Fundamental Ontological Censorship

[Guide]

The anti-human censorship on this site is unconstrained. And evidence of it is continually erased. So far as I know no disciplinary action has been taken to move towards a remediation of this hideous circumstance. The site is wholly unsupervised. And so open constructive discussion is shut down in advance.

[Prismatic567]

Every philosophical discussion site including this one has their good, bad and ugly.
From more than 15 years of discussion in various forums, this the best site i.e. 90% good, 5% bad and 5% ugly.

If you have provided clear propositions supported with evidences and sound arguments, I don't see any reason for any moderator to intervene.

Most of the time I missed the intended purpose of your OP and posts, I tried to participate but then you complain I am off point, got it wrong.
Actually the problem is you are not clear with your thesis or problem statement.

I suggest you present you OP in the following format:

Thesis: You main issue, topic or proposition
Arguments and supporting evidences as follow:
.....
.....

Example:
Thesis: Kant Claimed the Noumenon aka Thing-in-itself is illusory
Arguments and supporting evidence:
I will provide supporting quotes from Kant's CPR and
present the necessary arguments.

[Carleas]

Moved to Meta, as this is a discussion of site policy. Also locked, because this appears to be redundant of this thread.