Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Elevate form over function to get at less easily articulable truths.

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

Tripitch #1

The very bottom line of most resistance , hold it,

A tight elastic steel

and it can't snap


The length of it, slightly changed here

But at the levels Satan plays

It becomes inestimable

Duration


and as long and measuring its thinned out elasticity


through and through times'


Passages
Last edited by Meno_ on Sun Aug 30, 2020 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:40 pm

The existencial loss of ideal, connect to the pleasure , in it's self, works only through the etherialization into the micro- elements, that travel ever for through.


Limits then recede miniatures become haunted,
and dropped into the tiniest parts,

Once there You,

anew , hold, it
takes root,

a new baby cries, tries again gasping

and remembers, little

little oh,

My joy, my heart,

hold on .


Tripitch #2


"Momma why do whites hate blacks"?


Cause sugar, when momma came here , paid for the price of blood diamonds, 'childe, momma was in grandma's belly.
Most die on ships coming over from africa, and then resold on open market, for breed'n.

Now once free, then told momma to go back home, but sugar there ain't no home for momma to go back to , see, cause momma don't speak but english, and no folks longing for momma to see there no ways now how.

and now sweet, white folks hate momma because black folks don't matter no mo, don't fit nowhere, used merchandise only drinkin' and us'in now, and u chil' you ain't none better then momma. . but maybe better lookin.

Sweetums hold on to momma, i am the only thing you' all ever get to have beside u.

You ain't none too good like momma., but ya still young.

"But momma, Oprah and that Kamala lady running with biden them matter...."


Child, them are props, used for them nearsighted , and oversold.

Goodnight momma, good night child'.
Last edited by Meno_ on Mon Aug 31, 2020 12:14 am, edited 4 times in total.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:53 pm

Tripitch .#3

Mist atomizers since the i is hiding
In the eye
What u need to abide in

The u and the illusive
me

If can't u go there u must

then u can't overcome the illusion


from a 2 z
And from alpha 2 omega


( so long, the short of it, the pleasure replaced not displaced or displeased.)


Hello me/you, how do you do!?!


Picasso tripitch accompany-'d



Then again, heading to cross, of and by cross, in spite of double. ( knowing the power and effects of atomizers)




https://youtu.be/IYhqlOQ1vHY


CONVERGANCE


When first dreamt of M Polanyi, everyone had doubts, expressly ambig.

Course that was years ago, and now it came full circle.

Yesterday it was the Feast of Saint Monica, the mother of St. Augustine.

He and his mom immigrated from Ostia in Italy to Africa, where he connected through Saint. to a Gnosticism . in a loose stretch of the meaning of the term.


Now comes the kicker, Polanyi revered Augustine, and this phenomenal assymetry is astounding, raising the elements of faith hyperbolically.

Sure more to come.


s reticent I am about this 'revelation' in conventional terms , has been successfully been overcome by a yet undefined urge.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Wed Sep 02, 2020 3:41 am

Philosophy vs. Psychology?


A lot of thought goes into the pre- eminence of psychological solutions bearing down unto it's philosophical underpinnings

Crucial ideas : such as posed by Plato, Descartes, Hegel, Nietzsche, prescribe what is to come to bear fruit in psychology.

Strains of though do actually reflect each other and transact the movement and momentum that crisscross a meaningful continuity.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Wed Sep 02, 2020 5:58 pm

Meno_ wrote:Philosophy vs. Psychology?


A lot of thought goes into the pre- eminence of psychological solutions bearing down unto it's philosophical underpinnings

Crucial ideas : such as posed by Plato, Descartes, Hegel, Nietzsche, prescribe what is to come to bear fruit in psychology.

Strains of though do actually reflect each other and transact the movement and momentum that crisscross a meaningful continuity.




To slowly exclude a meaningful interchange can only assign false notions predicated on undergeneralized hypotheticals.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Thu Sep 17, 2020 6:39 pm

Meno_ wrote:
Meno_ wrote:Philosophy vs. Psychology?


A lot of thought goes into the pre- eminence of psychological solutions bearing down unto it's philosophical underpinnings

Crucial ideas : such as posed by Plato, Descartes, Hegel, Nietzsche, prescribe what is to come to bear fruit in psychology.

Strains of though do actually reflect each other and transact the movement and momentum that crisscross a meaningful continuity.




To slowly exclude a meaningful interchange can only assign false notions predicated on undergeneralized hypotheticals.





The disassociated ego covered by karmic calculation is the way to go from the abyss toward the light.


As fragile the dynamic in this process can build an increasingly patently interrelated face of strength of the will to overcome it's self.


Napoleon said, that its harder to conquer the self than it is the battle.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: Philosophy is not for the faint of heart

Postby Meno_ » Wed Nov 25, 2020 4:25 am

The subject to object relationship could be dessurected by a vintage ILP forum:



'Objectivity, Obfuscation, and Mysticism.'

I could not find think but will keep on looking, the point made is general so as to delate a hidden premis- behind N''s Will to Power, (power to will) , so as to imply, and make implicitly relate that hiddenness with the emerging hypocrisy between the N's transcendent object, with Marx's social realism.

That is why we are socially reaching confusion between the subjective and objective notions that have accrued in the name of social
realism.

Personally, such latent reality plays havoc within the analogous tie in between social and personal psychology, and that is what exerborates the psychic states( that the above article brings up: )
and particularly exemplified by long standing metaphors revolving around alienation, post impressionistic narratives of cut up meanings .

That being said, there should not be an effort to demonized parties abject to these kinds of real exclusionary forces, the effects ard always contradictory to unify society.

It is unfortunate to derail mysticism as it usually is caught between social and psychological relatives that try to zero in on object relations.

And sadly, too many of 'us" are overtly aware of this, even as our inclusion of this hidden susceptible trait, becomes perceived.


But here is, where the will, can rescue us , as our power to effect our will , diminishes. This is the crux of the hardest tensions, resonating within
today's life.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 7635
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Previous

Return to Creative Writing



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users