It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Discussion of the recent unfolding of history.

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby obsrvr524 » Tue Jan 12, 2021 5:33 pm

promethean75 wrote:we demand that urwrongx1000 submit his formal resignation from this thread immediately.

if he does not, carleas, myself and the house of moderators will move to impeach him.

If this happens, urwrongx1000 will not be eligible to post in this thread ever again.

We will also petition all other platforms to ban urwrongx1000 along with any and all associations.
:evilfun:


Although just joking now, that really has happened to many people on internet forums. :(
Member of The Coalition of Truth - member #1

              You have been observed.
    Though often tempted to encourage a dog to distinguish color I refuse to argue with him about it
obsrvr524
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:03 am

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Jan 13, 2021 3:37 am

can we wait? im digging watching him melt down slowly as trump gets deeper and deeper into his downfall. dont u guys wanna see him spaz for the next week or so?
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Meno_ » Wed Jan 13, 2021 6:57 am

Mr Reasonable wrote:can we wait? im digging watching him melt down slowly as trump gets deeper and deeper into his downfall. dont u guys wanna see him spaz for the next week or so?





It appears that way doesen't it, but by now the apprehension of this thing gets ominously darker day by day.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 8091
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Jan 13, 2021 7:06 am

acting ag made a youtube video tonight just after youtube banned trump

sounds like the next batch of idiots who try and riot to overthrow the constitution will be met with significantly greater obstacles from law enforcement.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:13 am

u like 2 fantasize a lot dont u?
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Jan 13, 2021 9:55 pm

nah i stick to reality. like the reality that there are 1000s of national guard troops sleeping in the capitol now just waiting to gas the fuck out of the next batch of traitors who show up and try and overthrow the constitution and subvert american democracy.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Wed Jan 13, 2021 10:48 pm

if that were true they would have arrested congress for allowing this cheat and defraud of the american people
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:07 pm

only a small batch of brainwashed weirdos believe that blatant propaganda. most of the however many million people who voted for trump don't. your movement isnt as big as you think it is. trumpism is about to get a good smacking from the people of america
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby d0rkyd00d » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:46 pm

Bets on whether UrWrong has actually read the constitution?

Anyone?

Bueller?
"So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men." -Voltaire

"If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do."
-Bertrand Russell
d0rkyd00d
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:37 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Thu Jan 14, 2021 4:47 pm

i am certain that he has not. he doesnt even understand the 1st amendment
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:09 pm

it doesnt take a genius to know banning the president's speech from any public or "private" platform is a flagrant violation of the us constitution

but u 2 clowns defend a defrauded election, so u have no integrity or honesty whatsoever
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Sculptor » Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:20 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:it doesnt take a genius to know banning the president's speech from any public or "private" platform is a flagrant violation of the us constitution

but u 2 clowns defend a defrauded election, so u have no integrity or honesty whatsoever

Utter bollocks

Facebook and Twitter are privately owned companies and have no obligation to provide a platform for ANYONE.
There are at perfect liberty to refuse to service to whomsoever they choose.

You are obsessed with talking nonsense.
Sculptor
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:52 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Sculptor » Thu Jan 14, 2021 5:23 pm

First Amendment.
"Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press".

Facebook and Twitter are not "congress" last time I looked.
I know Trump thinks Twttering like a loon was his main avenue of political discourse, but Congress it AINT.
Sculptor
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:52 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 8:23 pm

Private institutions are not bound by the US Constitution? Actually, they are too.
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby obsrvr524 » Thu Jan 14, 2021 11:18 pm

Actually it's a violation of Title V of the Telecommunication Act -
    No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
Twitter and Facbook have been censoring, editing, and contextualizing political and legislative speech - manipulating elections. That makes them not merely a provider of a communication service but a publisher, editor, and content provider.

Section 230 provides them protection as merely a communications provider but not as a content editor. So they are liable for that second role and could have been properly sued years ago.

The issue is simply that Twitter has acted as both. But they are being legally treated as if they were only the communication provider and nothing else. So they are actually NOT protected from their editing by the law any more than they would be protected from theft or murder. These are two separate legal issues being conflated into one merely because both involve communication content. Protection from one does NOT provide legal protection from the other.

But Americans have been proven to be so corrupted and/or naive (or at times just plain stupid - in Eric Swalwell's case all 3) that in the long run it doesn't matter. The globalist preferred position is the "right" position regardless of anyone's laws.
Member of The Coalition of Truth - member #1

              You have been observed.
    Though often tempted to encourage a dog to distinguish color I refuse to argue with him about it
obsrvr524
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1860
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2019 9:03 am

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Fri Jan 15, 2021 4:31 am

Urwrongx1000 wrote:it doesnt take a genius to know banning the president's speech from any public or "private" platform is a flagrant violation of the us constitution

but u 2 clowns defend a defrauded election, so u have no integrity or honesty whatsoever


dude for a guy who loves the first amendment so much you sure as fuck have no idea at all how it works.

you are aware that it isn't your interpretation of it that is law right? and that it isn't far right pundits who get to decide what it means...right? the constitution lays all that out for anyone to see.

what the fuck are you doing on a philosophy board? seriously. if you dont understand the simple reality of what the 1st amendment says, means, and does and how it applies, then you have no business here pretending like you have even a shred of intellectualism about you.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Fri Jan 15, 2021 4:33 am

obsrvr524 wrote:Actually it's a violation of Title V of the Telecommunication Act -
    No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.
Twitter and Facbook have been censoring, editing, and contextualizing political and legislative speech - manipulating elections. That makes them not merely a provider of a communication service but a publisher, editor, and content provider.

Section 230 provides them protection as merely a communications provider but not as a content editor. So they are liable for that second role and could have been properly sued years ago.

The issue is simply that Twitter has acted as both. But they are being legally treated as if they were only the communication provider and nothing else. So they are actually NOT protected from their editing by the law any more than they would be protected from theft or murder. These are two separate legal issues being conflated into one merely because both involve communication content. Protection from one does NOT provide legal protection from the other.

But Americans have been proven to be so corrupted and/or naive (or at times just plain stupid - in Eric Swalwell's case all 3) that in the long run it doesn't matter. The globalist preferred position is the "right" position regardless of anyone's laws.



are you advocating for govt control of private companies? you a socialist?
Last edited by Mr Reasonable on Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:43 am

Mr Reasonable wrote:dude for a guy who loves the first amendment so much you sure as fuck have no idea at all how it works.

you are aware that it isn't your interpretation of it that is law right? and that it isn't far right pundits who get to decide what it means...right? the constitution lays all that out for anyone to see.

what the fuck are you doing on a philosophy board? seriously. if you dont understand the simple reality of what the 1st amendment says, means, and does and how it applies, then you have no business here pretending like you have even a shred of intellectualism about you.

lol look at u trying to lecture me about the first amendment

u dont no shit smears, the freedom of speech began in 700a.d. when medieval europeans learned to read and write without the catholic church's permission

ur an idiot
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Fri Jan 15, 2021 6:10 pm

the 1st amendment did not exist in 700 a.d. you big dummy
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby promethean75 » Fri Jan 15, 2021 7:36 pm

I just read they had it in 400 b.c., so obviously British Columbia has had it for decades at least.
promethean75
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4049
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Mr Reasonable » Fri Jan 15, 2021 7:50 pm

was that on bitchute?
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.


Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 28461
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby d0rkyd00d » Fri Jan 15, 2021 9:07 pm

Mr Reasonable wrote:was that on bitchute?


Bruh it's been on Bitchute since 700 A.D.
"So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men." -Voltaire

"If an opinion contrary to your own makes you angry, that is a sign that you are subconsciously aware of having no good reason for thinking as you do."
-Bertrand Russell
d0rkyd00d
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2987
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:37 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Fri Jan 15, 2021 11:40 pm

wannabe "philosophers" celebrating the death of free speech and first amendment, ever consider that you clowns arent philosophical at all, and u never once said anything interesting or important on this forum?

at least prom has significance in his inane yet consistent defense of stalin's soviet union, other than that, what else?
Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Sat Jan 16, 2021 3:55 am

Urwrongx1000
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4415
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNJUST

Postby Silhouette » Sat Jan 16, 2021 4:21 am

Lol just read the last page of posts - fuckin' hilarious.
I'm pretty sure the more you engage him, the more he will dig in his heels: there is but one single-minded goal at work here, which is to claim-claim-claim that what he already thought was always 100% correct and deviations are, you guessed it, wrongx1000. Obviously literal stupidity in its purest form, but like a dog you give it as little engagement as possible when it poops in your home because it will mistake any stimulation as reinforcing positivity.

A silver lining is that it may unite everyone else in agreement that what he says is so obviously and consistently and utterly backwards - like a kind of compass that tells you exactly where to head away from intellectually. This is how I take anything he says - as a reliable indicator of exactly the opposite of what is true. It's uncanny how reliable this measure is if you give it a try.
User avatar
Silhouette
Philosopher
 
Posts: 4552
Joined: Tue May 20, 2003 1:27 am
Location: Existence

PreviousNext

Return to Current Events



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users