Dutch Divorce Rate Skyrockets In Response To Alimony Reform

[Aegean]

Female is the sex - specialized reproductive role - which acts as an agency of nature, filtering out unfit genes and memes.
This is why they become a target for male resentment when the absence of Paternalism returns females to their original natural role.
Males filtered out of the gene pool feel unjustifiably wronged.
Women do not understand how their judgment words - its intuitive - and they can be trained to filter out using memetic criteria, despite their genetic inclinations, producing, ni them a sense of confusion - loss of identity.

Reproduction depends on pretences. Males pretending to be more than what they are, and females pretending to do so, as well, so as to attract more males, more suitors.
Sex is a game of pretences, and females have evolved the ability to detect them.

Sex is aggressive, since it involves a penetration which requires the inhibition of the females fight/flight mechanism.
Similarly, for sperm to survive until they reach the ovum, and for the embryo to not be rejected as a alien element, the female has evolved self-deceiving chemical mechanisms to trick her own autoimmune systems.
This is mirrored in how her mind is placated and calmed, to permit the approach and intrusive penetration of an other organism - the male. She self-deceives, internally and externally, so as to permit the reproductive process to proceed successfully.
Lust is a form of chemical intoxication; love is a sophistication of it permitting tolerance and bonding.
A biochemical mechanism to deal with already evolved survival mechanisms.

[Kriswest]

Where and how did you two gentlemen gain your “knowledge” of women?

[Aegean]

On da streets, baby. In the hood.

But seriously.
all knowledge is gained in three ways.

1-First hand experiences.
2-Second hand experiences; watching others interact, from start to finish, seeing intentions, expectations and then consequences, results.
3-Third Hand experiences; rumours, gossip, knowledge shared from person to person.

Human behaviour can also be juxtaposed to animal behaviour, to gain insight into the primal, the instinctive; what underlies the pretences of civility and cultivation.

[Aegean]

Where, and how, do you get yours?
Do you interview the subjects and take their word on it?

I ask, if a dog can know itself more than a human can know it.
How many truly know themselves, or what your true motives are, beneath the ones you've convinced yourself about?
Do you?

[Kriswest]

I get mine similar but I look at the sources. The source must be considered the most important. I also must look at my opinion of the source so that there is no underlying bigotry so prejudice does not taint or twist data. The ultimate answer must come from all or as many types of personalities as possible.

[Aegean]

And how do you define "bigotry"?
Whatever disagrees with the popular zeitgeist?

[Kriswest]

Bigotry is prejudice against something it is not about just one view or attitude that dominates.
I am bigoted against okra, cauliflower, hate of background and ancestry and self made deliberate ignorance.

[Aegean]

What opinion is not bigoted? When does a perceived pattern cease to be prejudiced?

[promethean75]

all knowledge is gained in three ways.

1-First hand experiences.
2-Second hand experiences; watching others interact, from start to finish, seeing intentions, expectations and then consequences, results.
3-Third Hand experiences; rumours, gossip, knowledge shared from person to person.

this is a statement of your official epistemology? Well it's unacceptable and needs some considerable revision. Like I can't even know if I have analytical apriori necessary knowledge or synthetic a posteriori contingent knowledge if I rely on you, man.

For this reason I shall present to you the following video, that in its stead might you rise from your ashes like a phoenix, and see the world in its true epistemological glory.

[Kriswest]

What opinion is not bigoted? When does a perceived pattern cease to be prejudiced?

So many are not. Look at the word as part of a scale of emotions or taste. You can be prejudiced against something or someone but not hate, loathe or the extreme, want to kill.

[Aegean]

So, no opinion, whether positive or negative is bigoted if it has what?
Wanting to kill?

Who even mentioned anything about killing?

If I say chimpanzees are not as smart as humans, am I bigoted against chimpanzees; a chimpanzee-phobe, am I implying e should exterminate this species?
Could I not like cauliflower and still know a negative fact about it?
Could I not hate, dislike it, and still find a positive fact about it?

I think you are bigoted against anything that chalenges your world-view.

[Kriswest]

You obviously still just glance at what people write and pick and choose. I had hoped for better. I know you understand what I wrote if you take the time.

[Aegean]

What opinion is not bigoted? When does a perceived pattern cease to be prejudiced?

So many are not. Look at the word as part of a scale of emotions or taste. You can be prejudiced against something or someone but not hate, loathe or the extreme, want to kill.

What this?
That you imply hatred as a motive, makes you part of the popular method of dismissing reality that confronts your prejudices.

Taste is not a social construct, but it can be warped - shaped, directed, formed - with social engineering.
Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder, but coping with it, is subjective.
We recognize essence through appearance. Only the human manimal can be trained to be so ill that it doubts its own senses.

[Kriswest]

You are so wrong about the human animal being the only one. All species can be trained so.
You think we only use sight to know or perceive? We actually use all available senses. Some of us more than others but, if we have it, it is used even if we don’t know it.
We are herd/pack animals with limited genes and abilities. Inherited knowledge is given to the next generation. Instinct of food, drink and social bond.
Yes it does get warped and change through sentience and our direct indelible instinct to be part a herd. Like many animals we can change herds/packs and so change what is part of us. Adaptation.
Really not sure how you interpreted hatred as motive as you describe.
Hatred is a title for an innate instinctual attitude for all animals and to a point insects and perhaps certain plants. A protective, defensive sense. All that we title as emotions are instincts that direct towards safety. As sentient beings we should be able to redirect but,, our pack/herd instincts tend to kick in at times in error.
All are a scale though. Motive??? Perhaps instinct.