My hypothesis is: race/ethnic group is distinctly tied to specific clusters of political affiliation.
Therefore, if you are East Asian, then you will be more 'Socialist-Communist-Egalitarian' due to the severe Homogeneity of the East Asiatic Race.
Race/Ethnic group is primary (Nature). Political affiliation, identity, and location is secondary (Nurture). Humans cannot be "taught out of" or "convinced" of opposing political or racial factions, if innate differences are too large. This hypothesis automatically explains the differing political, commercial, industrial, social, and religious motivations of individuals directly corresponding to their racial and ethnic group clusters. Mixing races and ethnic groups does not remove the progeny from the clusters, it only pushes groups severely "left" or "right" in terms of "social justice". Mixed-race people, for example, feel alienated and "not belonging" to one group or the other, resulting in political fracturing, which is apparent in the US currently.
I don't think Asians are egalitarian, in general they're servile and slavish.
Anarchism, ergatocracy, democracy, timocracy, republicanism and nationalism are all white ideas, blind obedience Asiatic.
It was the fact that whites were freemen, among other facts, that enabled them to conquer nonwhites.
We ought to have a balance of democracy (more security (and liberty) for the majority) and republicanism (liberty (and security) for all), instead we have more security and liberty for minorities, the overclass and women, we may as well have more suffrage for minorities, the overclass and women too.
Which brings me to another way of thinking about these things.
This one is 4 dimensional (X, Y, Z and Temporal).
X/Object Axis: Security or Liberty
And of course there's different sorts of Security or Liberty, ecological, economic, medical, social and so on.
And Security or Liberty aren't always opposed, sometimes they're compatible or complimentary.
XA: Intellectual Security or Liberty
XB: Social Security or Liberty
XC: Economic Security or Liberty
Y/Subject Axis: Egalitarianism/(Reverse) Supremacism
Oftentimes one group can gain Security and Liberty at the loss of another group's Security and Liberty.
Security and Liberty for all or Security and Liberty for some and Insecurity and Subjugation for others?
YA/Class: (Security, Liberty and Suffrage for) The Poor and/or the Rich
YB/Ethnicity, Nationality and Race: Minorities and/or the Majority
YC/Sex: Women and/or Men
Z/Spatial Axis: Centralism, Globalism & Internationalism/Decentralism, Localism & Nationalism
Temporal Axis: Progressivism/Regressivism & Traditionalism