Group pride

[tentative]

Smears,

Have I got a deal for you! I happen to have a beautiful oak fence post that I'd be willing to part with for a nominal sum. You'd love it. You could talk to the post and it would give you better cogent responses than anything you'd get in this thread.

Uhhh... shipping is C.O.D.

[Mr Reasonable]

I'll take it.

[MagsJ]

If you think that 1000s of people taking to the streets, armed and acting like Nazis, and yelling out racist stuff is wrong, then you might be in agreement with some of the counter protesters in Charlottesville.

Like when we say "Hitler was bad, he killed all those people", and someone replies, "yeah but a lot of Nazis died in the war too". You tell that person, "yeah but the Nazis started it and they were assholes". Its common sense.

Like when Otto said 'peaceful farmers' but ignored how those peaceful farmers became peaceful farmers in the first place? and then accused me of sympathising when I pointed this out..?

I am aware of the current global racial tension, and only offer an objective view of the situation.. as I really don't care for it.

[Is_Yde_opN]

No anti-White, no White backlash.
That being said, I think it’s healthy that the West is experiencing this racial awakening.
Race is real after all and it’s a much more healthy banner to rally beneath than pathetic hedonistic consumerism.
To acknowledge the reality of race leads also to a healthy appreciation of the ethnic and traditional family structure.

Times will get tougher but there is no other way to wake man from his induced slumber.

[Ultimate Philosophy 1001]

https://i11.servimg.com/u/f11/18/24/63/29/haaret10.jpg

Anybody can google the article.

This is one of those cases where it's best not to show too much group pride in front of non-group members, Thomas Friedman knows this, smart one.

My argument is, not all Jews are evil.
Let's say the article is real, and 25 evil jews control society. Why do all Jews have to be lumped in with the evil ones?

All races are shit and garbage, whites, jews, blacks, all of the human races are shit and garbage.

I think if Hitler killed more people (as in, killed everyone on the planet) he wouldn't even be listed as such a bad person. They only hate him because he singled out one or two races.
People need to recognize that all races are shit and garbage, not just jews, but whites and blacks are also shit and garbage, they each just have their unique smell, and are shit and garbage in their own unique way. People say black cooking is the worst cooking but I have tasted white food that is the worst shit and garbage I have ever ate. I have seen White artists make aesthetics that are so bad they make graffiti on trains look like a masterpiece.
For example, Conquistadors were assholes and a garbage people, but so weren't the savage Aztecs and cannibals they slaughtered and I don't feel sorry for them at all.

I think Hitler was actually planning on killing all the races, because I know for a fact he Hated christians but pretended to be a Christian to play along.

My other point is, Jews are a fiction and fantasy, Nazis founded their ideology on fiction and fantasy, the true Aryan race started in Turkey and migrated to India and Scotland and northern africa, Germans aren't the only true aryans in this world.

Second it is unfair to call me the n-word because for all you know I could be Half northern african and not a subsaharan, and northern africans can be Aryans.

And Jews are a fantasy and fiction, they are the same genetics as Arabs, so maybe the Bible is slightly true in that Jews and arabs are decendants of 2 brothers. Basically the Jews are trying to kill off their own race, because waging a war in the middle east is wiping out their own genetic code.

[WendyDarling]

I was told that the original Jew bloodlines were wiped out ages ago and that the current Euro-Jews & American-Jews, the white ones with a majority of moolah and power, are all converts, no originals. Was I misinformed?

[Ultimate Philosophy 1001]

I was told that the original Jew bloodlines were wiped out ages ago and that the current Euro-Jews & American-Jews, the white ones with a majority of moolah and power, are all converts, no originals. Was I misinformed?

DNA evidence shows no concrete evidence of Jews actually having a real, clearly defined bloodline other than having the same genetics as Arabs.

[Is_Yde_opN]

My argument is, not all Jews are evil.

Why do you think they are evil?
The point is not that those 25 or whatever Jews directed to a great degree American policy, that’s just incidental. The more interesting aspect is that this Israeli news paper has no problem with openly discussing the political domination of Jews in goy countries. It’s because that’s normal for Jews, nothing out of the ordinary.
And that in turn is not necessarily evil, but for somebody who is not afraid of harsh truths this should open his/her eyes that not everybody is a shitlib/cuckservative at heart.
But then again, perhaps that’s what they think is something evil after all, to not be like them.

As I said somewhere else already, I’m probably much more anti-shitlib, anti-cuckservative than anti-‘semitic’.

They only hate him because he singled out one or two races.

Hitler is a big deal because he is today the symbol of White man’s will to thrive, to be openly aggressive, to think of yourself as a member of a distinct people that matter and to have aspiration beyond bug man materialism.
A threat to the current elite and bug men.

Spiritual death comes before the physical death of a people.



As for Jews, there are different genetic lineages which constitute the Jews today.
But that doesn’t mean that they are not guarding their genetic qualities and let anybody become a Jew, it’s a matrilineal system, after all.
I wonder what they think of Ivanka, will they reject her children eventually once she has lost her usefulness or will they allow her genes to become part of the tribe.

[Is_Yde_opN]

I wonder what will be the next mass psychological phenomenon after people have moved past the anti-White narrative.

[Ultimate Philosophy 1001]

I wonder what will be the next mass psychological phenomenon after people have moved past the anti-White narrative.

Second half of the video was better than the first, also the guy could have shortened the video to only 5 minutes.

The key to understanding the Anti-white narrative is empathy. Empathy for people like, me, I am half-black, if segregation was real where would I go?
I am a noble, selfless leader, I will accept if I don't belong with the whites, I will move to Africa for the greater good, long as I am made the ruler of Africa and overseer of the civilization of the Africans.
I am not 100% sure I belong with the whites, I am a self-less mercenary without a home, a noble agent of fortune, but I am 100% damn sure I don't belong with the blacks.
Now the key to understanding the AntiWhite narrative is that they focus on people like me, the Henry's in Eureka, the one black who isn't a nigger and doesn't belong with the niggers, they say "Oh well if there's a black who is a genius, segregation will ruin their careers" etc. And their whole minds focus on the one black who isn't a nigger, and they obsess about it and eventually their whole thought patterns revolve around it, eventually they start to imagine all blacks as bunch of geniuses, oppressed by the white establishment, in the back of their minds all blacks are these innocent, oppressed geniuses oppressed by evil whitey, and they no longer see blacks as a bunch of utter blithering retards which most of them actually are.

I mean, maybe not all blacks have to africa, maybe we could keep the good artists or the smart ones, but seriously this nigger breeding has to stop, unless you want a 1000 years of hipsters YOLO fonts and generally a regressed society 200,000 years of evolution down the drain. Niggers are basically breeding machines, like they pump out babies like some kind of videogame alien creature, like the Flood from Halo. I have to admit, there is something sexy about how sexual it all is. I can see why all the old presidents fucked their black women, I would too, I won't lie.

[MagsJ]

This is one of those cases where it's best not to show too much group pride in front of non-group members, Thomas Friedman knows this, smart one.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.. be the change you want to see.

[Is_Yde_opN]

This is one of those cases where it's best not to show too much group pride in front of non-group members, Thomas Friedman knows this, smart one.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.. be the change you want to see.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.... be the change you want to see.

[MagsJ]

This is one of those cases where it's best not to show too much group pride in front of non-group members, Thomas Friedman knows this, smart one.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.. be the change you want to see.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.... be the change you want to see.

[captaincrunk]

I was told that the original Jew bloodlines were wiped out ages ago and that the current Euro-Jews & American-Jews, the white ones with a majority of moolah and power, are all converts, no originals. Was I misinformed?

Jews were never very interested in converting people. They're genetically distinct in many ways. Easiest way to see it is their predisposition for several diseases like cystic fibrosis.

EDIT: Holy hell there are some racists fucks in here

[Pandora]

Recently came across this heart medication commercial. How isn’t Entresto (Novartis) not racist by pointing out that black patients are more likely to have angioedema (@3:40) by taking it? Aren’t we all the same? Imagine what would happen if they mentioned Jewish people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoMHiPbqQ0A&sns=em

[captaincrunk]

Recently came across this heart medication commercial. How isn’t Entresto (Novartis) not racist by pointing out that black patients are more likely to have angioedema (@3:40) by taking it? Aren’t we all the same? Imagine what would happen if they mentioned Jewish people.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoMHiPbqQ0A&sns=em

No one I know thinks this is racist but you.

[surreptitious75]

Please dont tell me that you actually think certain facts are racist just because they happen to reference a certain demographic
To take you upon that ridiculous reasoning if I said that six million Jews died in the Holocaust would that mean I am anti semitic

[Pandora]

I say it’s racial discrimination! All races, being equal, should have equal medical care if they pay the same price for the service. To design medicine that puts a specific race in disadvantage while taking it is to racially and willingly discriminate against that race!

Boycott racist pharma companies until they produce equal medicine for all!

[surreptitious75]

All races being equal under law or in principle does not mean they have the same medical needs. For example sub Saharan Africans
are four times more likely to have sickle cell anaemia than all other races that do. And there is a genetic component to this because
it is a hereditary disease passed down from parent to child so therefore taking account of that is not racist just good medical practice

[Pandora]

...just good medical practice

apparently not good enough if you have to admit racial qualitative differences in a society that bans racial discrimination.

[Zero_Sum]

...just good medical practice

apparently not good enough if you have to admit racial qualitative differences in a society that bans racial discrimination.

Different races just means different sub species of human beings but many take this as a negative description even when necessarily it isn't. So, we're stuck with political correctness that we're all the same even when medical institutions point out the obvious contradictions of that.

[MagsJ]

This is one of those cases where it's best not to show too much group pride in front of non-group members, Thomas Friedman knows this, smart one.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.. be the change you want to see.

Don't flatter yourself, dear.

It seems that most but you, are content with their lives/their lot, or, as they say.... be the change you want to see.

G'wan Europe!

Don't you just love politics, and the necessary changes it can bring with it.

Does group pride ALWAYS have to come at the detriment of other groups, or can it exist without having to? Can it exist without the element of hate and underlying racist connotations, or is it only multi-racials that can experience that notion?

[Inconvenient Reality]

Does group pride ALWAYS have to come at the detriment of other groups, or can it exist without having to? Can it exist without the element of hate and underlying racist connotations, or is it only multi-racials that can experience that notion?

Why would it be any different than human nature? It's like being on a sports team. You and your teammates don't have to hate other teams; you likely don't truly hate any or many of the individual players on other teams. You are probably friends with people on other teams or play on the same team in another sport, and you may even fraternize with individuals on another team. You or your teammates may hate some players on other teams that play a certain way, or whom you have history with. Sure, you or your teammates may also hate another team just for being another team. The one thing about competitive anything is that of course, when it comes down to it, you are in it for #1 above all else. Of course you want to see your teammates happy, of course you want to accomplish great things in the sports season, and of course you want a trophy.

If you consider winning a match to be working to the detriment on the other team(s), then sure, by that definition humans are all horrible creatures and those who are so enlightened to this fact should employ the fullest force of government sanctioned drugging, imprisonment, persuasion and brute force necessary to change human nature.... For our own good of course. [/sarc] The point being that the question of "why are there matches to begin with, why are there teams to begin with, and why do we have to "win" to begin with or keep score to begin with" is irrelevant to this discussion insofar as to be better relegated to a separate discussion of either religion or evolutionary psychology depending on your persuasion.

What you perceive as "always" or "detriment" is subjective, and likely says something about the sources of information that you digest, or your own "detrimental" ideas of others or your own biases. For example, your bias towards mixed individuals is evident. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that some of the people you might be inclined to call biased, racist or or claim to be working to the detriment of others may actually be as level-headed as you believe mixed individuals to be and it is your own filters preventing you from listening to or understanding what they are actually saying.

[MagsJ]

Does group pride ALWAYS have to come at the detriment of other groups, or can it exist without having to? Can it exist without the element of hate and underlying racist connotations, or is it only multi-racials that can experience that notion?

Why would it be any different than human nature? It's like being on a sports team. You and your teammates don't have to hate other teams; you likely don't truly hate any or many of the individual players on other teams. You are probably friends with people on other teams or play on the same team in another sport, and you may even fraternize with individuals on another team. You or your teammates may hate some players on other teams that play a certain way, or whom you have history with. Sure, you or your teammates may also hate another team just for being another team. The one thing about competitive anything is that of course, when it comes down to it, you are in it for #1 above all else. Of course you want to see your teammates happy, of course you want to accomplish great things in the sports season, and of course you want a trophy.

So the team is your own kind.. not like minds? or would they make the team on the basis of being like minds?

If you consider winning a match to be working to the detriment on the other team(s), then sure, by that definition humans are all horrible creatures and those who are so enlightened to this fact should employ the fullest force of government sanctioned drugging, imprisonment, persuasion and brute force necessary to change human nature.... For our own good of course. [/sarc] The point being that the question of "why are there matches to begin with, why are there teams to begin with, and why do we have to "win" to begin with or keep score to begin with" is irrelevant to this discussion insofar as to be better relegated to a separate discussion of either religion or evolutionary psychology depending on your persuasion.

I find sport a child-like passtime, but I don't disagree that it's fun to watch, as I guess that someone's got to entertain the masses by any means necessary.

What you perceive as "always" or "detriment" is subjective, and likely says something about the sources of information that you digest, or your own "detrimental" ideas of others or your own biases. For example, your bias towards mixed individuals is evident. Perhaps you should consider the possibility that some of the people you might be inclined to call biased, racist or or claim to be working to the detriment of others may actually be as level-headed as you believe mixed individuals to be and it is your own filters preventing you from listening to or understanding what they are actually saying.

It is not about what others say, but about how they go about doing things.. so not so much about bias, as it is about ethics.. or is ethics based on bias in your mind?

[Mimisbrunnr]

So the team is your own kind.. not like minds? or would they make the team on the basis of being like minds?

What makes you think the two are mutually exclusive?

I find sport a child-like passtime, but I don't disagree that it's fun to watch, as I guess that someone's got to entertain the masses by any means necessary.

Nice deflection. Science denier. Lol.

It is not about what others say, but about how they go about doing things.. so not so much about bias, as it is about ethics.. or is ethics based on bias in your mind?

You are assuming that your interpretation of how they are going about doing something is a rational or factual interpretation. I think that was the point.