Peter Kropotkin wrote:I don't watch video's but are you referring to the all ready
discredited laptop left in New jersey?
obsrvr524 wrote:Peter Kropotkin wrote:I don't watch video's but are you referring to the all ready
discredited laptop left in New jersey?
Who discredited it? Where are YOUR references?
Peter Kropotkin wrote:what references I can refer to?
Kropotkin
Peter Kropotkin wrote:trust me, would I lie to you?
Kropotkin
Peter Kropotkin wrote:ok, let me tell you a story... see how much of it seems to be
credible in any, way, shape or form.....
and this fact is important to the story.... Hunter Biden lives in L.A.
in California... remember this as I tell the story....
so, a guy in a one man computer shop in NEW JERSEY, says, that
Hunter Biden or some surrogate, drops off an Laptop and leaves it there..
doesn't leave a name or phone number or address with the laptop...
the guy says he can't identify who dropped off the laptop because he
is... wait for it......legally blind....so Biden whose dad is running for the
president of the United States of America, has decided to drop off a laptop
3,000 miles away from his home to a random shop owned by a legally blind
owner in NEW JERSEY... and you would think that Hunter could have dropped off
the laptop at any one of the thousands of computer places between CA and NJ
or perhaps he would have simply had someone in the DNC take care of it,
or even taken it to an official government repair shop?
Peter Kropotkin wrote:so, the legally blind owner of this one man computer shop in NJ...
decides to open up the computer and see what is on it....
yah, sure, I see that being credible, NOT
Peter Kropotkin wrote:....and because it is encrypted,
he was able to hack into the laptop... where he see's e-mails and
video's allegedly of Hunter Biden.... so he suddenly, rather remarkable,
being legally blind and all, recognizes Hunter Biden...
Peter Kropotkin wrote:He calls Rudy Giuliani for help because that is what everyone would
do with a laptop like this? the laptop finds its way to the FBI..
Peter Kropotkin wrote:the FBI is unable to hack into this laptop..
and goes back to the shop owner to get him to hack into this laptop...
Peter Kropotkin wrote:as for the Biden attorney vouching for the computer, never happened.....
no attorney of any values would admit something like this even if it were true...
and it isn't..........
Peter Kropotkin wrote:now does this story sound in any, way, shape or form to be even vaguely possible?
Peter Kropotkin wrote:If I were to hold to your story, I would certainly change it to make
fit reality.. and nice effort in changing the facts.. I too would change it
enough to fit into some reasonable time line...
Peter Kropotkin wrote:and referencing the NYPOST, the least reputable media outlet in NY,
yah, that is a nice touch....
Peter Kropotkin wrote:and I like the way it suddenly, just less then a month before the election,
it suddenly comes out... yeah, that certainly would fit the facts that by your account,
the laptop has been around since 2019....excellent use of a failed
conspiracy theory....
Peter Kropotkin wrote:I don't watch video's but are you referring to the all ready
discredited laptop left in New jersey?
and if you are, you are one mighty gullible fool...
Urwrongx1000 wrote: before the election.
Urwrongx1000 wrote:I'm guessing that Giuliani and Bannon will threaten to release 'everything' against specific MSM outlets if they continue to spike and censor the rising awareness within a week.
Just my guess though, it's exciting regardless!
iambiguous wrote:'The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal have reported that they could not independently verify the data in the Post article, which included hedging language, referring at one point to an email “allegedly sent” to Hunter Biden.
'“The story was vetted and The Post stands by its reporting,” a Post spokeswoman said in a statement.'
Let's see what actual facts can be established.
obsrvr524 wrote:So you think that they can't figure it out but You can?
Whereas posters like Urwrongx1000, obsrvr524 and Wendy Darling are construed by me to be declamatory right wing fanatics... objectivists who insist that if others don't think exactly like they do they must be liberal scumbags.
I call them Kids. Something I made up one day to encompass my reaction to what I construe to be minds that are not even remotely challenging. Often their "contributions" consist of little more than youtube videos, vicious sub-mental vituperation, and absurd conspiratorial tracts from the likes of QAnon types.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users