Ecmandu wrote:I always say that people do for god is what they’d want to be done to them if they were god:
Bowing, kneeling, sacrificing, praying, paying alms, going to a temple (or church or synagogue), spreading the word of how great god is! in their honor...
People are sick in the head!
And hypocrites! God, as they define god, needs NOTHING from us!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspectivism
Fixed Cross wrote:Wits must he have | who wanders wide.
We experience reality through a combination of senses.
Language is a form of information.
Information can be fabricated, created, destroyed.
Knowledge comes from experiences, and language.
Language is symbols associated with meanings.
Language exists in part as induction.
Without experiences, language is incomplete.
Good atheism is where you don't over step your philosophical boundries
by making claims about gods that are invisible.
This doesn't mean ya all up and hate christians, for example.
It just descends from agnosticism.
"I can't know right now, therefor I don't believe right now."
If a god appeared to faust and asked him to kill a baby,
what would he do?
Well, if it is a god, it doesn't need a dead baby.
It's like a fat man demanding more food, even though he already has too much.
Also, dead babies are less responsive than live babies.
So, if god doesn't make sense, morally,
then god shouldn't be followed, even if he exists somewhere hidden in a pocket of nebula.
omar wrote:Hello Dan
I don't think that language is a form of information but rather how we learn to organize information for easy exchange.
Well, my objection to agnosticism is the impossibility of knowing itself, now or in the future.
Dan~ wrote:Well, my objection to agnosticism is the impossibility of knowing itself, now or in the future.
You've made a mistake,
because it is impossible to know if knowing is impossible to know.
Hahaha.
You've made a mistake,
because it is impossible to know if knowing is impossible to know.
Hahaha.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users