iambiguous wrote:In conclusion...
Meno_ wrote:
I think Your analysis is correct in terms of the peripherally defined onto-logical observation suggests. However, from the point of view, of designated das-sein is concerned there appears the fragmentive conjectural problem surrounding the definitive, or definitional subset,
In a relational sense rather then the topicality of a fragmented self as inscribed rather then circumscribed
That implies a kind of self fragmented process that demands a sustained interpretation , involving the modus of relating such within it's own self valuing
I can only leave it to others to translate this into an argument that they feel addresses my points above.
At least make the attempt to explain why in your own opinion this is
not a self-conscious attempt on his part to expose the intellectual gibberish that does pass for "serious philosophy" among some here.
Sure, I'll be the first to admit it all revolves instead around my own
lack of sophistication in grasping the technical foundations of philosophy.
So, by all means, let's go there in regard to packing the Supreme Court.
Biggy,
The very sign of fragmentation on the very lowest peripheral understand in is to disassociate ' serious' and 'disconcerted or not serious " philosophy.
Why not just say, philosophy is pholosophy,apart but a part of. inquiry in general.
That would IN It's Self, be a venereal description of Das Sein
Then instead appearing to go along without a deconstructed state that individually reduces the symbolic structure into a collection , at tries to elevate said state into the intentionality which supports itself through increasing subtlety and through works in progress.
I m with You not against, for instance in demonstrating that tribalism and colonialism move in opposite ways, but they are similar in ways that appear to defy logic.
The problem with the seeming irreconcilability is inter Al to structural significance which can only be utilized but not denied.
.In a new world order situation , relying upon the onslought of rapid process made in communication and information technology, shortcuts are constantly generated to take up the slacks which bubble within the would be generated mass.
The mass is, of course the mass of people who gain understanding of the many information. gaps which have taken thousand year gaps, time passages that could digest a natural menu of fed political, , psychological and social regimen.
But that diet has been enriched by a reduced and shallower out method of information acquisition, which entail reductive methods of thining out symbolic-neural- linguistic levels of communication.
That was the gest of the argument presented in a significant new left work" 'The One Dimensional Man'
What happened to liberalism of today? You can comment on Your theais, without considering the connect between the substance of today's liberalism and the dynamism with which the New Left reacted to the expansion of political central conventional aythirity; essentiality with the moral imperives You inscribe. ..
out symbolic levels, the charge of definitional spoonfeeding may become a credible charge, as within the realms of nominal understanding, a child has to abide with facing the increasingly complex world.
On the level of tribalism, participation mystique plays a clear role in determening the sharing of power earned by the more priximally related factors that enter into related conceptual levels of understanding , and the quick fix general understanding that Western man's more individualistic orientation -initially presents a stark contrast to the more dispersing e understanding of what relevance consists of.
The consistency of Constitutional matters, matter distingualky to these divisive ways if interpretation without
a das ein,, toward a designed, intended socially integrated whole, that invariably and schematically takes on an affronting posture against the bubbly mass of topical , yet undeniably lacking social terrain.
The polemics of dictators fail that test, and that test failing presents a goulish spectacle of decolonizing verbatum, methodically in accord with the hope that such shallownes, as described above, can be overcomy by the mass dealization, that time remains ING does not accord the lead inv , except by this fragmented, rote imitative learning using optical facilitation to best advantage.
The Supreme Court packing which advances of disad Andes one vies over the other, the question arises, pits authority loved human rights.
Should people be awarded more or less moral latitude, of should they be squeezed back into oriod formative control models?
Do the even have power to overcome the economic hurdles beset today , over in the classic sense that Heidegger's tried to formulate after Kant left him/ then in the lurch?
An TAOISM, of the more cruel Zen,- according to some here, take up the slack?