Moderator: Carleas
Silhouette wrote:I'm currently neither for or against anti-semitism. Given my limited knowledge of Jews and Judaism, more evidence is needed to sway me either way, but more importantly to me it's never seemed like evidence either way would be that valuable or interesting in the grand scheme of things. I don't think everything is worth taking a stance on, such as whether or not tinfoil hats really do protect your head in any way.
Either way, any anti-semitism seems to me like an altogether different issue to whether or not it's acceptable to spam somebody else's youtube videos on one of the main forums with little (in this case nothing) to say for yourself. Give the latter a fancy (relatively) contemporary and "super-edgy" pop-culture name like "red-pilling" or not, it's still far from what the main forums are currently supposed to be for (though a new section could be considered?) and isn't even an issue of free speech like I already argued. But whether or not you agree with the former, IT IS a violation of free speech to attempt to silence potentially offensive views.
That's the thing about free speech and open debate - the content of the views and whether you like them is irrelevant (though better quality is preferred at least as any conversation about them develops), but the style of the views does matter.
To quit the forum because you can't understand any of these distinctions is retarded.
now, how is someone calling for the death of Jews, any different
to the Jews? you cannot allow for speech, any speech to be tolerated
if it calls for or demands death to or violence to any person, people,
race, creed, color, sexual orientation..... because of history,
we know that violence has been acted upon people because
of race, creed, color, sexual orientation....
WendyDarling wrote:Peter wrotenow, how is someone calling for the death of Jews, any different
to the Jews? you cannot allow for speech, any speech to be tolerated
if it calls for or demands death to or violence to any person, people,
race, creed, color, sexual orientation..... because of history,
we know that violence has been acted upon people because
of race, creed, color, sexual orientation....
Quote where this is being done on ILP.
Thanathots wrote:ILP is indeed fascist, and not in a cool way.
Why did I receive two warnings and then a ban for images? Are images not allowed here?
ILP rules don't make any sense, it's like the mods just roll a dice on when to give a warning to fuck with people.
Silhouette wrote:Personally, I'm fine with anti-Semitism being discussed, both for and against, just the same as any topic. You don't have to be funny or post pictures of stereotypes or anything special just because it's a taboo. Just talk about it as you would any other subject... it's not hard.
Fixed Cross wrote:The sandbox is public view. The Rant house is not.
Carleas wrote:Thanathots, you know why you were banned, you just don't like it.
Thanathots wrote:ILP is indeed fascist, and not in a cool way.
Why did I receive two warnings and then a ban for images? Are images not allowed here?
ILP rules don't make any sense, it's like the mods just roll a dice on when to give a warning to fuck with people.
Thanathots wrote:No, what confused me was that the images were removed but the links stayed. Why? I mean, I can kind of see why the first image was removed, but the 3 in the other post were just facts in image form.
I expected that either all of it would be removed, or none.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users