Silhouette wrote:Why won't the market result in meat prices increasing by itself?
Can it only be selectively trusted to do what is best?
If not in respect of meat, why anything else?
His point was that Jakob is calling for regulation and this might not fit with his positions elsewhere. If regulation because the rainforest is so important - a position lefties, you know, those idiotic cowardly scum - are much more likely to hold, what other regulation of free markets might also be moral. What's the rule? If he holds that, why just with meat and just with considered to rainforests? Why not with other things that affect us or the well-being of the planet. Sillouette on this point has no onus. He is asking a really rather obvious question.Pedro I Rengel wrote:Silhouette wrote:Why won't the market result in meat prices increasing by itself?
Can it only be selectively trusted to do what is best?
If not in respect of meat, why anything else?
The only way to know would be to let the market try. I can tell you from my own experience, whenever I have encountered unregulated markets there has been an eery accuracy in prices juuust between what is profitable and what is worth paying.
But hey, you challenged Jakob the other day. I now challenge you: do some research into just how many regulations affect meat prices.
Pedro I Rengel wrote:By the way, the entire world is about to go broke.
central banks can basically never again stop the financial easing.
the moment something happens to the market, well, you can't ease when you are already in full easing mode.
resentful rednecks who need to be given healthcare for free though because...
I gotta be able to feel good about existing thanks to the back breaking of 90% of the planet
Oil is being hit super hard because all these oil giants are now having to invest in unproductive "green" (ehemredehem) energy projects.
Karpel Tunnel wrote:His point was that Jakob is calling for regulation and this might not fit with his positions elsewhere.
...
If he holds that, why just with meat and just with considered to rainforests? Why not with other things that affect us or the well-being of the planet. Sillouette on this point has no onus. He is asking a really rather obvious question.
Jakob wrote:All in see is socialists jumping to object to an idea about regulation. All I can see is liars and hypocrites with no trace of a heart.
Jakob wrote:I've given up on the godless scum here. I'm just here to express my views, which are always relevant. Because I do have a heart.
Serendipper wrote:Defend your position.
Pedro wrote:Holey Guacamole.
Pedro wrote:I need a drink...
Pedro wrote:Japanese central bank assets are currently around 300% of Japan's GDP. The ECB's assets are approaching 100% of Europe's.
The Fed is at a still staggering 20% or so.
I know you don't know what the fuck that means or implies, but the information is not necessarily meant for you.
I don't know what the fuck that means or implies, but it sounds scary.
Pedro I Rengel wrote:I know you don't know what the fuck that means or implies, but the information is not necessarily meant for you.
Pedro I Rengel wrote:That's what fixing a problem, instead of trying to make the state go broke by hiding stupid inefficient buro-vortexes behind ideas and self-righteousness (universal healthcare) looks like.
First you pull a bit at the knot, test the looser strings. Get a feel for how tangled it is.
Serendipper wrote:Pedro I Rengel wrote:That's what fixing a problem, instead of trying to make the state go broke by hiding stupid inefficient buro-vortexes behind ideas and self-righteousness (universal healthcare) looks like.
First you pull a bit at the knot, test the looser strings. Get a feel for how tangled it is.
Regurgitated can of alphabet soup.
I could always do Queen f3, but it's always nice to pack the knights in there as much as possible. Like wolves smelling blood, sensing a kill.
Anyway, I guess my point is just that, even though that pawn is really sexy there with the opposing black one, king all entrapped, Absolutely nothing is lost and everything is gained by opening that square. Only perhaps the illusion of more space.
Return to Society, Government, and Economics
Users browsing this forum: No registered users