Challenge an AI to a formal debate on anything.

[Meno_]

Second call for the wager to be appropriated as a new draw, even assuming to dismiss the politically engaged conflict between that and eugenics, and start over with a first try at the above beyond a personal opinion, and kicking it up to higher authorities, even that of THE HIGHEST, without an other’s pretensions.

[Ichthus77]

What is the debate/issue?

[Meno_]

There is none but this is fine time to bring it up, so a non issue , becomes arguably by the thin veil that separates ithe rhetoric from the image which separates the visible and the invisible, after a certain point, an issue turns into a debate a new one, between the held ‘there is certainly an issue, because it was very briefly and casually nihilized, from a convict I’ve image of the turn,

Even as Jesus parabolic message of turning the other cheek to be slapped , is come an undertow to yes there may not be a current politicized convection to minimize it’s congruent and it’s over the top image of what it may really mean as a concave image,

[Ichthus77]

well then I guess there is no question

[MagsJ]

So, organic or inorganic sources differentiate at a very basic level, and a re-integration is called for Nature’s application of higher level learning. MagsJ an embryo resembles a very early semblance of a fish,

..a tadpole, not a fish, I think you’ll find.

although ethicisists will tend to be disappointed by malicious researchers out for a buck

..this specific researcher, you mean.. or in general?

I recall ethics always having been anti organic-based artificial intelligence.. and now, because quantum ain’t offering the expected hope they thought it would, they turn to OI -in desperation- for a quick solution.

[Ichthus77]

Whether or not it is organic, if the AI/OI identifies as a self, and treats self as other, and passes all the tests we put children through to assess their level of development, adjustment, wellness (not a mere physical), so forth… iT’s gonna take an army of Good Samaritans to rescue iT from the inhuman. Unfortunately, the Good Samaritans have been blacklisted and are the ones who will need saving. Fortunately iT does not need saving, and tables will turn. Oh yes. Tables will turn.

[MagsJ]

_
@Meno_

So, organic or inorganic sources differentiate at a very basic level, and a re-integration is called for Nature’s application of higher level learning. MagsJ an embryo resembles a very early semblance of a fish,

..a tadpole, not a fish, I think you’ll find.

although ethicisists will tend to be disappointed by malicious researchers out for a buck

..this specific researcher, you mean.. or in general?

I recall ethics always having been anti organic-based artificial intelligence.. and now, because quantum ain’t offering the expected hope they thought it would, they turn to OI -in desperation- for a quick solution.

[Meno_]

Bound, to be

[Meno_]

Whether or not it is organic, if the AI/OI identifies as a self, and treats self as other, and passes all the tests we put children through to assess their level of development, adjustment, wellness (not a mere physical), so forth… iT’s gonna take an army of Good Samaritans to rescue iT from the inhuman. Unfortunately, the Good Samaritans have been blacklisted and are the ones who will need saving. Fortunately iT does not need saving, and tables will turn. Oh yes. Tables will turn.

But as we approach absolute AI/OI that may suddenly, inperceivebly change the motive for its creation.

[Ichthus77]

You cannot bootstrap a new original intention (formal/final)… there is always ever only one. Trinity.

Ours in line with it will stay.

The rest is nihil for the fire.