phoneutria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC0faZiBcG0&t40m20s=
Note to others:
In 25 words or less what does this tell you about me?
Or, sure, her.

phoneutria wrote:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DC0faZiBcG0&t40m20s=
Meno_ wrote:Aegean wrote:If Mowk sees you guys using the 'a' word he'll red-flag you - report you to the5 authorities, tell teacher.
He's an officer of the infamous secret thought police, funding the bringing Nazis, fascist and other vile thought criminals to justice, and keeping this forum upon to the standards we all know and love.
How else has it attracted so many geniuses and gathered so many messiahs in one place?
Don't you guys know Peterson and the politburo of China and Russia read ILP and form their global strategies?
This place is a world renown brain storming source affecting humanity.
Ya, think an ancient soul would waste itself infinite time on us if this were not so?
Curb the language.
Say backside , or buttocks.
Ts ts ts.....naughty naughty .
Good double play , though rather ambiguous and dupliciously inverted, to make sense to everyday folks.
In a way it offers more slack , as in fishing before the bite.
phoneutria wrote:I messed up the time stamp on that vid. try this https://youtu.be/DC0faZiBcG0?t=2395
phoneutria wrote:you know, how you're not able to make common sense decisions that any average joe can easily make, simply by pointing at something and saying "that. i want that" ? that's what I mean
jordan b. peterson wrote: Nietzsche believed that once the religious systems collapsed we would have to consciously produce our new set of values, but Jung believed that the psyche was the source of all value, and so it was not a matter of creating new values, it was a matter of discovering the values that were already lying dormant and implicit within us.
And the next thing I would say about this, you all know this. You just don't know you know it. And so one of the reasons to be educated from a literary and historical perspective, is that you can come to understand what you already know. Because if you don't understand it, there's an element of your being, the element that knows it and acts it out, and there's another element which is sort of you as a personality, they're completely at odds with one another, and that makes you weak. It makes you something that is divided within itself
phoneutria wrote:Don't you know who you are?
iambiguous wrote:I don't believe there is a "real me"
Yes, this is one way of looking at the problem. There is an implicit assumption that the neutral state is statis. Not moving, not deciding unless something is clearly right, good, correct, needed and so on. Whereas life is in motion, doing. So, while he presents his situation, implicitly and to some degree explicitly as I don't know what I should do, demontrate the right path (such that all rational people...etc.).phoneutria wrote:[
You have a gaping hole between your personality and your psyche where the connection with your instinctual drive for decision and action is lost. Fix that.
Unpin yourself from that mat yo.
He's going to try to engage you in demonstrating he has an 'I' and what process all rational people should engage in to figure out what one's (authentic) 'I' is. Again, the presumption is that unless what is outside himTry wasting less time having the same fruitless conversations in a dark corner of the internet, rocking back and forward like a mad person, and more time trying to find out who you are. Once you know that, you will no longer be in conflict.
phoneutria wrote:I still remember what I asked you in May of 2015 in the "psychology of objectivism - one possible narrative" threadphoneutria wrote:Don't you know who you are?
To which you answered:iambiguous wrote:I don't believe there is a "real me"
Karpel Tunnel wrote:Yes, this is one way of looking at the problem. There is an implicit assumption that the neutral state is statis. Not moving, not deciding unless something is clearly right, good, correct, needed and so on. Whereas life is in motion, doing. So, while he presents his situation, implicitly and to some degree explicitly as I don't know what I should do, demontrate the right path (such that all rational people...etc.).phoneutria wrote:[
You have a gaping hole between your personality and your psyche where the connection with your instinctual drive for decision and action is lost. Fix that.
Unpin yourself from that mat yo.
In fact, for justifications he does not think he needs to present, he has stopped all motion and stands outside of life. As if others are responsible for his intertia.He's going to try to engage you in demonstrating he has an 'I' and what process all rational people should engage in to figure out what one's (authentic) 'I' is. Again, the presumption is that unless what is outside himTry wasting less time having the same fruitless conversations in a dark corner of the internet, rocking back and forward like a mad person, and more time trying to find out who you are. Once you know that, you will no longer be in conflict.
proves
what he should do
his inertia and deadness is rational.
And any not in stasis like him is 'religious' with mental contraptions.
iambiguous wrote:This is classic KT. The problem [as always] is me.
iamabiganus
Tab wrote:Oops I spelt it wrong, silly me.
Tab wrote:Save yourself time, just put iamabiganus on ignore. Worked for me.
MagsJ wrote:iambiguous wrote:This is classic KT. The problem [as always] is me.
Why do others have a problem with You?
What is it about You, that causes a problem, in Others? You don’t in me, but why, in Them/Others.
Tab wrote:Save yourself time, just put iamabiganus on ignore. Worked for me.
Tab wrote:I've literally had that guy on ignore for 7 years. 6 of them while I wasn't even here. A day or 2 ago I flipped the reveal tab on one of his undisplayed posts, thinking - "ok, it's been yonks, maybe he's turned into a normal person by now..."
WendyDarling wrote:iamabiganus
iambiguous wrote::
All I'm asking you is to broach the question of the "real me" in sync with "the right thing to do" in regard to a particular context in which your value judgments precipitated behaviors that came into conflict with another's.
That way you can describe in much more detail what, for all practical purposes, you mean by the "real me". By "identity".
Substantiate the extent to which you can know who you are when challenged regarding the aspect of "I" that I ascribe to dasein in my signature threads. Note how is this not applicable to you.
σάτυρος wrote:We can include in this category the accumulation of references to be used in prose, so as to allude to profound insights, which are nothing more than superficial posturings.
The more obscure the references, deference to, the more likely the other has no knowledge of them, increasing the sense of uniqueness - implying genius of the upper 1%.
As I've said.
True genius simplifies the complex.
Simpletons unnecessarily and intentionally complicate the simple.
Confusion of knowledge for understanding.
Hard to really figure him though. He seems utterly driven to dispense his intellectual contraptions. So driven, however, that when others refuse to share his convictions [about anything] he can't stop himself from [eventually] shifting into huff and puff mode. Then he gets booted. But that merely deprives him of the larger audience that he craves in which to dispense his pearls of wisdom.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users