I received, among others of a like crack-pot charter, the following fraudulent and revealing of an irregularly mentally lost individual, private message, sent on behalf of the forum by the mental somnambulist "MagsJ" (in appearance [so far as anyone can ascertain]: hired without meeting the unknown owners):
"From: MagsJ
To: Guide
Guide wrote:
For some reason the myriad-teaming cesspool synonymous with the user "MagsJ", excreted this foolishness to me in private message (further cementing my view that this forum is beneath the level of intelligent discussion, producing sour fruit from the stalk of facile eristics and peculiarly feeble-minded disease of mind).
Guide wrote:
No. “Guide” means the same as in Tarkovsky’s “Stalker”, one who is a respondent of the circumstance. It is this authority, of the circumstance, that the stalker is honed into.
The change in the meaning of that word over time, would still make a stalker a stalker, for that is what he effectively is.. just not in male eyes, it seems.
I see where your posts have lead.. the initial harsh tones giving way for, and belying, a romanticism in you. Were you ever a fan of the movement?
Guide,
Personal attack threads against Mods are not encouraged, and this thread will therefore be removed from public view, and any such similar threads will gain you a second and further warning/s.
As a female, reading your post on the meaning of the origination of the word 'stalker' did not sit right with me upon first reading it, but I thought that I would reply to your post further in a DM, to investigate the (unsettling) subject matter further, and why you would choose it out of all the words and the books to choose from in the world.