Urwrongx1000 wrote:there are mountains of evidence of voter fraud, and here u are surprised the dnc wont let it air to light, duh
Mr Reasonable wrote:scotus has to follow the laws bruh
Mr Reasonable wrote:the alternative electors are not actually electors
Mr Reasonable wrote:scotus has to follow the laws bruh if u dont have standing to sue then the law is that you cannot sue lol u want scotus to break the law
the alternative electors are not actually electors they are just dummies putting on a show for u lol
Pedro I Rengel wrote:Mr Reasonable wrote:scotus has to follow the laws bruh if u dont have standing to sue then the law is that you cannot sue lol u want scotus to break the law
the alternative electors are not actually electors they are just dummies putting on a show for u lol
They made that shit up.
If the outcome of an election has national consequences, then obviously a state or a person outside of the states where fraud happened can sue. That's why it's being taken to the scotus of the USA, because it's a national case.
If a federal law is broken in Indiana, someone from California can still sue you.
They made that shit up.
Pedro I Rengel wrote:These are none of these still arguments.
Mr Reasonable wrote:scotus has to follow the laws bruh if u dont have standing to sue then the law is that you cannot sue lol u want scotus to break the law
the alternative electors are not actually electors they are just dummies putting on a show for u lol
Users browsing this forum: No registered users