by Meno_ » Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:54 am
Degrees of individual intelligence evolved from very basic social programs that react to natural instinct.
The idea that humanity has repressed. A basic instinct of the group Mon D. Is fairly evident, the so whole idea of.civilisation is partly a cover to favor the individual.
And at this stage of history, that is wjat is at stake, as repressed social forms are being integrated within the expressed ideas of western ideas, rather then letting perennial cultural forms evolve.
It appears that we are.running out of time, simulated intelligence, artificial city, does not afford an individual reference to knowledge in the axaptovr fashion, increasing short cuts of programs have to be shortened, simplified.
A kid today as young as 5, has an intelligence machine in his hand, that in the early days ofnUNIVAC, HONEYWELL, and IBM, took A huge room to occupy.
Simplification is a necessity to learning, at the very least, as kids learn to derive quadratic equation once, they are not expected to sequentially run through the proof again and again.
It is the memory it's self that is destrutured, to accomodate knowlesgr acquisition at ever faster levels of multiple of hyper levels.
The original hypothesis may at some point will cede as a reference point.
The programs depending on objects, at some point disintegrate such objectivity.
The difference between object and objectivity has been intuitef, by sense and sensibility.
This is what the end of history entails, the dissasociation of memory.
That is why psychoanalysis has lost its premise, that of recapturing symbolic reference.
These formal structural arrangements become the philosophy multitudes of bubbles, and foams. The.hyperreactive tie ins of symbolic hierarchies can no longer be structurally supported.
The real architecture of the structural basis of knowledge has to adopt the simulative.
Affectivity replaces effectivity as the form of cogniscensibility over cogniscience.
Science will reach the point of the great bubble in a generation or so.
Then what? The primitive/behaviorist will conflate with the complex theorist.
History will short any.measurable difference.
Overload? It will ground it's self in any case.