Greatest I am wrote:Christians are more moral than Yahweh and Jesus. So why worship them?
The Bible contains many instances that show Yahweh doing things that no moral human would do. Not even the most right-wing Christian theist.
If you Christians had God’s power, in Noah’s days, you Christians would not use Genocide against man and beast on the earth. Jesus said he came to cure those in need, not kill them, so you would cure those in Noah’s day and would not kill them all. Right?
In Egypt, you Christians would not harden Pharaoh’s heart but would leave it soft and let him let the Jews go. You would not punish the first born for what their parents did. If anything, you would punish the guilty and not the innocent. Right?
To the many other instances where God ordered massacres of babies, you Christians would not, as your better morals would make you care or cure and not kill. Right?
Christians and Muslim thus recognize their better morals. That being the case, why have you Christians and Muslims chosen to follow a God whose morals are inferior to your own?
Religions are supposed to be all about morals, yet Christians seem to ignore that their morals and ethics are better than Yahweh’s by a long shot. Right?
Why do you follow Yahweh, knowing that your morals are above Yahweh’s?
Regards
DL
This is an issue that many people have spoken about over the course of time. There have been those who have pointed out that the God of Jesus cannot be the God of the Old Testament – even early on in Christianity. The Fathers of the Church struggled with the question and have pointed to the allegorical approach to the OT, or to make the teaching of Christ a supersession of the OT. This wasn’t accepted by what we have come to know as orthodoxy, but it was an issue.
Another way of looking at the OT is to put aside our morality of the modern day and understand the symbolic message of the OT. There are people who have shown the symbolism of Genesis, which can be found throughout the OT, as a portrayal of how heaven and earth are symbols of the plan and the realisation respectively. In “The Language of Creation: Cosmic Symbolism in Genesis: A Commentary” by Mathieu Pageau, he explains how this works.
He starts of “salvaging creation from the scientific world view” because Genesis is quite clearly not that. He speaks of spiritual and material perspectives being at odds. He then goes on to talk about the biblical cosmology and heaven and earth and the use of symbols and language. Then he talks about humanity and the image of God and Adam as a microcosm. His next part talks about time and space in the Bible being different concepts to our modern-day ideas. The main gist of all this is to point out that the symbolic language of the Bible cannot be taken and read as a modern text. We must enter the cosmology and symbolic world of the Bible to understand it.
That is why the OT does cause us problems today, especially when people take it literally. You can only do that if you understand it within the confines of the biblical cosmology. Then you understand that the texts are not as problematic as they first appeared to be. It still is and archaic text, but it isn’t as bad as we thought.