But like any good jalopy pilot, I executed a remarkable feet feat of duct tape and we should be smooth sailing now. Or at least status-quo sailing.
Carry on.

[EDIT: duct taped a word]
Moderator: Carleas
But like any good jalopy pilot, I executed a remarkable feet of duct tape and we should be smooth sailing now. Or at least status-quo sailing.
Carry on.
MagsJ wrote:What kind of Bot was that @ Carleas?
MagsJ wrote:Please permaban me, thank you.
iambiguous wrote:MagsJ wrote:Please permaban me, thank you.
Hmm, is this for real? And, if so, is it about anything in particular? Or, instead, as will come upon most of us here from time time, has the whole feckin experience become just unbearable?
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:MagsJ wrote:Please permaban me, thank you.
Hmm, is this for real? And, if so, is it about anything in particular? Or, instead, as will come upon most of us here from time time, has the whole feckin experience become just unbearable?
Too many sock-puppets, ergo lies/liars = lack of integrity.. I can’t stomach that anymore.
Worse than any posting bot.
MagsJ wrote:![]()
You suggest that I do what? lol
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:MagsJ wrote:Please permaban me, thank you.
Hmm, is this for real? And, if so, is it about anything in particular? Or, instead, as will come upon most of us here from time time, has the whole feckin experience become just unbearable?
Too many sock-puppets, ergo lies/liars = lack of integrity.. I can’t stomach that anymore.
Worse than any posting bot.
I believe she changed her mind, but I second this suggestion, whether staying or leaving.Peter Kropotkin wrote:
K: If you are really leaving, then leave with guns blazing.. Name names...
tell it like it is.... and don't hold back.... leave it all out there......
Kropotkin
iambiguous wrote:Not to worry. Lots of people here are in denial.
And not all of them have a "condition".
Karpel Tunnel wrote:I believe she changed her mind, but I second this suggestion, whether staying or leaving.Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: If you are really leaving, then leave with guns blazing.. Name names...
tell it like it is.... and don't hold back.... leave it all out there......
Kropotkin
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:Not to worry. Lots of people here are in denial.
And not all of them have a "condition".
I’m not in denial.. you’re suggestions and I, just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a really bad DJ.I think I’ll put that in my Sig.. I like it.
![]()
Condition or not.. posting in bad faith and spite, by always using conjecture, is simply a (dull and boring) fallacious argument, that Someone likes to use, to try to gain ground and traction by that method. Others here.. not so much.
iambiguous wrote:To paraphrase myself, "You'll need a context, of course."
That way you can note more specifically when, as the exchange unfolds, posters are acting in bad faith...or using fallacious arguments. And the posters can then defend themselves in turn.
And, over and again, all posters will refer back to that particular set of circumstances in order to illustrate and to bolster any accusations that they make.
I'll start the thread if you'd like. In the philosophy forum of course.
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:To paraphrase myself, "You'll need a context, of course."
That way you can note more specifically when, as the exchange unfolds, posters are acting in bad faith...or using fallacious arguments. And the posters can then defend themselves in turn.
I take issue, more with sock-puppets, than with anything else.. that’s posting in bad faith, to me.
And, over and again, all posters will refer back to that particular set of circumstances in order to illustrate and to bolster any accusations that they make.
I'll start the thread if you'd like. In the philosophy forum of course.
MagsJ wrote: ..only as long as you don’t use the phrase “..interactions that revolve around conflicting goods in which we connect the dots between morality here and now and immortality there and then”, or any variation or derivative there-of.. otherwise, sure.
iambiguous wrote:So, if you are still interested..
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:So, if you are still interested..
I am not.
Jakeyjake wrote:Are the active users at the bottom of the page who have bot in parentheses actual bots?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users