Sue Pelosi?

[Pedro I Rengel]

Turns out high horses are incredibly cheap.

[Pedro I Rengel]

How about this Mr Reasonable But Somewhat Susceptible To Propaganda, go to breitbart and read a couple of articles. Point out to me where they missreport or missrepresent something, or fail to acknowledge their political position.

I'll wait.

[Pedro I Rengel]

Meanwhile, for the viewers at home:

[Jakob]

How about this Mr Reasonable But Somewhat Susceptible To Propaganda, go to breitbart and read a couple of articles. Point out to me where they missreport or missrepresent something, or fail to acknowledge their political position.

I'll wait.

You can wait until jar jar binx is cool and it'll still not have happened.

Andrew Breitbart was known to use pens with ink in them.

[Peter Kropotkin]

I don't believe I've read a dumber conversation
then what I am reading with Pedro and Jakob....

to sue someone you need what is called "standing" which basically
means that you must have been directly involved in the individual actions...
for example, I cannot sue the state of Texas for some pollution they
might have done because I don't live in Texas and their actions didn't affect me,
in any way, shape or form. If I fall down in someone's driveway, I cannot sue the
next door neighbor because they had nothing to do with the driveway in question....

It becomes a matter of, does the action in question somehow involve me?
if it doesn't, I have no standing to sue a senator or the president or a house
member if their actions don't affect me. Try suing the president for something,
and I can guarantee the judge will throw the case out because it keeps the president
from being bombarded by nuisance suits. Which is why Paula Jones could sue
Bill Clinton because she was personally affected by his actions, but you are not
affected and thus you can't sue.....

Kropotkin

[Pedro I Rengel]

What a pretentious fag. Has anybody ever told you that?

I didn't read any of your shit.

[Peter Kropotkin]

What a pretentious fag. Has anybody ever told you that?

I didn't read any of your shit.

K: why that is an excellent argument you have presented... so full of facts
and evidence proving your point.... jeez, I presented evidence and facts
which contradicted your point and like some snowflake, you suddenly
attack me and call me names.... What are you, two? try giving an adult
response... as for me, I have been happily married with the nicest woman
for over 22 years...… I am sorry you are angry and bitter with your life..
but hay, that isn't my problem.... I have my own problems and reading what
a snowflake you are, isn't one of them.

Kropotkin

[promethean75]

damn! a mawfucka talk to the kid like that?! break his knees, pete!

[Peter Kropotkin]

damn! a mawfucka talk to the kid like that?! break his knees, pete!

K: the problem is he is a child, a snowflake and being that delicate, I wouldn't want
to be the one who broke him.... I have empathy for others, the less fortunate
and the ones who cannot take too much pressure like Pedro.. he might suffer some
more damaging mental problem, well, more then he already has.... so, I go quietly
into the night to protect his fragile mental state.....

Kropotkin

[promethean75]

Keepin it gangsta, pete.

*fist bump*

[Peter Kropotkin]

Keepin it gangsta, pete.

*fist bump*

K: I have noted that since I have taken Pedro to task, he
hasn't been here.... yep, a snowflake...a IQ45 follower...one
who pretends to be tough, but when called out... runs away
from any situation that is uncomfortable for him......


Kropotkin

[promethean75]

well to be fair, while everyone's relative intelligence might certainly be a factor preventing any kind of sustained understanding of others in a discussion/debate, what is not relative is each person's feeling of futility in debating. so whether or not one is capable of responding intelligibly, there's a very good chance they'll feel that even trying to do so, is pointless. that each person will always blame the other for this breakdown in communication is simply a condition of the general neurosis of the philosopher and his inability to identify the inherent problems of doing philosophy.... which is a very risky kind of language game.