Gloominary wrote:My social, political and economic philosophy is basically a synthesis of the two.
I'm a national social democrat as opposed to an international social democrat.
On society, I'm in favor of some libertarianism, more conservatism and nationalism (the ingroup/majority first, insular) and no progressivism and globalism (outgroups/minorities first, outsular).
On government, I'm in favor of democracy.
On the economy, I'm in favor of some capitalism, more socialism and no corporatism.
I'm pretty live and let live, but insofar as government intervenes in our personal lives, it should be to help us make healthier choices, as opposed to say, helping an 8 year old cut his junk off.
I look at LGBT the way I look at alcohol and marijuana, like you should be free to do it, but it's nothing to be proud of, having a traditional family is, and keep it away from kids.
I think women should have as many rights as men, not more like they do now, but I also think most kids will be better off if the mother stays home while the father works, if financially feasible (and that's where reducing taxes and introducing supplementary income for the working class comes in, as well as increasing taxes and ending corporate welfare for the upper class, nationalizing the central banks and putting the banksters in jail).
I also think we should stop immigration from non-white countries, deport all illegals and refugees, and encourage some nonwhites to go back to their country of origin.
On science and medicine, I'm in favor of more alternative and DIY science and medicine.
I think science and government are hiding a lot of things about health and the nature of reality from us.
They want to keep us dumbed down, misinformed and sick, that way we're easier to manage and profit off of.
On technology, I think we've picked all the low hanging fruit sort of speak, what's left is either presently out of reach, unripe or poisonous.
I think tech should help preserve and protect what we are and evolve naturally, rather than transform us into something we're not.
It should enhance and supplement our lives, rather than substitute or replace them.
Tech exists to serve humanity, not the other way around.
We have to be more careful with how we proceed technologically, not try to fix what's not broken.
We got the wrong idea about tech.
That being said, I'm in favor of CO2 and global warming, the globe isn't warm enough, but as I've said elsewhere, I'm against 5G, geo and genetic engineering, nanotech and apprehensive about Ai.
CO2 is a nutrient, it's either a boon, not a concern or the least of them, but I am concerned about unnecessarily dumping toxic chemicals, the endangerment of species, unnecessary deforestation and scientific meddling.
Basically I'm a populist and for a healthier, more sustainable civilization.
I want to put the people, both as individuals and the white working class majority (our backbone) first, as opposed to the elite or minorities first.
I'm a populist because why the hell would I put others ahead of me and my people?
That's masochistic, servile and suicidal.
It doesn't mean I don't care about others, it just means I prioritize.
Let's spend most of our resources on us, and if we have a little something leftover, then perhaps we can help others.
There's no such thing as an antipopulist or unpopulist democracy, both elitism and pluralism are unpopular and undemocratic, populism and democracy are synonymous.
Our elite want to do the very opposite, promote the interests of themselves and minorities at the expense of ours as individuals and the white working class majority, as well as promote disease, death and conduct radical, reckless and unnecessary scientific experiments on a massive scale.
I've come to realize the elite aren't just selfish, they're anti-human and anti-life.
In all honesty, I'm not even sure they are entirely human.
I'm an agnostic and pretty secular, but insofar as government intervenes in our religious lives, it should be to promote white paganism.
Christianity at its core is Zionist, and I'm not a Zionist.
Israel and Jews have proven time and time, and time again they are not an ally.
Right, the alt right is diverse, perhaps more so than the alt left.
Donald Trump is in all likelihood a complete and total fraud, but I doubt every civic national libertarian politician and popular social media personality is a complete fraud.
I'm a white nationalist, but not every politician and social media personality who isn't a white nationalist is a total fraud.
I think of myself as a populist, rather than far, alt or center right or left.
Populism can be contrasted with pluralism (diversity, multiculturalism and multiracialism) on the one hand, and elitism on the other.
It's about emancipating, empowering and putting the interests of the majority first (which means the white working and middle classes), as opposed to minorities, or elites first.
For me, populism is something concrete.
Basically It's center-right on social issues, democratic and center-left on economic issues.
It's not far right or left, because both collectivism, and individualism are compatible with populism.
The people express their will with their dollar and freedom of choice, with their guns and at the ballot box.
If there's an excess of monetary and voter fraud, the people have the right to radically reform, or overthrow their government.
Insofar as government intervenes, it should be primarily to further the interests of the majority.
Rather than think of things in terms of right and left, I'd rather think of them in terms of inner and outer, or center/core and periphery.
Populism is the blood and guts of a society, elites and minorities are the extremities, or else, not a part of it at all, alien.
Elites and minorities become parasitical when they try to make themselves equal to the center, or put themselves at the center.
They must be made to recognize they are of lesser importance.
I have no desire to oppress anyone.
However, they should be accommodating us.
Populism is not scientific or religious elitism either.
Science and religion are of 2ndary importance.
What the people think, as individuals, communities and a collective, is primary.
Donald Trump is controlled opposition, people thought they had a choice between him and Clinton in 2016, in reality the choice between both was an elaborate illusion. They choose the presidential candidates putting them on television on all the major cable networks that they own and then they say, "Here's your political freedom and rights to vote in choosing.", in reality everything is already pre-determined before any individual sets foot on stage.
In reality both were Manchurian candidates making sure that no matter what happened or who had won they would have their person in the Whitehouse. Donald Trump has Rothschild connections all over the place but, we're led to believe he is a political maverick, independent, and champion of the people! What a fucking joke! 2016 was when the hidden international cabal had a real good laugh on the dumb American voting population. It was a real giant,"Fuck you, we own your asses no matter what", moment in American political history by the international hidden cabal, and the American population bought into it too!

Yeah, I'm all about political syncretism adding and mixing things from a variety of schools or thought into an effective working political organization. I like things from the right but there are some things on the left in terms of economics I like also concerning a political platform.
You know me, I'm against democracy. If you think modern democracies are shitty now just wait for being a new racial minority in a democracy as a white person. You'll have no political representation whatsoever since in democracy power is majority rule driven and you'll have all the other ethnicities or races of people running you down because you're a wicked white devil. [Think South Africa.]
This is why democracy is doomed to failure within multiracial or multiethnic societies.
In terms of economics we're in agreement although I think corporatism can be managed or regulated within a fascist state. The trick is to regulate corporations within every inch of their lives and make wealthy people very afraid that if they should ever harm the nation's general well being you send squads of secret police to hunt down their owners. The solution to the rich and wealthy is to put the fear of God back into them so to speak where death is hanging over their heads if they get out of line. The problem with the wealthy is that they're not afraid these days, I think we need to change that.

I don't like gays or homosexuals. For me they need to stay in the closet and never leave there. As long as they keep it private away from the public whatever. They've always been amongst us unfortunately.
I believe women should have limited-rights and while that sounds terrible or even shocking my perception on that is not completely horrible. Can discuss that a later time as I can talk about that literally for hours on end. Limited-rights are better than no rights at all just in case we have any gasping feminists within our audience here.
I'm all about a strong patriarchal male dominating culture where feminists and matriarchs along with their apologists can eat a bag of dicks for all I care.

We're in agreement on immigration but I don't think we whites have the numbers to strong arm them with especially when you divide our current numbers by half with all the retarded self hating white bleeding hearts neo-liberal jackasses. [White female mudsharks and their mud children included.]
Realistically much of the west is going to go Basque where white racial nationalists are going to pick a region and say that is ours belonging to us kicking everybody out fighting in the whole process. I guess what I'm saying, I don't think the future will be one where whites take back the entire United States in terms of territory. More realistically we'll take over three to six states where other races or ethnicities will take over others. This will become the new racial and ethnic balkanization in my mind when the United States collapses.
I like to think of them as the new miniature racial nation states that will develop with the disintegration of the United States. I can also easily see Mexico taking over California, Arizona, Texas, and other states in the process once a Mexican majority grows in all of those places. If a Mexican majority happens in those states, what's stopping the government of Mexico from just taking them over? Exactly, nothing at all.
I believe in universal education and healthcare being accessible to everybody but with education being limited to women based upon certain requirements that they must meet first upon entering. Once again, a subject for another day.
I'm all about invention, innovation, and science. So, I'm all for that. I am however a big critic of artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and the complete automation of everything. I have negative feelings or thoughts towards all three.
I'm a firm believer in industrialization, commerce, and economic prosperity. With that being said I'm also a devout environmentalist that believes in being good stewards of the earth and nature.
I'm fine with gun rights or civilian private gun owners but I believe they should be limited to pistols, shotguns, and rifles not military weapons. Depending on circumstances maybe even a military civilian defense force.
Global warming? I'm skeptical of the science behind that especially when there are some saying we're entering a new ice age. For me it's just natural cyclical weather patterns or fluctuations.
Do human beings have an impact on environment, wildlife, and natural bio-diversity? Absolutely, which is why again I believe in environmentally friendly regulations.
I don't hate other races and ethnicities of people either, I just prioritize my race first or foremost. I've lived in areas of the United States where whites are already a racial minority and it isn't fun let me tell you. It's not the cooperative racially collective social utopia like you see portrayed on television. I view racial and ethnic separation as being more peaceful than forcibly imposed integration. In fact I view racially forced and imposed integration as a major source of unwanted or unwarranted conflict. If whites are so bad like they say, then let them have their own territories, nations, and governments to live amongst themselves separately. Give American blacks Florida and Georgia to run as they please amongst themselves, I'm all for it. They could even have Louis Farakhan as their leader.
I'm not a supremacist either, I don't believe anybody is inferior or superior over another. All individual races and ethnicities have faults, deficiencies, or weaknesses of some kind, whites included. I just believe in white racial autonomy and independence which our enemies refer to as supremacy, which is just laughable.
As for religion a complete ban on Judaism and Islam with no exceptions. I don't like Christianity but at the same time I am at a conflict with a majority of white people being Christian. I'm forced to tolerate it even though I don't like it. It's definitely a zionist clap-trap but there are nationalist Christians out there to contend with. We're in agreement about promoting European paganism as an alternative religion giving Christianity a run for its money so to speak. Not sure about other religions, would have to be looked at on a case by case basis.
Also, under my system of government all Jews are forcibly expelled to Israel un-harmed effective immediately. Let the Palestinians, Egyptians, Lebanese, Jordanians, Syrians, Iraqis, Turks, and Iranians sort them out this time around. If they're truly God's chosen people he'll protect them in Israel once all foreign aid is immediately cut off to their nation.

Other things on my list would be to ban sexual interracial relationships bringing back laws that forbids it.
As for self hating whites or those with interracial children put them on a one way trip to Mogadishu, just kidding.


They'll be helped to move their belongings and other essential survival items they'll need to a new location, I'm not entirely heartless after all. Will even help them with money [Assuming any still has any worth or value in the future] to reintegrate themselves in their new environment, nation, or home repatriating. They just need to get the fuck out and rejoin their brothers or sisters of color elsewhere to which they can enjoy all the enrichment their little hearts desire.
Then there's that pesky conversation of who is white and who isn't or what if a person had a black grandfather eight generations ago if they're still considered white now conversation. I'm actually a little more flexible than most with that surprisingly but we can get into that later Gloominary as I think we're almost entirely on the same page with some minor differences.