Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Sun Jan 16, 2022 1:44 am

iambiguous wrote:
MagsJ wrote:
Maia wrote:+++On the one hand, you agree that given new experiences, new relationships, and access to new information and knowledge, you might find yourself tumbling down into the hole with me. And yet another part of you seems absolutely adamant that this could never happen. Not to *you*.

Just as, with me, I can't rule out the same from my end and you succeed in bringing me up out of the hole.+++

No, I don't agree that given new experiences etc. I might go down your hole. I might change my opinions on all sorts of issues, but that's not the same thing at all.

The man is obsessed with his hole. [sorry Maia.. I couldn’t help it, in cracking that joke] lol.

I also need to search up on Pagan sexual practices, to see what the specifics of Pagan sexual practices actually are.. tho I think I saw a video of pagan practices on KTS a while back.

I've come to the conclusion that, with Maia, our arguments are just going around and around in the same futile circles. I respect her intelligence, of course, but it does not flow in the same direction -- philosophically -- as mine does.

You always say that, about all the girls. :-s

I'm convinced now that only if one of us encounters a new experience, a new relationship or access to new information and knowledge are we ever likely to "get" each other better than we do.

But what about you?

What about the hole that you are not in in regard to sexual behaviors? Avoiding altogether the "creepy" part where the discussion actually names them, we can keep this..."philosophical".

I think it’s simply called 'abstinence'. I’ve rarely dated, and I prefer it that way.. though if I met someone that really truly got me, they’d get my attention, as I’m not interested in anything less.

Now what do I mean by being down in a hole here?

I mean that many, in not being down in the hole "I" am in, have convinced themselves that their own opinions about sex -- celibacy, swinging, homosexuality, fetishes etc. -- reflect either the optimal or the only rational manner in which to behave sexually. Those convinced that they possess a Real Me in sync with The Right Thing To Do.

Such preferences are personal to the individual.. the same as who we’re attracted to, in that that cannot be dictated either.. arranged marriages, not permitting.

I’ve met people that are into all manner of things, but I’ve never made them my manner of things. I’m a voyeur of life, not a partaker.. tho I don’t like being p’d off or annoyed by others, when being talked all manner of tripe to.

Whereas my point to Maia is that her own assumptions, now rooted in the Goddess/Nature, unfolded largely because, given the life she lived, she was predisposed existentially to think this instead of that. And she even agrees that had her life been different, she might be in here, instead, embracing the Wicker Man mentality about sex. Also, that given new experiences, relationships, etc., she might be in here down the road championing sexual choices more in sync with, say, Dionysus. Think, say, the Patricia Kennealy character in the The Doors movie.

The 70s sexual revolution? Go you!

I’ve found, that more people are sexually subversive, than not.. each to their own, huh. :D

And yet even in acknowledging this she still insists that her own relationship with the Goddess/Nature is such that she can never tumble down into my hole. Something, what, mystical or magical in her "soul" that controls these things in her? The part I ever struggle to grasp by encouraging her to go beyond just knowing "it's the right thing to do".

Also, being down in the hole, while certainly demoralizing in important respects, does have its benefits as well. Once you recognize that your sexual choices are not anchored to your own rendition of the One True Path, your sexual options can explode. You can pursue experiences that bring you all manner of pleasure and fulfilment without having to stop over and over and over again to ask yourself, "will God or the Goddess or my comrades or colleagues or family or friends or 'society' disapprove of it"?

So, interested in exploring this more in depth? Deconstructing your own existential "I" in regard to your own sexual convictions? Putting it at risk if my own frame of mind comes to actually seem reasonable to you as well?

I’m happy for you, and others, no matter what your sexual choices may be.. as mine should also be, for you, and others.

I’ve only just read your/this post, as I’ve been incrementally replying to it.. I wasn’t expecting that last/quoted part ^^^ 8-[ lol

..and what is your 'own frame of mind', in regard to this matter?

You know me. I'm less interested in what people believe about "celibacy, swinging, homosexuality, fetishes etc." and more interested in the extent to which they have thought through how and why they came to believe this instead of that.

..perhaps this might help you understand, more optimally.

921CC5C3-8B4B-4AD7-9399-DE06EA544AFF.jpeg
921CC5C3-8B4B-4AD7-9399-DE06EA544AFF.jpeg (30.11 KiB) Viewed 698 times

And then, given conflicting assessments, the extent to which, in a philosophy forum, it may or may not be possible to arrive at the optimal point of view.

..if I haven’t achieved any of that ^^^ in my reply, do please let me know, and I will try to rectify it.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby iambiguous » Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:14 pm

iambiguous wrote:I'm convinced now that only if one of us encounters a new experience, a new relationship or access to new information and knowledge are we ever likely to "get" each other better than we do.

But what about you?

What about the hole that you are not in in regard to sexual behaviors? Avoiding altogether the "creepy" part where the discussion actually names them, we can keep this..."philosophical".


MagsJ wrote: I think it’s simply called 'abstinence'. I’ve rarely dated, and I prefer it that way.. though if I met someone that really truly got me, they’d get my attention, as I’m not interested in anything less.


Yes, but some choose abstinence and others don't. My point always revolves around this distinction:

1] I choose abstinence because the profoundly problematic confluence of existential variables in my life -- rooted in dasein -- have come to predispose me "here and now" to choose it. For Maia it was the manner in which her life brought her to Paganism and the Goddess. Same with you and your choices. Same with me and mine.

2] there is a way, scientifically, philosophically, deontologically, spiritually etc., to think it all through and arrive at the most reasonable [and then, for many, most virtuous] assessment.

Only, as with morality, Maia's commitment to celibacy, is beyond my being able to grasp. It is somehow derived from her "intuitions" more so than nature itself. But these intuitions...how are they too not just another manifestation of dasein?

Same with what "gets your own attention" sexually. In fact, what gets the attention of others is not abstinence or celibacy but just the opposite: debauchery, swinging, homosexuality, pornography, fetishes, orgies. Like the characters in Shortbus: https://youtu.be/_YVml-7iAbI

Again, though, what is far more interesting to me is not what you and I and Maia do or do not do sexually, but how what any of us do is deeply intertwined existentially in the manner in which our actual lived lives, taking us in very different directions, predisposed you and I and Maia to go here and not there.

And that is important because once we grasp how our own choices were shaped and molded by our very different experiences, relationships and access to information, we can come into places like this and communicate those differences in order to [possibly] come up with [for philosophers] the most deontologically sound obligations that rationally men and women can embrace.

Or, as those like Satyr do, root philosophy itself in nature. But only his own assessment of nature of course.

Now what do I mean by being down in a hole here?

I mean that many, in not being down in the hole "I" am in, have convinced themselves that their own opinions about sex -- celibacy, swinging, homosexuality, fetishes etc. -- reflect either the optimal or the only rational manner in which to behave sexually. Those convinced that they possess a Real Me in sync with The Right Thing To Do.


MagsJ wrote: Such preferences are personal to the individual.. the same as who we’re attracted to, in that that cannot be dictated either.. arranged marriages, not permitting.


But, again, that just begs the question: why do individual preferences among us vary so widely? Why your set of sexual behaviors and not those of others? If not my own personal conclusion here rooted in dasein then perhaps yours? Yours however being just like mine, just like Maia's: the embodiment of dasein.

MagsJ wrote: I’ve met people that are into all manner of things, but I’ve never made them my manner of things. I’m a voyeur of life, not a partaker.. tho I don’t like being p’d off or annoyed by others, when being talked all manner of tripe to.


Sexual tripe? And what might that be? Me, the line I draw is between sex among consenting adults and sex that is not consented to. Adam stalking Maia for example. For sex, presumably. Though, even here, there are those who argue that stalking [even rape] is perfectly "natural". Men are genetically programed to spread their seed. Those like "feminists" however just don't "get" it.

Whereas my point to Maia is that her own assumptions, now rooted in the Goddess/Nature, unfolded largely because, given the life she lived, she was predisposed existentially to think this instead of that. And she even agrees that had her life been different, she might be in here, instead, embracing the Wicker Man mentality about sex. Also, that given new experiences, relationships, etc., she might be in here down the road championing sexual choices more in sync with, say, Dionysus. Think, say, the Patricia Kennealy character in the The Doors movie.


MagsJ wrote: The 70s sexual revolution? Go you!


Yes, some are all about liberating us from sexual repression. But the law of unintended consequences is no less applicable here. And it is still women who are most susceptible to STD. And it is only women who might end up pregnant.

But it is still Maia's thinking about all this -- her 6 or 7 year commitment to the Goddess to be celibate -- that is beyond my understanding. To give up all of that pleasure, intimacy, potential for a lasting love...for what? What brought her to such a prolonged -- extreme? -- commitment? Or could it just be that her past sexual/romantic relationships were so unfulfilling that she needed a 'bigger reason" than that to end them. A "spiritual" reason?

Then back to "the hole". How [sexually or otherwise] she is convinced she can never tumble down into it herself.

And yet even in acknowledging this she still insists that her own relationship with the Goddess/Nature is such that she can never tumble down into my hole. Something, what, mystical or magical in her "soul" that controls these things in her? The part I ever struggle to grasp by encouraging her to go beyond just knowing "it's the right thing to do".

Also, being down in the hole, while certainly demoralizing in important respects, does have its benefits as well. Once you recognize that your sexual choices are not anchored to your own rendition of the One True Path, your sexual options can explode. You can pursue experiences that bring you all manner of pleasure and fulfilment without having to stop over and over and over again to ask yourself, "will God or the Goddess or my comrades or colleagues or family or friends or 'society' disapprove of it"?

So, interested in exploring this more in depth? Deconstructing your own existential "I" in regard to your own sexual convictions? Putting it at risk if my own frame of mind comes to actually seem reasonable to you as well?


MagsJ wrote: I’m happy for you, and others, no matter what your sexual choices may be.. as mine should also be, for you, and others.


Happy, yes, but only because the manner in which I construe our "private and personal" emotional reactions to sex are in turn but the embodiment of dasein. Had your own life been very different, happiness might be the last thing you feel.

As for this...

"I am not what happened to me; I am what I choose to become." Carl Jung.

...to be perfectly honest it seems rather ridiculous. How on earth could what happened to us in the past [sexually or otherwise] not have a profound impact on what we choose to become [sexually or otherwise] in the present.

I must be missing his point.
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=176529
Then here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 5&t=185296
And here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 45610
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: hanging out with godot

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby iambiguous » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:33 pm

wrong thread
Last edited by iambiguous on Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=176529
Then here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 5&t=185296
And here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 45610
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: hanging out with godot

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby iambiguous » Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:35 pm

wrong thread
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=176529
Then here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 5&t=185296
And here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 45610
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: hanging out with godot

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Sculptor » Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:55 pm

iambiguous wrote:First, of course, since this thread exists as a result of an exchange between Maia and myself here...

https://ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p ... 1&start=50

...my focus will be on heterosexual relationships.

But it could just as easily be applicable to LGBTQ exchanges here as well.


Edify us.

none of this would even come up if Maia's picture was more like this...
image_2022-01-18_205343.png
image_2022-01-18_205343.png (60.78 KiB) Viewed 672 times


Rather than to mysterious and sexy image of her that is used as her avatar.
What's funny is that Maia could just look like this or that or anything else.
Sculptor
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2246
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 10:52 pm

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby iambiguous » Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:46 pm

Sculptor wrote:
iambiguous wrote:First, of course, since this thread exists as a result of an exchange between Maia and myself here...

https://ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopic.p ... 1&start=50

...my focus will be on heterosexual relationships.

But it could just as easily be applicable to LGBTQ exchanges here as well.


Edify us.

none of this would even come up if Maia's picture was more like this...
image_2022-01-18_205343.png


Rather than to mysterious and sexy image of her that is used as her avatar.
What's funny is that Maia could just look like this or that or anything else.


Of course, since she is basically covering her face with her hand, she may well look like this. The irony being that in having been blind since birth, none of that "looks" stuff means anything to her at all. Then the mysterious part that revolves around whether the reaction of sighted men to "looks" [gay or straight] is derived more from genes or memes.

And, as she noted, being "sexy and mysterious" was not the intent of either herself or her brother. That's what men [even in philosophy forums] bring to the table. One in particular to the point of actually stalking her.
He was like a man who wanted to change all; and could not; so burned with his impotence; and had only me, an infinitely small microcosm to convert or detest. John Fowles

Start here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=176529
Then here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 5&t=185296
And here: http://www.ilovephilosophy.com/viewtopi ... 1&t=194382
User avatar
iambiguous
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 45610
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:03 pm
Location: hanging out with godot

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:12 pm

_
Deleted.. pressed submit, instead of save draft
Last edited by MagsJ on Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Jan 25, 2022 5:16 pm

MagsJ ... I don’t even like talking or responding to you anymore.

You are so evil, and so stupid, it’s mind blowing.

Let’s say that I’m a rape sexual. I kidnap people and lock them in a basement for 50 years.

Apparently that’s cool to you.

I fucking hate you bitch. And it’s really hard to get me to hate someone.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:45 pm

_
To the OP author.. I have reported the below post.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Jan 25, 2022 8:55 pm

MagsJ wrote:_
To the OP author.. I have reported the below post.


You’ve always been chomping at the bit with me haven’t you.

I guarantee you, that thinking being a rape sexual is awesome, but my post is disreputable!!!

Is laughable.

I didn’t report you. I could have.

Read your own fucking words ...

“As long as I don’t bother you about your sexual choices, you shouldn’t bother me about my sexual choices”

Let’s let it go if you want and just chalk it up to a mistake on a magnitude you didn’t understand.

Like a child putting a fork in an electrical socket.

You’ve already stated on these boards that you prefer to be evil instead of vulnerable.

Do you really want to get into this with me?

Your psychology on ILP?
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:14 pm

MagsJ wrote:_
To the OP author.. FYI, I have reported the above post.

..and that post ^^^ for unnecessary harassing and hounding.. trolling.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:21 pm

MagsJ wrote:
MagsJ wrote:_
To the OP author.. FYI, I have reported the above post.

..and that post ^^^ for unnecessary harassing and hounding.. trolling.


There’s something called print. Like, stuff you really wrote. That I really responded to.

Stuff you really wrote.

You have no clout in ILP... when it comes to accusing me as a stalker or an offensive poster in general.

I on the other hand can make those arguments.

You’ve always wanted to see me banned.

But you never debate me. Your philosophy (entirely) is, “I have tits and a pussy and it’s not fair that I actually have to debate someone”

That’s why you’re not a moderator anymore.

Everyone on these boards knows you’ve never debated me on anything for more than one post, when I replied... you banned me for 4 days.

Your only argument on ILP is female entitlement.

And you deserve to hear that.

Do I want to ban you? No.

People with Down’s syndrome deserve a voice too.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:42 pm

And another thing Mag,

Can’t take what you dish out?

Does it bother you that a man can go there with you better than you can as a woman ?

Or as you say, “a woman’s perogative”

Yeah, I remember your posts.

I’m not stalking you Mag. That has always been your narcissism.

Whenever you’re wrong about something, you cry “he’s a man stalking a female!” “Everyone help!”

I’m just pushing your narcissistic buttons. And you can’t handle it. I’ve basically left you alone for 2 years. A few replies... but not actually digging into you.

When you made the statement that rape sexual deserve respect...

You came on my radar again.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Tue Jan 25, 2022 9:48 pm

One more simple post Mag.

I’m not going to let you (under any circumstance)

Let you get away with the idea that you should respect everyone’s sexual choices.

That’s like saying you should respect everyone’s homicides.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby A Shieldmaiden » Wed Jan 26, 2022 1:10 pm

Ecmandu wrote:

One more simple post Mag.

I’m not going to let you (under any circumstance)

Let you get away with the idea that you should respect everyone’s sexual choices.

That’s like saying you should respect everyone’s homicides.


Good for you Ecmandu

Well said!
The man that walks his own road, walks alone

Old Norse Proverb
User avatar
A Shieldmaiden
Philosopher
 
Posts: 2218
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 6:13 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Wed Jan 26, 2022 2:51 pm

_
Lol
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Thu Jan 27, 2022 10:46 pm

MagsJ wrote:_
Lol


Mag hasn’t figured out that she lives forever yet.

She’ll figure it out. Then suddenly she’ll realize that not planning your entire forever is a waste of life.

I’m not worried about her sociopathy ...

She’ll figure it out eventually.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Dan~ » Fri Jan 28, 2022 4:58 am

Ecmandu wrote:MagsJ ... I don’t even like talking or responding to you anymore.

You are so evil, and so stupid, it’s mind blowing.

Let’s say that I’m a rape sexual. I kidnap people and lock them in a basement for 50 years.

Apparently that’s cool to you.

I fucking hate you bitch. And it’s really hard to get me to hate someone.


If you keep this up i may ban you.
I like http://www.accuradio.com , internet radio.
https://dannerz.itch.io/ -- a new and minimal webside now hosting my free game projects.
ImageImage
Truth is based in sensing, in vision. And we can only see when we are alive.
User avatar
Dan~
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Canada Alberta

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Fri Jan 28, 2022 7:58 am

Dan~ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:MagsJ ... I don’t even like talking or responding to you anymore.

You are so evil, and so stupid, it’s mind blowing.

Let’s say that I’m a rape sexual. I kidnap people and lock them in a basement for 50 years.

Apparently that’s cool to you.

I fucking hate you bitch. And it’s really hard to get me to hate someone.


If you keep this up i may ban you.


I grow wild hairs sometimes.

Sometimes my wild hairs are direct. I’ll say what mag is saying without being ... mmm... how should I say, as subversive as she is.

Point taken.

Context needs to be understood though.

To be honest, she’s said worse things in this board than I’ve ever said.

Mag believes that rape sexuals ((like lgbtq(r - r for rape sexuals) deserve sexual respect. I’m not even talking about mutual subtle rape - just straight up rape.

She thinks that’s cool shit.

It pissed me off.

You be the judge of who’s in the wrong here.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby gib » Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:03 am

Dan~ wrote:If you keep this up i may ban you.


Woaw, Dan wielding the iron fist of the moderator.

I think this threat should get back on topic. What is edification, and what does it have to do with male/female exchanges on ILP? Does this thread really deserve that title? OR should it have been titled "Edification (whatever that means) and Biggy/Maia exchanges at ILP"? Has Biggy branched out and touched upon other male/female exchanges at ILP (I'll confess: I haven't read the whole thread)? These last few exchanges would be perfect for discussion... Ecmandu/MagsJ exchanges--the dynamics therein and what that implies for modern society. We even have a point of contrast in Shieldmaiden--one woman against, one woman in defense--and Ecmandu, the shining star, caught in the middle. This could go deep.
My thoughts | My art | My music | My poetry

"Oh Charlie! I’m respecting your privacy by knocking but asserting my authority as your father by coming in anyway!"
- Lucifer

"She's so small, she mostly looks like a potato with eyes."
- Lucifer on his daughter

"Stop talking to me like I'm your enemy. You wept for all of those girl- and boyfriends, but you have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That those break ups, while tragic, probably saved you from a crappy and very expensive first marriage."
- Lucifer
User avatar
gib
resident exorcist
 
Posts: 9285
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 10:25 pm
Location: in your mom

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:20 am

Dan,

I’ll give you a little insight into mag.

She’s stubborn to a huge fault. I’ve been there myself.

She can’t admit she’s ever made a mistake.

At this point in my life, I understand everything I did was a mistake.

That’s the difference between me and someone like mag.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Dan~ » Fri Jan 28, 2022 8:54 am

Ecmandu wrote:Dan,

I’ll give you a little insight into mag.

She’s stubborn to a huge fault. I’ve been there myself.

She can’t admit she’s ever made a mistake.

At this point in my life, I understand everything I did was a mistake.

That’s the difference between me and someone like mag.


Sometimes you say really nasty shit.
I like http://www.accuradio.com , internet radio.
https://dannerz.itch.io/ -- a new and minimal webside now hosting my free game projects.
ImageImage
Truth is based in sensing, in vision. And we can only see when we are alive.
User avatar
Dan~
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 10988
Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Canada Alberta

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:01 am

Dan~ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:Dan,

I’ll give you a little insight into mag.

She’s stubborn to a huge fault. I’ve been there myself.

She can’t admit she’s ever made a mistake.

At this point in my life, I understand everything I did was a mistake.

That’s the difference between me and someone like mag.


Sometimes you say really nasty shit.


Of course I do. It’s a nasty fucking cosmos that I work 24/7 to try to fix while many are sleeping on the job.

Did you think you could walk through this without a simple word sword?

It doesn’t work that way man.

Be thankful for what you have. Seriously.

I’m not here to hurt people. I’m here to wake them the fuck up.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby MagsJ » Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:37 am

Dan~ wrote:Sometimes you say really nasty shit.

The guy has concocted all that crap in his head and then verbally attacks me for things he thinks I’ve said.. I don’t argue with the clueless, and have told the person so many many times, but then crap like this happens, when I’ve built up an exchange with others.

@Gib.. not gonna happen.. for Shield to enable someone’s imaginary crap, shows that her intention is a malevolent one, in egging on such behaviour. I guess people with issues eventually find each other and tag team up, to troll others. [I don’t engage with Shield.. hence her (unnecessary) input here, to get herself on the radar]

Shield and he can start a discussion on edification of male/female exchanges here, at ILP.. I’ll remember not to read.. :lol:
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite.. ~MagsJ

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get back that time, and I may need it for something important at some point in time.. Huh!? ~MagsJ

You’re suggestions and I just simply don’t mix.. like oil on water, or a very bad DJ ~MagsJ

Examine what is said, not him who speaks ~Arab proverb

aes Sanātana Dharma Pali: the eternal way ~it should not be rigid, but inclusive of the best of all knowledge for the sake of Ṛta.. which is endless.
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist: a chic geek
 
Posts: 24247
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: Suryaloka / LDN Town

Re: Edification and male/female exchanges at ILP.

Postby Ecmandu » Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:45 am

Mag. You have no clue what you’re dealing with.

In the demonic realms. You’d easily be sent to hell for saying everyone should respect everyone’s sexual orientation.

I’m arguing against it by declaring you mentally retarded.

I know that’s a hard blow for you, but you don’t want to see the other side.

I’m not trying to hurt you Mag.

Your comprehension of all this is so fucking small that I had to declare you mentally retarded to help you.

And here you are, thinking I’m the enemy.

I’m not your enemy.

Your mind is so confused that you can’t actually see how reality works.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 15109
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

PreviousNext

Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users