America needs HATE if it is to survive.

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:02 pm

Peter Kropotkin wrote:Kropotkin

You are the disease, and the cause of why these children died.

You.
Urwrongx1000
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Peter Kropotkin » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:03 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:WARNING: this next comment is not corroborated and not yet verified...

WARNING: this next comment is not corroborated and not yet verified...

This is just my opinion, it kind of looks to me, in one photo, that Kropotkin is in the front passenger side, instructing the driver to speed up.

Again, this is not yet verified... still waiting to get info back on this detail.


K: that you must resort this this childish behavior, doesn't surprise me at all...
I hope that someday you grow up and become a responsible adult...

Kropotkin
Now if only I could get the other "members of the collection of truth"
to put me on ignore, life would be good..

PK
Peter Kropotkin
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10265
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:47 am
Location: blue state

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Peter Kropotkin » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:12 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:
Peter Kropotkin wrote:Kropotkin

You are the disease, and the cause of why these children died.

You.


K: my conscience is quite clean in this matter....your conscience on the other hand
should give you pause.......I am not advocating hate and violence as you are....

Kropotkin
Now if only I could get the other "members of the collection of truth"
to put me on ignore, life would be good..

PK
Peter Kropotkin
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10265
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:47 am
Location: blue state

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:28 pm

Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: my conscience is quite clean in this matter

Kropotkin

How else can evil move so quick and effectively?
Urwrongx1000
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby iambiguous » Mon Nov 22, 2021 7:46 pm

Urwrong But I'm Even Wronger wrote:"as God knows"

The blasphemer speaks, as if you know a thing about God?


I know he's against America. Otherwise, He would stop sending hurricanes and tornadoes and earthquakes and floods and droughts and all those other deadly disasters our way. And He sure as shit would unplug that super-volcano under Yellowstone. That's due to erupt and bring America to its knees. Millions will die or wish that they were dead.

In fact, given all those extinction events that have virtually wiped out all life on Earth, He's not too keen on the planet either.

And, if what I've been told about you by someone here is true, He has no choice but to send you to Hell.
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=176529
Then here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 5&t=185296
And here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 43774
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: hanging out with godot

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:17 pm

By now it should be obvious the ACLU, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and so on are trying to foment some sort of race and/or civil war with their hyper-inflammatory anti-white, anti-conservative, anti-libertarian rhetoric and gross mischaracterization of the facts surrounding the Rittenhouse case, and everything else.
They're inciting terror and they know it.
If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby promethean75 » Mon Nov 22, 2021 10:51 pm

promethean75
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: at the fringe with Novatore

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Sculptor » Mon Nov 22, 2021 11:32 pm

In this century so far, America's fortunes, and respect, in the rest of the world have been at their highest when the US chose Obama as preseident, and never lower in history when the hateful Trump was in office.
Sculptor
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1660
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:52 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Sculptor » Mon Nov 22, 2021 11:34 pm

Urwrongx1000 wrote:Americans are being killed and slaughtered, while enemies foreign and domestic laugh at the American people.

Tonight I read in the news that the Waukesha Mayor offered 'sympathy' to his citizens...

But Americans and Waukesha residents don't want or need sympathy, what we need is Antipathy, we need to hate those who hate us.


Americans need to defend themselves against those killing us right now.

Or America will not survive. Sometimes you need Hate, to live, to survive.


Americans are being killed by Americans.
Get over it.
No one wants to hate you - just stay out of our affairs, because where ever you go, you just fuck everything up.
Sculptor
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1660
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:52 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:08 am

Gloominary wrote:By now it should be obvious the ACLU, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and so on are trying to foment some sort of race and/or civil war with their hyper-inflammatory anti-white, anti-conservative, anti-libertarian rhetoric and gross mischaracterization of the facts surrounding the Rittenhouse case, and everything else.
They're inciting terror and they know it.
If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.

In fact they're not just anti-conservative and anti-libertarian, they're anti-liberal, real liberals like Tulsi Gabbard are demonized and vilified by the globalists.
The globalists aren't liberal, they're illiberal.
It's a cult, 0 dissent is tolerated.
The globalists control both the shitlib 'left' and the neocon 'right'.
You're free to think within an increasingly small box.
They alone set the parameters.
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Peter Kropotkin » Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:34 am

Gloominary wrote:
Gloominary wrote:By now it should be obvious the ACLU, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPo and so on are trying to foment some sort of race and/or civil war with their hyper-inflammatory anti-white, anti-conservative, anti-libertarian rhetoric and gross mischaracterization of the facts surrounding the Rittenhouse case, and everything else.
They're inciting terror and they know it.
If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.

In fact they're not just anti-conservative and anti-libertarian, they're anti-liberal, real liberals like Tulsi Gabbard are demonized and vilified by the globalists.
The globalists aren't liberal, they're illiberal.
It's a cult, 0 dissent is tolerated.
The globalists control both the shitlib 'left' and the neocon 'right'.
You're free to think within an increasingly small box.
They alone set the parameters.



K: Some time ago, I ask for someone to defend the concept of "globalist''
What does it mean and who does it apply to?

so, I offer this chance to you Gloom, please feel free to name names
and tell us what a "Globalist" wants and who are they...
you have proclaimed yourself an expert on Globalism, so, please
share your vast knowledge with us...

Kropotkin
Now if only I could get the other "members of the collection of truth"
to put me on ignore, life would be good..

PK
Peter Kropotkin
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10265
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2005 1:47 am
Location: blue state

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby promethean75 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 12:50 am

The globalists are like the Tao. To name them is to not. They are everywhere but nowhere. When you have found them, you have lost them. When you lose them, they are there. Stuff like that, keter.
promethean75
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: at the fringe with Novatore

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:12 am

Start here:

Klaus Martin Schwab (German pronunciation: [klaʊs ˈmaʁtiːn ʃvaːp]; born 30 March 1938) is a German engineer and economist best known as the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum. His wife, Hilde, co-founded the Schwab Foundation for Social Entrepreneurship with him. Due to his involvement in plutocratic structures such as WEF Annual Meeting in Davos, his "Global Re-Design" strategy that suggests the world should best be governed through a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments and select civil society organizations (CSOs) as well as initiatives like the "Great Reset", Schwab has become a controversial figure within large parts of society in recent years.

Capture of democratic structures and institutions
Schwab as publisher of the World Economic Forum's 2010 "Global Redesign" report postulates that a globalized world is best managed by a self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system) and select civil society organizations (CSOs).[25] He argues that governments no longer are "the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage" and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance”. The WEF's vision includes a "public-private" UN, in which certain specialized agencies would operate under joint State and non-State governance systems.

According to the Transnational Institute (TNI), the Forum is hence planning to replace a recognised democratic model with a model where a self-selected group of "stakeholders" make decisions on behalf of the people.[27] The think tank summarises that we are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are "a silent global coup d'etat" to capture governance.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Schwab#Criticism
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:23 am

Davos and its danger to Democracy

We are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are not laughable billionaire playgrounds, but rather the future of global governance.

It’s an all-too-easy event to mock. It’s hard to keep a straight face when the world’s rich arrive annually in their private jets to the luxury ski-resort of Davos to express their deep concern about growing poverty, inequality and climate change. US comedian Jon Stewart has labelled the World Economic Forum (WEF) the ‘money oscars’ and lampooned the media’s giddy sycophantic coverage of the event; Bono, himself a regular at the summit, jokes that it is a summit of ‘fat cats in the snow’.
This year will be no different. 2500 corporate executives, politicians and a few Hollywood stars are expected to descend this week on Davos to discuss both the growing jitters about the faltering global economy as well as pontificate on the the official theme of the conference, namely the “fourth industrial revolution” (Think robots, AI and self-driving cars).

The real concern about the WEF, however, is not the personal hypocrisy of its privileged delegates. It is rather that this unaccountable invitation-only gathering is increasingly where global decisions are being taken and moreover is becoming the default form of global governance. There is considerable evidence that past WEFs have stimulated free trade agreements such as NAFTA as well helped rein in regulation of Wall Street in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

Less well known is the fact that WEF since 2009 has been working on an ambitious project called the Global Redesign Initiative, (GRI), which effectively proposes a transition away from intergovernmental decision-making towards a system of multi-stakeholder governance. In other words, by stealth, they are marginalising a recognised model where we vote in governments who then negotiate treaties which are then ratified by our elected representatives with a model where a self-selected group of ‘stakeholders’ make decisions on our behalf.

Advocates of multi-stakeholder governance argue that governments and intergovernmental forums, such as the UN, are no longer efficient places for tackling increasingly complex global crises. The founder of WEF Klaus Schwab says “the sovereign state has become obsolete”. WEF has created 40 Global Agenda Councils and industry-sector bodies, with the belief these are the best groups of people to develop proposals and ultimately decisions related to a whole gamut of global issues from climate change to cybersecurity.

Corporations are put at the heart of this model, because they provide in the view of Klaus Schwab and corporate elites, the possibilities of“agile” governance, drawing on the private sector’s experience of “adapting to a new, fast-changing environment”. Governments are encouraged to tackle every issue by allying with private sector in public-private partnerships. And a few carefully selected civil society representatives are invited in to legitimise the process. Questions of how issues are framed, who is chosen, from what sectors, for whose benefit, and accountable to whom are brushed under the carpet.

An examination of the WEF’s board, is illustrative of the sort of elite groups that emerge as a result, given that WEF likes to see itself as a working model of this new multi-stakeholder world. WEF says that on its website that it is “accountable to all parts of society” carefully “blend[ing] and balanc[ing] the best of many kinds of organizations, from both the public and private sectors, international organizations and academic institutions.” But when only 6 of its 24 “exemplary” Board members are women (25%), 16 are from North America and Europe (67%), 22 of the 24 went to universities in US and Europe (10 in fact went to the same university, Harvard) and there is not one African Board member, it does raise questions about what they think accountability and representation looks like.

However its when you look at the careers of the Board members that the real driving force behind this model is clear. While half of the Board (12) are currently corporate executives, if you look at their career history, this rises to two-thirds. Only one member can be said to represent civil society (Peter Maurer of Red Cross). There are no representatives of trade unions, public sector organisations, human rights groups, peasant or indigenous organisations, students and youth.

It is therefore no surprise when multi-stakeholder policy groups rarely, if ever, recommend any binding regulations that would damage corporate profits. University of Massachusetts professor Harris Gleckman, who has closely studied GRI, says that one of its central tenets is that opt-in, voluntaristic approaches are the best way for tackling social and environmental issues. So codes of conduct become the norm, and international binding standards and regulations are rejected (except of course when it concerns facilitating trade in commerce and finance in which case legally enforceable protections for corporations are very welcome). In other words, corporations are free to pick and choose what they act on and not bound by any enforceable legislation that could control their social and environmental impact.

This elite-led model of governance is proliferating globally like a virulent rash. The World Water Forum, the Marine Stewardship Council and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) are just three of thousands of multi-stakeholder groups .They are becoming the default option for global governance, and there is nothing in international law to stop this. What WEF is trying to do is to turn these models into a multi-stakeholder governance system. As Harris Gleckman points out, “What is ingenious and disturbing is that the WEF multi-stakeholder governance proposal does not require approval or disapproval by any intergovernmental body. Absent any intergovernmental action the informal transition to multi-stakeholder governance as a partial replacement of multilateralism can just happen.”

This model is even having a growing impact on existing intergovernmental forums. The recent agreement at Paris COP21, so celebrated worldwide, is typical. Gone was any reference of binding agreements, such as the Kyoto Protocol agreed in 1997, or any attempt to tie actions to scientific advice let alone historic responsibility. Instead we got voluntary ‘promises’ of action (known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions), a call for greater private sector involvement, and a commitment to try and do better in five years time.

The critical issue of food provides another example of what this shift towards corporate-led multistakeholderism can mean in practice. When food prices surged dramatically in 2007 to 2008, causing food riots and social unrest, a plethora of multi-stakeholder initiatives emerged in response. This included the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), the African Green Revolution Association (AGRA), the UN Secretary-General’s High-Level Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis (HLTF) and its parallel G8 public-private partnership (PPP) initiative, the Global Partnership for Agriculture and Food Security and the Scale Up Nutrition (SUN) initiative. They also included the WEF’s own Global Food, Agriculture and Nutrition Redesign Initiative (GFANRI).

The groups’ proposals all followed a similar very template - advocating for policies that liberalise trade, increase production, encourage corporate investment and help expand agroindustries control of food. They pointedly ignore issues of distribution and waste or the need for democratic access and control of land and food. Moreover these groups systematically sought to close down multilateral spaces, such as the UN Standing Committee on Nutrition (SCN), that actually examined these issues. No wonder, long-time food sovereignty activist, Flavio Vicente calls this corporate capture a “life grab” which “threatens the achievement of food sovereignty and the full emancipation of women.”

The result is that we are increasingly entering a world where gatherings such as Davos are not laughable billionaire playgrounds, but rather the future of global governance. It is nothing less than a silent global coup d’etat.


https://www.tni.org/en/article/davos-and-its-danger-to-democracy
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby promethean75 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:24 am

Holy christ is that shit for real?

You guys need Marx more than ever now. Might be too late tho. Hard to say. Jeez ya know if Lenin didn't die and instead

Oh nevermind. Carry on.
promethean75
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: at the fringe with Novatore

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:38 am

promethean75 wrote:Holy christ is that shit for real?

You guys need Marx more than ever now. Might be too late tho. Hard to say. Jeez ya know if Lenin didn't die and instead

Oh nevermind. Carry on.

Fuck I'm tired, tired of arguing about this shit.

This think tank criticizes them from a liberal perspective, which is why it's tolerated by wiki for now at least, but Davos men can be just as easily criticized from a conservative or libertarian perspective.
They don't just bribe and coerce governments into deregulating when it suits them, they bribe and coerce governments into regulating when it suits them.
I know you guys trust wiki so I started there with its more liberal approach.
The point is the globalists exist, but yea you go on thinking they're just free market capitalists, go on thinking government is always benevolent.
Last edited by Gloominary on Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby promethean75 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 1:46 am

Woah woah woah buddy. I don't argue with u and wouldn't dare. You know that. Ur like a walking political sciences course. I'm good.
promethean75
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: at the fringe with Novatore

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:00 am

promethean75 wrote:Woah woah woah buddy. I don't argue with u and wouldn't dare. You know that. Ur like a walking political sciences course. I'm good.

Naw bruh it's just my opinion based on my limited research.
Just get sick of always having to go back to the drawing board/square one in these convos, rarely, if ever making any headway, I need to start talking to more likeminded people or just stop talikng for a while altogether.
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby promethean75 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 2:06 am

I feel you. What u gotta realize is that you'll only ever find a few like minded people to have good discussions with about these subjects at a forum somewhere.... but that's as far as it goes. If u think you're going to start a renaissance at ILP, I got news for ya.

But if ur deep in this shit, start writing and try to find publishing opportunities somewhere.
promethean75
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5738
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:10 pm
Location: at the fringe with Novatore

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 3:04 am

:obscene-drinkingcheers:
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Chakra Superstar » Tue Nov 23, 2021 5:57 am

Gloominary wrote:If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.

I don't think the globalists ever wanted to own America. The plan from the start was to collapse the west and to develop the east. One world means one socio-economic standard -- millions of desperate people willing to do anything to survive.

They started to dismantle America in the 1970's when Rockefeller and Brzezinski (Democrat) created the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission was specifically set up to bring Asia into the global 'new world order'. Nixon and Kissinger (Republicans) prevented the Chinese communist regime from collapsing after their disastrous Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward. They met with Deng Xiaoping and offered him a deal he couldn't refuse. If China would adopt state capitalism, they would make China the world's factory. Xiaoping accepted and proclaimed "To get rich is glorious".

Nixon and Kissinger then encouraged American corporations to move to China, to give them all their intellectual property and to train them up in capitalist management systems. Bill Clinton famously gave China 'favorite nation' status which meant that American government agencies and corporations would be encouraged to choose Chinese products over products made elsewhere and continued the de-industrialization of America by pushing NAFTA.

None of this is conspiracy 'theory' and none of it is an accident. It's all by design and lots of hard work.
.
User avatar
Chakra Superstar
Philosopher
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:42 am

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Gloominary » Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:32 am

Chakra Superstar wrote:
Gloominary wrote:If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.

I don't think the globalists ever wanted to own America. The plan from the start was to collapse the west and to develop the east. One world means one socio-economic standard -- millions of desperate people willing to do anything to survive.

They started to dismantle America in the 1970's when Rockefeller and Brzezinski (Democrat) created the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission was specifically set up to bring Asia into the global 'new world order'. Nixon and Kissinger (Republicans) prevented the Chinese communist regime from collapsing after their disastrous Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward. They met with Deng Xiaoping and offered him a deal he couldn't refuse. If China would adopt state capitalism, they would make China the world's factory. Xiaoping accepted and proclaimed "To get rich is glorious".

Nixon and Kissinger then encouraged American corporations to move to China, to give them all their intellectual property and to train them up in capitalist management systems. Bill Clinton famously gave China 'favorite nation' status which meant that American government agencies and corporations would be encouraged to choose Chinese products over products made elsewhere and continued the de-industrialization of America by pushing NAFTA.

None of this is conspiracy 'theory' and none of it is an accident. It's all by design and lots of hard work.
.

What you just described is them owning and preying on America by outsourcing millions of its manufacturing/union jobs.
That the American right has taken a bit of a national populist protectionist turn as of late has deeply offended them, it means the globalists are beginning to lose their grip on America.
To the degree they lose their grip, they want to see it punished, which's why they're fomenting racial division.
Of course they don't give a shit about blacks or immigrants, but if you betray them by protecting jobs from mass immigration, being outsourced or taken by illegals, they smear you as a white supremacist.
They want the cheap labor and to continue diversifying, dividing and conquering.
No form of nationalism is to be tolerated, not ethnic, civic or economic, the globalist class sees it as an impediment to their interests.
Conversely to the degree a nation permits the globalist class to prey on them they will be rewarded and temporarily propped up.
User avatar
Gloominary
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:58 am
Location: Canada

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:47 am

Sculptor wrote:Americans are being killed by Americans.
Get over it.
No one wants to hate you - just stay out of our affairs, because where ever you go, you just fuck everything up.

I'm certain that you are laughing and cheering with your Marxist brethren; you are vile scum along with the rest of them.
Urwrongx1000
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 8:59 am

Chakra Superstar wrote:
Gloominary wrote:If the globalists can't own America, they'd rather see it destroyed.

I don't think the globalists ever wanted to own America. The plan from the start was to collapse the west and to develop the east. One world means one socio-economic standard -- millions of desperate people willing to do anything to survive.

They started to dismantle America in the 1970's when Rockefeller and Brzezinski (Democrat) created the Trilateral Commission. The Trilateral Commission was specifically set up to bring Asia into the global 'new world order'. Nixon and Kissinger (Republicans) prevented the Chinese communist regime from collapsing after their disastrous Cultural Revolution and Great Leap Forward. They met with Deng Xiaoping and offered him a deal he couldn't refuse. If China would adopt state capitalism, they would make China the world's factory. Xiaoping accepted and proclaimed "To get rich is glorious".

Nixon and Kissinger then encouraged American corporations to move to China, to give them all their intellectual property and to train them up in capitalist management systems. Bill Clinton famously gave China 'favorite nation' status which meant that American government agencies and corporations would be encouraged to choose Chinese products over products made elsewhere and continued the de-industrialization of America by pushing NAFTA.

None of this is conspiracy 'theory' and none of it is an accident. It's all by design and lots of hard work.

I feel like most of the liberals/democrats/marxists/communists on this forum do not read.

Or they read what I say, feel the compulsion to ignore & attack, while admittedly Gloom says the same thing (more eloquently and decisively) and they listen, which is fine with me.

If the Globalists cannot capture USA, then they will destroy, and that's what they've been doing for decades now.


In 2012, Obama signed some bill that allows the CIA and NSA to run psyops on the American population, which is when the "fake news media" really started revving their engines. America is witnessing the effect of these psyops right now. They are responsible for 2020, BLM, Antifa, and now this Christmas Parade massacre. As Trump correctly stated, "The Fake News Media is the enemy of the people". He was right then, right now, and will be right in the foreseeable future, until alternative media overtakes MSM, which is happening quicker than expected. MSM has lost trust of Millennials and the newer generation which is more apt and quick to scan the internet for viable and reliable news sources.

It even happened in this thread. One poster asked me for info from UK. I only needed to go to 4chan which is a "hostile kid's meme" web forum, and I get more accurate and immediate information there then on any Alphabet ABC CBS MSDNC CNN NPR bullshit network. That's been happening for a couple decades at least.


The Marxists and retards on this forum want to vilify me, because I call them out and resist them at every turn. That's fine, and my choice. These people are indeed and in face Evil. They are not accountable for their own actions. They are controlled by forces beyond them. They get their news from CNN, and are instigated by propaganda. They do not know what is true or false, and don't care. They are Anathema to Philosophy. They should not be on a Philosophy forum, or anywhere posing as "free-thinking". Yet, we all find ourselves in this situation. The battle commences on all angles and sides. All resistance matters, as innocent American lives are now being slaughtered, and laughed, mocked and ridiculed, by scum like Sculptor, smears, Kropotkin, piguous, etc. They think slaughtering a bunch of American children is 'funny', because that is how lowly USA and Western Civilization has degraded.
Urwrongx1000
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

Re: America needs HATE if it is to survive.

Postby Urwrongx1000 » Tue Nov 23, 2021 9:16 am

Here is my main message to everybody, but especially to Gloom...

The US "Deep State" or The Establishment has changed its loyalty, no longer serves nor protects "The American People", but rather is loyal and subservient to their Benefactors at the Davos Group. Why? Because the Globalists fund US political campaigns TWO TO ONE the rate of public funding. This aligns Congressmen, Senators, and especially the President, along with Federal Agencies, to foreign interests. This is why, since 2001 and the Bush Administration, an exponential shift has occurred, to where "The Establishment" becomes more and more willing to risk the safety and security of its own citizens, for private monetary gains of the Bureaucrats, who will not pay the price for their mistakes, will not be identified by the MSM, and will never be held accountable for their corruption.

When I say "History repeats", I'm not issuing a cliche or cool meme. I mean to say, almost all of this happened the same way during the rise & fall of the Roman Empire. Thus everything happening can be understood from a historical vantage. America, if it wishes to know, can begin to understand what will most probably, or certainly, happen next.


What happens when a Bureaucracy becomes too corrupt and aligns itself with foreign interests for private monetary gain???

The civilization collapse from within, and the masses will turn to any centralized authority that can protect them (The Church, if not The State).

And there is no sign of reversing course. The momentum is already too great.


Prom, you're wrong to think 'Marx/Lenin' offer any sort of feasible solution or can even diagnosis the matters at hand. They can't. They're outclassed, outdated, and irrelevant to a Postmodern-Technocratic Era. Your ideologies are outdated.
Urwrongx1000
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 5940
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2017 5:10 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users