
Arminius wrote:Globalism means - amongst other things - the elimination of nations, of states. And the fact that we are living in a globalistic era means - as long as this era lasts - that globalism is more powerful and thus seems to win. But who knows who will really win in the end? Globalism will end someday.
Meno_ wrote:Arminius wrote:Globalism means - amongst other things - the elimination of nations, of states. And the fact that we are living in a globalistic era means - as long as this era lasts - that globalism is more powerful and thus seems to win. But who knows who will really win in the end? Globalism will end someday.
It may end but with a whimper , a thousand years is a mild estimate considering the undisputed power of an established center.
Meno_ wrote:If they develop computerized intelligence resistant to viruses causing fungal infections why not? A thousand years of empire is not unheard of. , Romans, including Charles the Great lasted way over that. An uncontested empire solving the problem with internal decay can go on way longer.
Besides all they have to do is to redefine states as an exclusive and only existing empire as a state OR state of mind.
Zero_Sum wrote:Just wait until they roll out a new digital currency worldwide. Bank on it.
Arminius wrote:Zero_Sum wrote:Just wait until they roll out a new digital currency worldwide. Bank on it.
This worldwirde currency could be called "Globo". Am I the first one with the idea of this "Globo"?
"Globo" sounds like "Euro", doesn't it?
Arminius wrote:What about a "Holy Dollar Empire of the One World Nation" as the new Thousand-Year-Empire?
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users