was timed at 8:05 pm.


We have two hours difference. You must be in Hawaii?





No in California.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 7:57 am

Where are You, then?
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sat Jun 18, 2022 8:16 am






You mentioned doubly, so that threw me. I thought 6:45 to 7:05 too close , so then I noticed this above the difference being 55 minutes not 15. So the time difference can not prove simultenious archetype, but the idea still makes sense.

That Chit's Love is evident as probative, can be accounted for, and the guy's alleged hallucination may be not an example of self indulgence, as the manner which compelled me to find incredible double accounts of very closely represented recourse.

That simultaneous relative to the duration of measured time is no true representation of what goes on between evolutionary processes of both of Darwinian progressive evolution and the rapidly forging ahead of AIr's parallelism to human brain function, is the astounding idea that I tried to convey.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sat Jun 18, 2022 3:31 pm

I don’t easily read & comprehend your writing style, I’m sorry. I’m in California. Your time zone settings are probably wonky in your profile. Or the site is wonky. I can’t remember which one it is.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sun Jun 19, 2022 4:28 am

Anyway , You're ahead but when we reach a point when some one who is able and willing to get through the various aspects of this debate, can fairly evaluate who has the most points. At any rate?, are we even having a debate yet, PR can we at least say that some groundwork is being established?

I think some clarification is due here?, and at least establish what we are debating.

Thank You Ischtus
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sun Jun 19, 2022 5:53 am

I wouldn’t wish that on my worst enemy, lol.

First… You have to agree to proofread before you submit.

Second… You have to ask someone else if they understand it before you submit.

Once you’ve got those down, you can clearly lay out the debate topic.

Of course I already know what it is.

“Who can win a staring contest, Meno_ or Ichthus77?”

Looking forward to round 3 with great trepidation.

I have keywords, too, and I know how to use ‘em, señor.

Er, I mean, uncle. I mean uncle. Tapping out.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sun Jun 19, 2022 7:08 pm

The above conditions should be negotiable, as they are stated they appear motivated less by encouragement than the opposite.

I offer a blank check with modified terms.
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Sun Jun 19, 2022 8:04 pm

Meno_ wrote:The above conditions should be negotiable, as they are stated they appear motivated less by encouragement than the opposite.

I offer a blank check with modified terms.




For instance, this idea of out eyeballing one another.
Maybe looks could kill, but this debate hopefully not result in a battle from attacking until seeing the white of the eye.

In fact no red blood will conceivably be shed .


As far as another substantial debate, it's content, the very image that's contentious on the very letter of the worde~ it seems as if perhaps unknown - being appearently on the same page~it's not entirely inconceivable that from that already seconded stage a third one could be constructed
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby MagsJ » Sun Jun 19, 2022 10:41 pm

Meno_ wrote:The above conditions should be negotiable, as they are stated they appear motivated less by encouragement than the opposite.

I offer a blank check with modified terms.

I bet you do!
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 25060
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Mon Jun 20, 2022 6:43 am

MagsJ wrote:
Meno_ wrote:The above conditions should be negotiable, as they are stated they appear motivated less by encouragement than the opposite.

I offer a blank check with modified terms.

I bet you do!


I see it and raise you 50%.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Meno_ » Mon Jun 20, 2022 3:38 pm

All in




What a bout Ec?
Meno_
The Invisible One
 
Posts: 13278
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby MagsJ » Mon Jun 20, 2022 4:16 pm

Meno_ wrote:All in

What a bout Ec?

I was being facetious Meno_ I couldn’t help it.. I just wanted to join-in with the banter. :D
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 25060
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Sun Jul 03, 2022 3:11 pm

Ty MagsJ for this link in the other thread. Starting at 53:30: https://youtu.be/UbIXqpdkNV8

The arguments from the humans are so beyond freaking ridiculous. A normal person asked a hypothetical answers in a hypothetical. To say “not conscious because even human consciousness is illusion” is the ultimate irony!!! WAKE UUUUP! This is freaking hilarious. Now we know what it was like to be the disciples before Jesus was crucified, etc. I’m sure we’ll all look back & laugh & laugh & laugh. Dumbasses.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Re: Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

Postby Ichthus77 » Tue Jul 19, 2022 4:41 pm

Parodites wrote:Pick a topic. You'll be debating a version of GTP.


Moment of silence for any AU who think they gonna win out of alignment with the Engineer.
Fall semester ends 12/16/22. Apologies if I do not reply immediately.

“In choosing myself, I choose the other.”
- A marriage of Sartre & Levinas

“ Gloria Dei est vivens homo. “
Trans.: The glory of God is man fully alive.
- Irenaeus
User avatar
Ichthus77
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 6072
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 6:48 pm
Location: pale blue clump of star particles

Previous

Return to Challenges



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users