"Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

The origins of the imperative, "know thyself", are lost in the sands of time, but the age-old examination of human consciousness continues here.

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Fixed Cross » Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:45 pm

Pedro I Rengel wrote:I don't think the people at Enron were having a lot of fun. One of the guys killed himself.

Haha.

Do you think Musk is still having fun?
The strong act as they may, the weak accept what they must.
- Thucydides
Image -
Before the Light - Philosophy 77 - sumofalltemples - The Magickal Tree of Life Academy

Image
User avatar
Fixed Cross
Doric Usurper
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:53 am
Location: the black ships

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Fixed Cross » Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:50 pm

Pedro I Rengel wrote:Madoff was having fun early on. But then he made a false move and suddenly he was just struggling fir his family not to lose everything. But it wasn't fun.

So it can't have been very fun from the start, because faliure was an option. He grew faster than he could cope. That's not fun. That's stressful.


Yeah, where is this threshold? Very important, where success turns from a lightness into a weight.

Arnand is probably also referring to things like referees in sports. Is that not a legitimate protection of fun?
But then the fun of sports is very limited.
The strong act as they may, the weak accept what they must.
- Thucydides
Image -
Before the Light - Philosophy 77 - sumofalltemples - The Magickal Tree of Life Academy

Image
User avatar
Fixed Cross
Doric Usurper
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:53 am
Location: the black ships

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Karpel Tunnel » Fri Aug 31, 2018 3:26 pm

Pedro I Rengel wrote:From what I've heard, Enron was a supremely stressful and abusive workplace. Everyone hated it. Was the top guy having fun?
A lot of those guys did much better in the 2008 debacle. Here they lived high for a long time and then got out and got other jobs. I think people tend to confuse mania with fun. Often in falling in love, for that matter. A denial of the driving underlying panic. No wonder a lot of the players were drawn to cocain, the mania chemical.

The 'see' their lives and possessions, they talk positive, they have high energy and their feet are not on the ground. A few flighty steps ahead of the terror.

It's be nice if they faced the consequences of their own idiocy as much other other people must.

That's on the idiots who worked for him or with him. Not on him. He was just doing his thing! But I don't think he was, because it was not a sustainable company and didn't grow and was deatined to fall.
These guys don't have a thing, so they become dopamine junkies, instead of facing their own lack of creativity or......and rush ahead into empty shit.
Karpel Tunnel
Philosopher
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 12:26 pm

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Fixed Cross » Fri Aug 31, 2018 9:42 pm

Karpel Tunnel wrote:
Pedro I Rengel wrote:From what I've heard, Enron was a supremely stressful and abusive workplace. Everyone hated it. Was the top guy having fun?
A lot of those guys did much better in the 2008 debacle. Here they lived high for a long time and then got out and got other jobs. I think people tend to confuse mania with fun. Often in falling in love, for that matter. A denial of the driving underlying panic. No wonder a lot of the players were drawn to cocain, the mania chemical.

The 'see' their lives and possessions, they talk positive, they have high energy and their feet are not on the ground. A few flighty steps ahead of the terror.

It's be nice if they faced the consequences of their own idiocy as much other other people must.

That's on the idiots who worked for him or with him. Not on him. He was just doing his thing! But I don't think he was, because it was not a sustainable company and didn't grow and was deatined to fall.
These guys don't have a thing, so they become dopamine junkies, instead of facing their own lack of creativity or......and rush ahead into empty shit.

The strong act as they may, the weak accept what they must.
- Thucydides
Image -
Before the Light - Philosophy 77 - sumofalltemples - The Magickal Tree of Life Academy

Image
User avatar
Fixed Cross
Doric Usurper
 
Posts: 11111
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:53 am
Location: the black ships

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Ierrellus » Sun Feb 21, 2021 3:18 pm

The pandemic has issued in an era of teleconferences. We no longer have to see our psychiatrists or counselors face to face. Is this the beginnings of robot psychiatry? Is the same therapy available via voice without a face? We are charged as if it is.
"We must love one another or die." W.H.Auden
I admit I'm an asshole. Now, can we get back to the conversation?
From the mad poet of McKinley Ave.
Ierrellus
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 12899
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: state of evolving

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby WendyDarling » Sun Feb 21, 2021 3:33 pm

Ierrellus wrote:The pandemic has issued in an era of teleconferences. We no longer have to see our psychiatrists or counselors face to face. Is this the beginnings of robot psychiatry? Is the same therapy available via voice without a face? We are charged as if it is.


I’m about to follow with a sarcastic joke that I don’t find funny.

Robot psychiatry, yes, talk to your Alexa or Siri (the left’s idea of progress) without an additional bill. You can rename your Alexa to Doctor in keeping with the spirit of your future, but I will have to bill you for this introductory advice.

In truth, I am angry with such progress.
Member of The Coalition of Truth - member #2/2

"facts change all the time and not only that, they don't mean anything...."-Peter Kropotkin :evilfun:
"I can hope they have some degree of self-awareness but the facts suggest that
they don't..... "- Peter Kropotkin
. :evilfun:
"you don't know the value of facts and you don't know the value of the ‘TRUTH”... " -Peter Kropotkin :lol:
User avatar
WendyDarling
Heroine
 
Posts: 8399
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:52 am
Location: Hades

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby pinkladydragon » Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:02 pm

With respect to the OP, how about this: psychiatrist/psychologist/neurologist etc., heal thyself.

There are many celebrity, and no doubt non-celebrity, mental health specialists who themselves have, often severe, mental health problems. I'm thinking here of the likes of Oliver Sacks. Oliver Sacks could not recognise faces, for example, and at parties, even his own family had to wear nametags for identification. Oliver Sacks was unable to cure himself.

A few years ago, I attended an out-patient clinic. I was seeing a medical doctor, not a mental health specialist. When I entered the room, the consultant was sitting at his desk staring at the screen of a computer whilst occasionally typing. I was invited to sit down by the nurse, not by the consultant, who still did not look at me. When the consultation began, he observed no social courtesies such as introducing himself. Instead, glancing at me briefly, he launched into the consultation and started asking me questions. Since he was reading these questions off a screen and then typing in the answers, he did not look at me. This consultant was displaying typical signs of autism.

Autism is another condition which mental health specialists are unable to cure. For example, psychologists have claimed that around 95% of the population is autistic. I believe that the percentage has increased since I last heard.

As far as I am aware, there is no mental illness, or at least very few mental illnesses, that the medical profession can cure. They may be able to alleviate symptoms, but that is a far cry from a cure. ( In fact, alleviating the symptoms without understanding their cause is likely to make the patient worse, not better.)


Therefore, as to the future of mental health treatment, since physicians are unable to heal themselves, there IS no future.
Regards,

pinkladydragon
pinkladydragon
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:51 am
Location: Scotland

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Meno_ » Mon Feb 22, 2021 7:38 pm

I kinda miss turtle. She was kinda refreshing tediously about what her counselor said about this and that.
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 8295
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Ierrellus » Tue Feb 23, 2021 3:35 pm

My psychiatrist types at a computer while asking me questions.
"We must love one another or die." W.H.Auden
I admit I'm an asshole. Now, can we get back to the conversation?
From the mad poet of McKinley Ave.
Ierrellus
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 12899
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: state of evolving

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby pinkladydragon » Tue Feb 23, 2021 5:23 pm

Ierrellus wrote:My psychiatrist types at a computer while asking me questions.


Since psychiatry treats the mind like a machine, then that hardly surprises me. But it is appalling practice, not to look at a patient. One cannot communicate effectively if one cannot see the other person's face.

On the radio this morning (BBC R4), I heard an interview with a psychologist. This clinical psychologist was notable for introducing CBT with patients who are psychotic. It really beggars belief, but the psychologist, a 64 year old man, said that it is only recently that clinical psychologists have started asking patients questions about their lives. So, when he started asking psychotics about their past, he found out that they typically had undergone experiences that were exceptionally stressful e.g. sexual abuse. (Extreme stress can bring on psychosis.)

However, the point I really want to make is that psychiatry treats the mind like a machine and diagnoses drugs, whereas psychologists treat the person. This state of affairs can only exist, of course, because science does not understand the human mind. In fact, science does not know what a human being is, let alone a mind. Neither, of course, does philosophy. Under those circumstances, how can mental illness treatments be said to have a future?
Regards,

pinkladydragon
pinkladydragon
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2019 10:51 am
Location: Scotland

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Meno_ » Wed Feb 24, 2021 3:26 am

Good point. But the machine and the mind are progressively assimilating, and hence at a critical point , and I think that is being reached., the differences will be of not much consequance
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 8295
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Ierrellus » Thu Feb 25, 2021 1:34 pm

My psychiatrist, to his credit, did look up from his keyboard occasionally to see me back when we had face to face meetings. He once remarked that from his cubicle he saw me walking across the parking lot to get to our conference. That's probably as personal as he is allowed to be.
"We must love one another or die." W.H.Auden
I admit I'm an asshole. Now, can we get back to the conversation?
From the mad poet of McKinley Ave.
Ierrellus
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 12899
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 12:52 pm
Location: state of evolving

Re: "Mental" Illness: The Future of Treatment

Postby Meno_ » Fri Feb 26, 2021 3:59 am

Ierrellus wrote:My psychiatrist, to his credit, did look up from his keyboard occasionally to see me back when we had face to face meetings. He once remarked that from his cubicle he saw me walking across the parking lot to get to our conference. That's probably as personal as he is allowed to be.




Perhaps he has to have heads up from AI...


Just say'n
Meno_
breathless
 
Posts: 8295
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 2:39 am
Location: Mysterium Tremendum

Previous

Return to Psychology and Mind



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users