Moderator: Carleas
Meno_ wrote:We can understand , we don't need a picture.
And we must understand without that image,
And we must place ourselves into a position to understand without that image.(otherwise we will be placed there)
Otherwise the Object to that whole endeavor is lost, for ever and a day. Or, even before that day comes around.
This is no trifle matter, and the likelihood for them to assert that they are abandoned, is a refrain too common to let go.
Hence the blinding effect of 'patches.
Ichthus77 wrote:Placed where?
Who is abandoned?
Abandoned by whom?
Meno_ wrote:Ichthus77 wrote:Placed where?
Who is abandoned?
Abandoned by whom?
Placed into a position of simulation, where the ground can not be supported by any confirmed image.
("Blessed are those who believe without seeing")- This 'image less image does not give sufficient 'sustainable ground' to reconstruct a viable Object (of God)
Ichthus77 wrote:Christ was/is the prophesied sum of the Law & the Prophets, & 1 Corinthians 13:9-12 still gets all my yesses.
9 For we know in part and we prophesy in part, 10 but when completeness comes, what is in part disappears. 11 When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put the ways of childhood behind me. 12 For now we see only a reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.
Ichthus77 wrote:I love Kant & Descartes. & Kierkegaard… but I think that leap is not as dramatic as some characterize it. Vague memory.
my brain is full up lol
Meno_ wrote:Well, I'm back
It was brief, but the other guy told me it was time to come back, and the time away did give me somewhat of a new, refreshing outlook, and on account of it I'm a changed person, ready to tackle the various things which present themselves , to tackle in addition with ......
Users browsing this forum: No registered users