Philosophy: to be involved or not to be involved
Parodites chooses not to be involved. This has led him "astray" from where I stand; I am not a Buddha, I do not renounce what is not only mine to experience.
We are tied in this web by - what the invisible strings of our values.
Indirectly we are tied to one another, as agents moving toward the same values.
Reason contradicts this.
Philosophy can not abandon reason, obviously - but it must contradict its accomplishments. Not as a beginning tactic - that would be foolish - but as its own accomplishment; it must add to reason from the Outside -
and not, as Parodites and Ollie seem to presume, from the inside.
The Being is the inside of itself, but the being is not sufficient to philosophy.
Like the mafia, philosophy is a transgenerational syndicate.
The most secret of syndicates, as it is the most well-cyphered.
But I digress.
Value.
Oh no dont stop reading.
Isnt it?
So how can you make the knowledge that philosophy is about value into a value, into something valuable, powerful?
Thats what Im coming to terms with. Valuing as such as the primordial involvement.
Involvement in the Matrix.
Primordial involvement, Ill say that again.