Meno_ wrote:Lorikeet wrote:Not exactly....Judaism was so attractive - seductive - to the ill, the excluded, the desperate in other tribes that it negated the original intent of preserving and manipulating victimhood.
They did not want others to have it.
But, civilizations produced "losers" and ill and degenerates by the dozens and these needed something comarable...so Christianity and Islam was invented to offer absolution to the losers and victims of natural selection, in every tribe.
Again appears optically patent, but latently there are almost nearly logical flaws.
How can other civilizations 'create' multitudes of victimhood, if not purely by reductive fiat?
For the same reason a species evolves the defensive strategy of pretending to be hurt or dead.
In this case victimhood manipulated human sympathetic qualities who identify in the suffering of a victim their own existential plight.
Meno_ wrote:The hidden intentional scheme, surely is antithetical to evolving cycles of familiality, and victimhood began as an essential component if the chains if indiginous power struggles within and without various sets of families, inter-alia.
Spsirituality of identifying as the "chosen" by divinity, "victim" is a method of dealing with the negative consequences of parasitical survival strategies that produce inevitable animosity in the host, when it discovers something hiding in tis midst that is sucking it dry of energies.
It manipulates the infection, called Christianity, with a victim ethical system.
Power built on pretending powerlessness - the paradox of parasitism necesitating self-deciet.
Women do this same thing to manipulable men - pretending to be fragile helpless princesses to manipulate males by triggering their protector/provider genetic impulses.
Many males know this is happening but enjoy playing along, because it feeds into their manliness - especially betas or males with no easy access to feminine sexual favours.
Heterosexuality is about pretences and flirting, i.e., negotiating terms and conditions on a subconscious level.
Meno_ wrote:You dint have to evolve a' victimhood meme' based on retro psychoanalitic interpretation, when a near animal eats it's young, BH mistaking if for it's neighbors, the question of intentionality drips out if the equation, but the questin of some kind if very early sun if guilt can be attributed to the victimize.
Anything that is effective evolves and is established as an automated impulse.
The actor need not comprehend what is occurring, it may even believe in tis own pretence to make it more effective.