My main interest here in regard to moral and political value judgments comes down to two things:
1] the extent to which they are rooted in subjective political prejudices derived from my own estimation of dasein and
2] the extent to which they are rooted in assessments that can be confirmed based on actual facts able to be demonstrated by one side or the other
Which brings me to an op-ed in the NYT today:
QAnon
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/opin ... e=Homepage
In particular, this part:
'Her other major worry is the conspiracy lollapalooza known as QAnon. It’s often short-handed the way Savannah Guthrie did at her town hall takedown of Donald Trump last week — as a nutty conspiracy theory in which a heroic Trump is prosecuting a secret war against a satanic pedophile ring of lefty elites.
'But that undersells QAnon’s danger. To people who have been “Q-pilled,” QAnon plays a much deeper role in their lives; it has elements of a support group, a political party, a lifestyle brand, a collective delusion, a religion, a cult, a huge multiplayer game and an extremist network.
'Donovan thinks QAnon represents a new, flexible infrastructure for conspiracy. QAnon has origins in a tinfoil-hat story about a D.C.-area pizza shop, but over the years it has adapted to include theories about the “deep state” and the Mueller probe, Jeffrey Epstein, and a wild variety of misinformation about face masks, miracle cures, and other hoaxes regarding the coronavirus. QAnon has been linked to many instances of violence, and law enforcement and terrorism researchers discuss it as a growing security threat.
'“We now have a densely networked conspiracy theory that is extendible, adaptable, flexible and resilient to take down,” Donovan said of QAnon. It’s a very internet story, analogous to the way Amazon expanded from an online bookstore into a general-purpose system for selling anything to anyone.'
Lies. Lies about things that can actually -- easily -- be confirmed as lies. Lies that all politicians are known for but on a level now where Trump simply lies not caring if they can be confirmed as lies. Lies that particularly ignorant people are willing to believe because it fits right in with my own arguments regarding objectivism. The psychology of objectivism. Only now armed and dangerous and bringing the country closer and closer to one or another cataclysm.
Me, I've got my own rendition of the "deep state". But I'd like to believe that the facts bear out my assessment of how Wall Street and K Street in collusion with their political cronies in Washington are in fact in sync with those who own and operate the global economy.
This part: https://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtop ... s#p2397749
Facts galore here.