Hurricane Sandy: Be Thankful

[Kriswest]

These communities down here pay attention not to media but extensive extended family relationships throughout the three coastal states / counties of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama. The local media has gone against parent company reports. If anyone is misinformed it is you. Your group has political agendas and are not above corruption. So come on tell me about the objective of Mississippi, the state that actually got hit and was beaten the hell out of. Was it government conspiracy that brought people together to help each other? Everyone out here in the country shared and helped, the govt people busted their butts to help. We had no power and no water for over two months. The military provided us with what we needed to survive. Dude you have no frigging clue of the truth thanks to politics. NewOrleans was not even devastated not even close. But according to politics it was the only victim. Shove your theories sideways because you arre nothing but a follower of manipulation.

[Mainstream]

Sure, sure.

We'll see what happens.

[Tralix]

I was not denying that the weather can be changed by chemicals or chemtrails, I was denying that they are for the reasons ultimately you give

I know. You're saying the government wouldn't use this (every single time) to control it's citizens, which is completely naive. It shows you have never once studied history, which means there is too much of a gap to continue.


So we're done.

You mean you don't really have any evidence they are doing this and it was detrimental deliberately to their own populations, you just make a sort of vague claim to governments doing things in the past which therefore mean they are doing them now, of which equally, you are unprepared to substantiate. I am supposed to take your concerns at face value with no actual evidence, and if I do not there is too much of a gap for us to talk about this subject. No offense but the gap is only between your supposition, lack of evidence and logic therein, and the conclusions you make.

[statiktech]

You mean insisting upon the truth of a claim isn't just as good as providing evidence? Well, what about calling people played out names and accusing those who ask questions of not knowing anything about history, science, or whatever? That works, right?

[Mainstream]

Don't be mad because I'm only here to talk to those with perception.

Develop some.

[Tralix]

Don't be mad because I'm only here to talk to those with perception.

Develop some.

You're only here to talk with people who agree with you, preaching to the converted is easy, but converting people to your beliefs is hard without firm logic or evidence. I'm perfectly willing to believe that governments do bad things, in fact heinous things, what I am doubtful of is only that they do such bad things based on your opinion.

[statiktech]

Don't be mad because I'm only here to talk to those with perception.

Develop some.

Holy fuck, no you didn't! Come at me bro.

[lizbethrose]

Thanks for the Greatest Generation film. It was a priceless bit of comic relief--a real hoot!

[brevel_monkey]

I think we can conclude that it involves the weather, and something called orgonite.

Someone with a passion for learning might google that; someone without might not.

Or, they might ask someone who knows about it, which is another valid way of finding information, right?

[captaincrunk]

I'm reporting this thread to be moved to the rant house, because if Gobbo (mainstream) won't provide any evidence or justification for his wild assertions it isn't philosophy.

[Stoic Guardian]

It's not in philosophy though...

[Mainstream]

I'm reporting this thread to be moved to the rant house, because if Gobbo (mainstream) won't provide any evidence or justification for his wild assertions it isn't philosophy.

Run to mommy

[PavlovianModel146]

It's not in philosophy though...

Got it in one. SS posts can contain nothing but unevidenced opinion, if such is the case, even though I am not saying that such is necessarily the case in this case.

Case closed.

[captaincrunk]

It's not in philosophy though...

look up. "Philosophy Forums" < Society, Government, and Economics

not "moaning madly about bullshit to rile people up over nothing"

[Stoic Guardian]

It' in philosophy forums but not the specific subcatagory of just philosophy.

Maybe it doesn't matter? I don't know...

[Tralix]

It' in philosophy forums but not the specific subcatagory of just philosophy.

Maybe it doesn't matter? I don't know...

Maybe there should be a sub category of the Rant house called "La,la,la la I'm not listening!"

[captaincrunk]

It' in philosophy forums but not the specific subcatagory of just philosophy.

Maybe it doesn't matter? I don't know...

mod says this thread is fine, so it's fine. doesn't make the thread any good though, or chemtrails any less BS.

[Mainstream]

As I said in this thread, weather control was perfected in the 70's, and that's why the major countries at the time signed the treaty saying they wouldn't use weather modification on each other (but internally was fine.) This was about 20 years after Reich demonstrably proved you would alter the weather using orgone. So the treaty was drafted after 20 years of testing, and that itself was over 40 years ago, and you're saying chemtrails and weather control is unproven? Not only it is a historical fact, but they have had 60 years of time to improve upon it.

This is just one of those topics that isn't on television, or when it is, it's on on the MSM for the purpose of confusing the public as to the legitimacy of it. They want it to be a secret as much as possible, but for anyone who has thought about this coherently for like 4 minutes or longer, you can see that it's really not a secret, and the evidence is pretty much everywhere.

As I had said, and even liked to a couple times, Holder just says, 'Yeah we're using chemtrails now on the US public." It's not a secret, it's just not going to be screamed at you through the MSM like most things are.

That is how dumb they (and I) think you are: something that is totally public, you refuse to accept just because the talking heads on television haven't said 'Ok, believe this now.' lol it's really quite funny and sad at the same time. If I was born into the elite circle and didn't come from pretty much the most regular consumerist family you could conceive of, I would be 100% on board with this plan. It's so easy to see why the elites hate the public and think they are so unbelievably stupid when they put out all this information and everyone just ignores it.

But I think humanity is worth saving. This isn't Gotham city.

The real question is whether I am even right about that. The more time goes on, the more I am just consistently disappointed and fail to really see any place for these people in the coming world order.

[captaincrunk]

As I said in this thread, weather control was perfected in the 70's,

We don't even have weather prediction "perfected" yet. Goddamn it Gobbo, wake up. We have the most powerful computers in the world just trying to predict weather patterns and we haven't perfected it. And here you are trying to say we control it. For fuck's sake.

The real question is whether I am even right about that. The more time goes on, the more I am just consistently disappointed and fail to really see any place for these people in the coming world order.

Please, give up and go live among the lizards or something.

[Mainstream]

We don't even have weather prediction "perfected" yet.

I just laid out in detail how you do, so if you cannot address any of my points, then you're just repeating yourself senselessly.

I have cited evidence. You have not.

[captaincrunk]

We don't even have weather prediction "perfected" yet.

I just laid out in detail how you do, so if you cannot address any of my points, then you're just repeating yourself senselessly.

I have cited evidence. You have not.

You haven't cited anything, dude. You've just insisted that such and such things are true. You aren't connecting anything, or even giving us sources that aren't you. You're just saying that Holder totally told us about chemtrails. Where? How does what he supposedly said show you to be correct in your assertions?

[Mainstream]

You haven't cited anything, dude.

I don't think you know what that word means.

Citing means referencing something. You are looking for me to link you a webpage, which is completely different.

How many times have you seen me link someone like you to 'evidence'? I rarely do it so I can sit back and watch people refuse to learn.

It proves my point. You don't even feel yourself worthy of the information. You have no no desire to learn on your own. So why would I take yous seriously? You're a joke.

[captaincrunk]

You haven't cited anything, dude.

I don't think you know what that word means.

Citing means referencing something. You are looking for me to link you a webpage, which is completely different.

How many times have you seen me link someone like you to 'evidence'? I rarely do it so I can sit back and watch people refuse to learn.

It proves my point. You don't even feel yourself worthy of the information. You have no no desire to learn on your own. So why would I take yous seriously? You're a joke.

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/citation

you're wrong.

[Mainstream]

No, I'm not. Which is funny.

If you think citation means internet link, then rest comfortable with the fact that you think you are correct.

I cited the treaties, the people, the timelines.

You have cited literally nothing. Everything in this thread is just your opinion and nothing more. You cannot say that about what I have stated. That is the difference. I have actually researched this before; you have never researched this before.

[captaincrunk]

No, I'm not. Which is funny.

If you think citation means internet link, then rest comfortable with the fact that you think you are correct.

I cited the treaties, the people, the timelines.

You have cited literally nothing. Everything in this thread is just your opinion and nothing more. You cannot say that about what I have stated. That is the difference. I have actually researched this before; you have never researched this before.

You didn't provide the treaties, the people, or the timelines. You just asserted the shit. That's all you fucking did. Now I know why you don't have a philosophy degree. If you tried this bullshit at even a community college you'd fail out.