Desperate Degenerate Support Group

[Pedro I Rengel]

with only 1 party voting for her

This is such a stupid thing to say. I could as easily say with only 1 party voting against her, as a block, and it would warrant the same suspicion you are implying.

dude the vote is a matter of public record. only gop senators voted to confirm her i dont know how thats controversial

Don't disappoint me here Mr R, you seem smart enough so far.

What I am saying is that as much as only Rs voted for, only Ds voted against. It is a stupid thing to say.

[Mr Reasonable]

she has been vocal over many years about wanting to change the abortion laws

OK, source please.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/28/91782773 ... ion-rights

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5 ... ive-rights

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/520 ... tion-cases

https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org ... e-care-act

https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/06/politics ... index.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ganization

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10 ... ital-crime

[Pedro I Rengel]

you yourself said that scotus appeals were final so what will you say if she votes to overturn roe v wade?

I also said that the scouts can act as its own appeals, if it decides to.

But only indirectly. Roe v Wade was already decided. But scotus can take on a different case of a similar nature, and act as an indirect appeals that way.

[Pedro I Rengel]

she has been vocal over many years about wanting to change the abortion laws

OK, source please.

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/28/91782773 ... ion-rights

https://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/5 ... ive-rights

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/520 ... tion-cases

https://www.plannedparenthoodaction.org ... e-care-act

https://www.cnn.com/2020/10/06/politics ... index.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ganization

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/10 ... ital-crime

"I think don't think the core case – Roe's core holding that, you know, women have a right to an abortion – I don't think that would change. But I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions, how many restrictions can be put on clinics – I think that would change,"

This is your smoking gun?

[Pedro I Rengel]

Also you keep going on about her experience. But she was a federal appeals judge. That is the pool you would select a scotus judge from.

Up your game, son. This just stinks of dishonesty.

[Mr Reasonable]

but her at least she thinks that felons should be able to have guns but not vote so thats nice

https://reason.com/2020/09/23/amy-coney ... y-records/

https://bearingarms.com/cam-e/2020/10/1 ... bear-arms/

https://newrepublic.com/article/159512/ ... ing-rights

https://www.guns.com/news/2020/10/19/se ... ly-at-risk

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

https://www.heritage.org/courts/comment ... ht-reasons

oh look theres even a flattering article from from the heritage foundation they aren't partisan at all

[Pedro I Rengel]

No, your last list of bullshit articles took that right from you.

You must quote the incident directly from them.

I don't have time to sift through your propaganda.

[Mr Reasonable]

"I think don't think the core case – Roe's core holding that, you know, women have a right to an abortion – I don't think that would change. But I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions, how many restrictions can be put on clinics – I think that would change,"

This is your smoking gun?

the difference between having a right to something in theory and having access to it are quite different this is how justices talk in confirmation hearings. someone who wasn't a judicial activist would have said about a matter of settled law that they believed in the the doctrine of stare decisis

[Mr Reasonable]

No, your last list of bullshit articles took that right from you.

You must quote the incident directly from them.

I don't have time to sift through your propaganda.

[Pedro I Rengel]

"I think don't think the core case – Roe's core holding that, you know, women have a right to an abortion – I don't think that would change. But I think the question of whether people can get very late-term abortions, how many restrictions can be put on clinics – I think that would change,"

This is your smoking gun?

the difference between having a right to something in theory and having access to it are quite different this is how justices talk in confirmation hearings. someone who wasn't a judicial activist would have said about a matter of settled law that they believed in the the doctrine of stare decisis

You said she said she wanted to change abortion laws.

She was just giving some extremely careful opinions on abortion legislation.

Now you want to make it about something else.

Make up your mind.

[Pedro I Rengel]

No, your last list of bullshit articles took that right from you.

You must quote the incident directly from them.

I don't have time to sift through your propaganda.

It's not fake news. You just piled 10 different articles to me alleging that somewhere in there some quote supports what you say.

I don't have time son. Did you even read them yourself? What is the quote.

[Mr Reasonable]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

[Pedro I Rengel]

No, your last list of bullshit articles took that right from you.

You must quote the incident directly from them.

I don't have time to sift through your propaganda.

It's not fake news. You just piled 10 different articles to me alleging that somewhere in there some quote supports what you say.

I don't have time son. Did you even read them yourself? What is the quote.

Las time you did that, about 10 mins ago, it turned out to be bullshit.

[Pedro I Rengel]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

I asked for a source. You have not provided.

When did she ever say that lol?

[Mr Reasonable]

just say that you want activist judges that agree with your politics man whats this need for the high road?

[Pedro I Rengel]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

Not any more than you are to not show where you hit that girl affter you raped her.

Now, what is the quote, where can I find it?

I will not sift through 10 different articles you just googled with random key words.

[Mr Reasonable]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

I asked for a source. You have not provided.

When did she ever say that lol?

can you not reason that a woman who has been a member of and who has received support from groups who hold as their primary purpose to overturn roe that it's probably that she wants to overturn roe? i mean we know she wasnt chosed for her 3 years experience right? we can admit that right? surely the judge with 3 years experience wasn't the most qualified possible appointee....right?

[Pedro I Rengel]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

I asked for a source. You have not provided.

When did she ever say that lol?

can you not reason that a woman who has been a member of and who has received support from groups who hold as their primary purpose to overturn roe that it's probably that she wants to overturn roe? i mean we know she wasnt chosed for her 3 years experience right? we can admit that right? surely the judge with 3 years experience wasn't the most qualified possible appointee....right?

Yo but that is not what you said. You said she said she wants to overturn a scotus decision.

Do you see what I mean? This is just plain dishonest.

[Mr Reasonable]

youre putting in a lot of work to avoid having to face the reality that she was chosen for her view that a supreme court case should be overturned

Not any more than you are to not show where you hit that girl affter you raped her.

Now, what is the quote, where can I find it?

I will not sift through 10 different articles you just googled with random key words.

bruh the whole thing with confirmation hearings is that they dance around and dont give the quote so you end up having to reason for yourself about a persons motives and intentions and since she took money from anti roe groups, and wrote about it and didnt respond affirmatively that she sees it at settled law then common sense and a little reasoning gives you the information thats how that works

[Mr Reasonable]

why you love her so much?

[Mr Reasonable]

are you fucking with me right now or are you really that far down the rabbit hole that you dont see things that are right in front of you?

[Pedro I Rengel]

Hahahahahahahaha

Why is this a problem of me?

You said she said she wants to overturn a scotus decision. You said that. Not me. I didn't even suggest you implied that. You straight up said it.

For fuck's sake, is the truth not good enough to argue with?

[Mr Reasonable]

you dont think she wants to color the law by overturning or reinterpreting some part of roe? look at the quote you posted

[Mr Reasonable]

for real though why can gop do no wrong to you?

[Pedro I Rengel]

I think, before you get to ask any more questions, you have to start fezzing up to at least some of the lies you have straight up said to my face.

Then we can start an honest argument, about what factors might influence case rulings.

I'm finally getting sleepy again, see you tomorrow.