MagsJ wrote:_
Do what you want!
I don't think I have to worry about what to do about what i want, at any rate, both films have promise and pull.
I'd rather see movies with a lot of latitude, and promise of deeply dramatic flair, inscriptions successful social change, without loosing the patent glimmer of the surface, while absorbing the effect of genuine and meaningful colors.
Your film used a lot of pastels, indicating a hopeful resolution, while suspending too much contrast, so as to frame the success of the mix.
The Truffaur film, mine choice, is oppositely focuses on contrasting colors, indicative a more referential descenr: in fact the emulation of the thick literality of Victor Hugo, has not successfully translated into the paper thin fragility of Adjani. The lack of optical optimism, has no promising lead into a successful embrace of both characters, the interaction stems from a very deep structural efficacy on part of the translated Hugo daughter, to the barrage of whirling emotional phenomena .
Your film , much more gracefully accepts the heaviness of the romantic sacraficd, and textually is much more evident of feminine thoughtfulness than of the mistique of sacrafice.
I am try in to make 'lovs' excluding all elss, to be the focal point between any and all dramatists personae.