Mowk wrote:And the back story of these musicians is pretty cool too. Individually and in combination. Janis Joplin, Jimmy Hendricks, James Taylor, Jim Croce, Steven Stills, David Crosby, Niel Young, I'm all in.
It's easier to win a battle than it is to conquer one' self.
Mowk wrote:slow and steady gets you along on the road, an accord.
Meno_ wrote:Objectivity is beyond the nihilistic interpretation of a looking glass dasein. Cosmic intelligence overcomes any total de-difference into absurdity.
That is not easy to fathom, but those who stared unto the unfathomable abyss are forced to acknowledge it.
All nihilistic denials result in progressive projections based on diminishing actuality.
Meno_ wrote:75, Sil.et al. ; you don't wish You were in my shoes.
The thing is well, the old formula-de-differentiation, then re-partial integration, letting it fall naturally as a new given.
That can not be let go, the bind becomes the new reality:
Exuberant teleportation wrote:
"But the idea that we were seeded from some kind of quantum source in a larger ocean, like timeless genesis coming from a never ending nirvana could be quite harmonious."
in a uniform space time.
Paraphrasing this does not consist of an apology to opportune new friendships based on a changed partial reconstruction, but describes awareness of cosmic processes which hold it together iron clad, and from which absolute separation appears impossible.
This awareness drops all pretensions to otherwise explaining it: because the macro and micro economic relationships that precludes any and all interpersonal doubt.
Objectivity is beyond the nihilistic interpretation of a looking glass dasein. Cosmic intelligence overcomes any total de-difference into absurdity.
That is not easy to fathom, but those who stared unto the unfathomable abyss are forced to acknowledge it.
All nihilistic denials result in progressive projections based on diminishing actuality.
logically (locally) prior to spacetime.
iambiguous wrote:Meno_ wrote:Objectivity is beyond the nihilistic interpretation of a looking glass dasein. Cosmic intelligence overcomes any total de-difference into absurdity.
That is not easy to fathom, but those who stared unto the unfathomable abyss are forced to acknowledge it.
All nihilistic denials result in progressive projections based on diminishing actuality.
I challenge you -- no, I dare you -- to bring this argument out into the world of human interactions and note how "for all practical purposes" it has profound implications in grappling to understand the "human condition".
Also, how does a grasp of this, given an in depth exploration of a particular set of real world interactions, reinforce for you the belief that philosophy is not for the feint of heart.
Meno_ wrote:iambiguous wrote:Meno_ wrote:Objectivity is beyond the nihilistic interpretation of a looking glass dasein. Cosmic intelligence overcomes any total de-difference into absurdity.
That is not easy to fathom, but those who stared unto the unfathomable abyss are forced to acknowledge it.
All nihilistic denials result in progressive projections based on diminishing actuality.
I challenge you -- no, I dare you -- to bring this argument out into the world of human interactions and note how "for all practical purposes" it has profound implications in grappling to understand the "human condition".
Also, how does a grasp of this, given an in depth exploration of a particular set of real world interactions, reinforce for you the belief that philosophy is not for the feint of heart.
The beginning of the word gives the idea of sub stance meaning as a positional qualifier for series of.vanishing points by which reality re-affirms it's self in a plathera of.possibilities.
The point 'being' toward it's absolute zero-sum in any particular existence.
The reality of this actualization implies or.is inferred from a state of no possible partial differentials that are constantly deprived from memory, since all potential content has meaning in particular situations.
Even if, the gaps between forgotten sets require multiple senses of symbolic form, they still can be connected and made into phenomes of.near identifiable or distinguishable particulars. These are particles which have no stasis in eternity, but are the primal elements of.absolute chaos , tirelessly and spatially recreating particularity , and sense.
The evolution of.the 'word' into any number.of.cognitive states create paradigms of.projected.insivisually identifiable sets (binomial -objective.senses a necessary process, and regression toward such absolute states is a requirement in all sensation
Now.prove it. The Darwinian evolution is a reverse image of.the devolution into a.philosophical and psychological regression of.lesser.symbolic.content, meaning approach into a state of existence where.the last.object.is one set where everything belongs into it including it's self
Objectivity is a dynamic of.intentive set of conduits ,(neural pathways) where signification approaches an ideal set of agreed upon clarity.
That such lack of meaning is utilizes as a.form of necessity, is becoming the mode of realization.
Uncertainty progressing.with increasing uncertainty is the cause of.simulated intelligence.
It travels faster then the reified linear established circuitry of.traditional behavior, therefore it is not.for the faint.of heart, who are unable or unwilling to process this , which started with Descartes-Leibnitz-Nietzche.
How real is this? As real as my corresponding with You Iambigious, in my opinion. How down to earth? Well , most humans are.unwilling to paticipate.
Meno_ wrote:Reductions toward absurdity are veiled as ironic. But still they operate with methodical logic .
iambiguous wrote:Meno_ wrote:Reductions toward absurdity are veiled as ironic. But still they operate with methodical logic .
I'll take that as a maybe.
iambiguous wrote:Meno_ wrote:Reductions toward absurdity are veiled as ironic. But still they operate with methodical logic .
I'll take that as a maybe.
Meno_ wrote:iambiguous wrote:Meno_ wrote:Reductions toward absurdity are veiled as ironic. But still they operate with methodical logic .
I'll take that as a maybe.
Ok fair enough.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users