Moderator: Dan~
Aegean wrote:Greatest I am wrote:Aegean wrote:When a Negro is hated he claims it is became of his race.
A woman thinks it's because she is too strong, or too beautiful.
And how would Jews explain animosity going back to the Romans?
After over 100 expulsions, how do they explain it?
Envy.
Part of the victim psychology is too seek a cause in other, before, if ever, one seeks it in one's self.
In fact, one exclusively seeks it in another.
God. Perhaps the universe, if nobody alive is to be blamed.
This is what identifies nihilists of any hue.
They are always the victim of another's weakness.
Interesting but I see no answer relating to the O.P.
I am looking at the perpetrators and not the victims.
Regards
DL
Yeah, but speaking the forbidden truth will get me banned, whereas you repeating the convectional 'mythology' will get you praise.
Do you really want me to tell you why and how?
It's right in front of you, but you've been brainwashed to a degree that you do not even dare to see what is obvious.
Why, I ask, insinuatingly, were they expelled over 130 times?
Why are the same things said about them since Roman times?
Do you want quotes, or can you google them on your own?
Why, and how, are they currently dominating the US?
superior intellect?
Let's use a formula.
If a group is over-represented in crucial fields of mass manipulation - let's say by 60% above its numbers, then the excess must be equal to the degree of its superiority, right?
If not, then what other explanation can be considered to explain the discrepancy?
Nepotism, might be one.
Karpel Tunnel wrote:Yes, no one ever hates the Jews because of envy. Oh...wait a minute, that would mean it cuts more than one way.
But that's complicated. Acknowledging complexity makes one look weak.
And note the victim stance in the post two up.
Just because someone presents themselves as always satisfied and not concerned and not insulted and unaffected
doesn't hide the victim stance.
And when two of them meet, their posts end up like this...
Oh, you think I care about what you just said.
Oh, you think I care that you don't care.
Oh, you think......
and so on.
Label it a brothel, but keep going there. Call them whores. But keep coming back. Like a john isn't just a whore who doesn't get paid for being a whore.
He'll have to work harder to get banned.
And to be interesting.
Aegean wrote:Is it not easier to say "They hate me because they envy me" than to seek the source in your own self?
So easy, in fact, that every man-child and little girls, ever teased in school has used it.
So easy that the morons in the US are told that the terrorist attack the US because they are jealous of her freedoms and wealth.
So easy, simpletons will accept it.
and why not, right/
It both explains another's negative behaviour and ti self-flatters...and self-flattery si the root of degeneracy.
No, this is not philosophy...this is religion.
You fucked up half-wits.
Whenever you wonder why the world si so crazy and fucked up, look no further than your own reflection.
Aegean wrote:Really?
So reality is relative to the individual?
A subjectivist, are you?
It pleases you to explain anti-Jewishness as a product of envy, so no other explanation will do.
By the way, hypocrite, not all Jews are Semites...and not all Semites are Jews.
In fact most Semites are not Jews. Judaism is an ideology, a meme - that is attempting to become genetic.
Never doubt yourself, hypocrite. Stick to what feels right.
Never doubt your own delusions.
Remain a minion.
The predictable does not require your agreement.
As if you do the latter in relation to reactions to you. LOL.Aegean wrote:
Is it not easier to say "They hate me because they envy me" than to seek the source in your own self?
Greatest I am wrote:Who said I was a Jew?
What an idiot. Go away. You have lost all credibility.
Regards
DL
felix dakat wrote:In addition to the New Testament passages cited by iambiguous above, the phrase "the Jews" is almost always used in a negative sense in the Gospel of John. Check out this passage:
John 8:31-44 Easy-to-Read Version (ERV)
31 So Jesus said to the Jews who believed in him, “If you continue to accept and obey my teaching, you are really my followers. 32 You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
33 They answered, “We are Abraham’s descendants. And we have never been slaves. So why do you say that we will be free?”
34 Jesus said, “The truth is, everyone who sins is a slave—a slave to sin. 35 A slave does not stay with a family forever. But a son belongs to the family forever. 36 So if the Son makes you free, you are really free. 37 I know you are Abraham’s descendants. But you want to kill me, because you don’t want to accept my teaching. 38 I am telling you what my Father has shown me. But you do what your father has told you.”
39 They said, “Our father is Abraham.”
Jesus said, “If you were really Abraham’s descendants, you would do what Abraham did. 40 I am someone who has told you the truth I heard from God. But you are trying to kill me. Abraham did nothing like that. 41 So you are doing what your own father did.”
But they said, “We are not like children who never knew who their father was. God is our Father. He is the only Father we have.”
42 Jesus said to them, “If God were really your Father, you would love me. I came from God, and now I am here. I did not come by my own authority. God sent me. 43 You don’t understand the things I say, because you cannot accept my teaching. 44 Your father is the devil. You belong to him. You want to do what he wants. He was a murderer from the beginning. He was always against the truth. There is no truth in him. He is like the lies he tells. Yes, the devil is a liar. He is the father of lies.
Or some Jews. Or a mob of Jews whipped up by some elite Jews. I don't think it matters, really. Most groups will turn to violence at some level if you challenge notions dear to them. Some groups have ideologies that make it seem like it is incumbant on you, to do it right now, yourself, preferably with your hands or fire or stones or something.felix dakat wrote:
It was the Romans not the Jews who were responsible for the crucifixion and historical analysis supports the hypothesis that the New Testament texts downplay the responsibility of the Romans for Jesus' crucifixion and exaggerate the role of the Jews.
Karpel Tunnel wrote:Or some Jews. Or a mob of Jews whipped up by some elite Jews. I don't think it matters, really. Most groups will turn to violence at some level if you challenge notions dear to them. Some groups have ideologies that make it seem like it is incumbant on you, to do it right now, yourself, preferably with your hands or fire or stones or something.felix dakat wrote:
It was the Romans not the Jews who were responsible for the crucifixion and historical analysis supports the hypothesis that the New Testament texts downplay the responsibility of the Romans for Jesus' crucifixion and exaggerate the role of the Jews.
Whenever you wonder why the world si so crazy and fucked up, look no further than your own reflection.
What applies to you does not necessarily apply to others or me.
Arcturus Descending wrote:Greatest I Am,
Aegean wrote:Whenever you wonder why the world si so crazy and fucked up, look no further than your own reflection.
GIA wrote:What applies to you does not necessarily apply to others or me.
I can, at least in part, go along with what Aegean said above. I see truth within the words. We humans are far from perfect and we are all responsible to some degree to how crazy and messed up this world of ours is. We do not have to be terrorists or murderers, et cetera, in order for us to see how much each of us personally and separately have contributed to the chaos around us. I myself am no saint and I am flawed.
We sometimes have a problem with "seeing" and taking responsibility for our part in things whether through action or non action. Why? Perhaps because then we would have to look at a reflection of who we really are and not one of who we believe ourselves to be. We all have a bit of Dorian Gray within us.
I do not assume to know exactly what Aegean meant by that but on the other side of that, there is a saying, simply put, which goes "What you see is who you are". (paraphrased).
Arcturus Descending wrote:Greatest I Am,
Be as Marcus Aurelius was.
If you learn that someone is speaking ill of you, don’t try to defend yourself against the rumours; respond instead with, ‘Yes, and he doesn’t know the half of it, because he could have said more’.
Marcus Aurelius
True that.
They do not know the depth of my hate for their type of evil.
They would fear me more than god if they knew.
Arcturus Descending wrote:Greatest I Am,True that.
They do not know the depth of my hate for their type of evil.
They would fear me more than god if they knew.
Evil is a very strong word. What evil are you speaking of, pointing to here?
When you speak of the "depth of my hate" one might conjure up the word "evil" within those words.
You are a part of the problem if you are not a part of the solution. How has hating solved your problem?
promethean75 wrote:Well if I may, DL, I'd say the object of your disgust is not the silly crap of the Bible that was written and believed by the people of that period... nor that those people practiced those conventions and institutions mentioned in the Bible you so loathe. It was, after all, what seemed normal to them.
Rather what disgusts you is that people today still use the Bible for something other than a pack of rolling papers (ever rolled a joint with a Bible page? bro) or to prop up the back leg of an unsteady washing machine.
That's what's got you all heated, I think. How long it is taking homo-dumbass to evolve intellectually and grow up. 'course you gotta also keep in mind that this slow evolution isn't totally natural. There are forces that are intentionally trying to sabotage it so everybody remains a dumbass willing to work an eight hour day for some other dipshit.
Return to Religion and Spirituality
Users browsing this forum: No registered users