Moderator: Carleas
Urwrongx1000 wrote:I believe you only need to vote 'Yes' and it changes your previous vote.
Ierrellus wrote:Can I change my vote from no to yes? I've had my fill of this fool.
Ichthus77 wrote:I don’t see the point in banning anyone ever. They can just come back as a different user, right?
All that involves is deleting someone’s post, not banning them.
Magnus Anderson wrote:All that involves is deleting someone’s post, not banning them.
Deleting someone's post is a weak sort of punishment. Moreover, it breaks the integrity of the forum.
Urwrongx1000 wrote:I petition to ban Users from threatening violence and to kill people. It's common sense, as philosophy forums do not allow pedophilia for example.
Sculptor wrote:I love the way the Americans - supporters of free speech want to ban someone.
Says a lot about how fake the US notion of themselves is.
gib wrote:Sculptor wrote:I love the way the Americans - supporters of free speech want to ban someone.
Says a lot about how fake the US notion of themselves is.
Why do you take a few ILP members who want to ban you as representatives of America overall?
And again, why do you assume they want to ban you solely because they don't like your speech?
gib wrote:Sculptor wrote:I love the way the Americans - supporters of free speech want to ban someone.
Says a lot about how fake the US notion of themselves is.
Why do you take a few ILP members who want to ban you as representatives of America overall?
And again, why do you assume they want to ban you solely because they don't like your speech?
Sculptor wrote:I am directly criticising those American who all claim to support free speach whilst a that same time supporting a thread to ban someone.
Sculptor wrote:What they think of my posts in neither here nor there.
Sculptor wrote:I wonder if your inability to read and understand, it indicative of the American educational system, which offers the world to lowest literacy rate in the western world.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users