Urwrongx1000 wrote:https://www.am1100theflag.com/news/national-news/26552-watch-mike-lindell-here-absolute-proof
Urwrongx1000 wrote:I've posted those in another thread yesterday. This Times release is a huge blunder, almost as bad as the False Flag Capitol riot.
Urwrongx1000 wrote:so mathematical impossibility is not proof? interesting
Mr Reasonable wrote:I'm saying that you are unable to recognize what is and isn't a mathematical impossibility.
obsrvr524 wrote:Mr Reasonable wrote:I'm saying that you are unable to recognize what is and isn't a mathematical impossibility.
A counting machine that says there were 123.1 votes cast for O'Biden is a mathematical impossibility - Yet it was found to have happened.
Peter Kropotkin wrote:obsrvr524 wrote:Mr Reasonable wrote:I'm saying that you are unable to recognize what is and isn't a mathematical impossibility.
A counting machine that says there were 123.1 votes cast for O'Biden is a mathematical impossibility - Yet it was found to have happened.
K: if there was proof, you would think the 60 plus court cases would have found that....
you guys lost 60 cases in court... and there was no evidence of any kind brought forward...
you evidence is so weak and flimsy, that a court won't look at it....
Kropotkin
Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: if there was proof, you would think the 60 plus court cases would have found that....
obsrvr524 wrote:Peter Kropotkin wrote:K: if there was proof, you would think the 60 plus court cases would have found that....
That is what You would think. Some of us know better - but that requires clearer thinking.
Urwrongx1000 wrote:The fact that you two dummies don't know the basics, proves that you don't know anything about proof.
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users