I’m not weak nor strong, I have arguments.
Judge them.
Yeah it’s sad that I’ve not made an attempt to learn ur stuff - I actually read ur link though, and I liked the statement “The I is thus always an activity.”
But I still don’t really know what VO does.
I try to bring up Experientialism only when it has a direct application and solves some previously seemingly paradoxical dilemma. On its own it’s probably pretty dry and like “so what?”, just like VO.
I’m no expert on VO, just like you’re no expert on Experientialism - I present my criticisms on what I think you’re talking about and you say that’s not what you’re saying. That’s fine, I accepted that. You’re still happy to throw out statements about how I’m “not much of an expert on Experience” - on that other thread you made, though. If there’s anything I’ve learned on these forums it’s that arguing past one another is truly empty.
There’s a lot of emotional baggage to get through to debate with you though, which makes me feel like I can’t really be bothered to talk with you. I don’t really care if you’re butthurt or you don’t like my politics - logic stands regardless.
Be proud of your mental creation by all means, I’ve never thought of you as unintelligent even if you’re a bit weird about some topics in a way that makes me doubt your sanity more than your logical capability.