This article is from a Jewish apologist website (it's hard to find articles from truly unbiased websites, since google has been subsidized by government and subverted, curtailing free speech), but nonetheless I'm going to use it to make a point.
https://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-arts-and-culture/273591/hanebrink-judeo-bolshevismIt’s the bad luck of the Jews, and a persistent shonde, that some of the most notorious Communists were members of the tribe: “Iron Lazar” Kaganovich, Stalin’s brutal henchman; Jakub Berman, head of the Polish secret police; Romania’s Ana Pauker (“Stalin in a skirt”); and of course Exhibit A, Leon Trotsky. Like most of the other Red firebrands, Lev Davidovich Bronstein declared his Jewish identity meaningless. But maybe it wasn’t. For one thing, Communism promised to solve the Jewish question in a way that other movements could not. World revolution, unlike Bundism and Zionism (both more popular options among Eastern European Jews), offered an escape from Jewishness in the name of universal humanity, and at the same time satisfied the classically Jewish prophetic urge.
It shouldn’t be verboten to speak of a certain Jewish aptitude for Communism. The historian Yuri Slezkine busted that taboo in his masterwork The Jewish Century when he suggested that the notorious image of the Jewish commissar was more than just an anti-Semitic smear. Jews combined “relentless rationalism and exuberant messianism” and so made excellent revolutionaries, Slezkine wrote. Slezkine sensibly remarked that “most radicals were not Jews and most Jews were not radicals, but the proportion of radicals among Jews was, on average, much higher than among their non-Jewish neighbors.” Seven out of 10 members of the original leadership of the Polish Communist movement were Jewish, and in the 1930s Jews made up about 65 percent of all Warsaw Communists, 75 percent of the Polish Party’s propaganda apparatus, and 90 percent of MOPR, Poland’s international Communist relief organization. We can keep such facts in mind, Slezkine argued, and still avoid sliding into the anti-Semitic slander that Bolshevism was a Jewish plot.
The revolutionary spirit that seized some Jews and many more non-Jews in the early years of the 20th century has led to all kinds of trouble, not least for the Jews themselves. In the early 20th century, Slezkine wrote, Jews looked like a vanguard people, modernity incarnate. But a trapdoor loomed for the Jews: Modernity now meant nationalism, the new opiate of the people, “states that posed as tribes.” A head-on collision resulted between nationalism and the Jews in which the latter suddenly looked like the enemies of the newly chosen people, the Germans, Poles, Hungarians, and Romanians. Despite the Jews’ strenuous devotion to the national gentile cultures, their love for Goethe, Mickiewicz, Petöfi, they were still suspect, rootless aliens. Jews came to represent the evil, corrosive side of modernity, string-pullers of international capital and media, and worst of all, ready to destroy one’s nation in the name of global Communism.
Enter the myth of Judeo-Bolshevism, capably explored by Paul Hanebrink in his new book, A Specter Haunting Europe. For many Europeans in the late 1910s, the face of Communist revolution was Jewish. Short-lived revolutions swept across Eastern and Central Europe in the wake of the Bolshevik coup, and many of the leaders were Jews or half-Jews, like Hungary’s Bela Kun and Bavaria’s Kurt Eisner. Like Rosa Luxemburg in Berlin, Eisner was no Bolshevik, but that didn’t matter. After these revolutions collapsed, Jews were blamed for the chaos and bloodshed.
Granted, Jews were overrepresented in a few Communist regimes. There is still a huge leap between this fact and the anti-Semitic notion, sharply on the rise in today’s Eastern Europe, that “the Jews” were responsible for Communism, and that they should be unmasked as aggressors, not merely innocent victims of the Nazis.
Rosa Luxemburg wasn't a Bolshevik, but only because she was a German Jew, not a Russian Jew.
She was still a communist.
No one denies Jews were vastly overrepresented in European and Russian communism.
The question is, was the majority of communist leadership in Europe and Russia Jewish?
At the very least, Jews made up a large minority of the leadership, like 20-30%, if not the majority of the leadership.
And the founders of the movement were Jewish.
So if Jews didn't exist, neither would communism, or at least its most successful variant, Marxism, and without Jewish leadership, it wouldn't've been anywhere near as successful in Europe and Russia as it was, it may've never took off at all, and if it didn't take off in Europe and Russia, it wouldn't've taken off in the 3rd world.
Are all Muslims terrorists?
Are all terrorists Muslims?
No, but so what?
Per capita they commit more terrorism than anyone else.
If you deport Muslims, per capita terrorism substantially declines.
Likewise if you deport Jews, per capita communism in addition to anticonservatism, antinationalism (because these people aren't just unconservative and unnationalistic, they're anticonservative and antinationalistic) and crony capitalism substantially decline.
Furthermore, just because not every Muslim commits terrorism, doesn't mean many or most of them don't support it, one way or another.
Not every Jew commits communism, but many or most of them supported it, or some other scheme to erode our monetary, national and social integrity.
Jews love ideologies, but one ideology they never get into is nationalism (save their own nationalism, Zionism).
They like international crony socialism and libertarianism, but not national socialism and libertarianism, especially ethnonational, for they're an ungrateful minority, and they do everything to undermine it.
They resent others having their own home, because until recently they haven't had one.
Furthermore they require unrestricted access to our home to siphon its resources.
