Ad Hominem

This is the main board for discussing philosophy - formal, informal and in between.

Ad Hominem

Postby Guide » Fri Feb 01, 2019 2:47 am

Ad Hominem has at least four major meanings, most people conflate the first and second in the now most publicly powerful manner, and so show themselves as accomplished upholders of foolishness. A few know the relatively trivial third, and fewer still the momentous fourth.

To understand a word is to know why one is using it. What aims it furthers, and to weigh thoughtfully if it is the right way to that aim, rather than the burial of that aim. It is never to cite mindlessly a string of words called the definition.
Guide
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:20 am

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby Mr Reasonable » Fri Feb 01, 2019 6:42 am

You can't prove any of that.
You see...a pimp's love is very different from that of a square.
Dating a stripper is like eating a noisy bag of chips in church. Everyone looks at you in disgust, but deep down they want some too.

What exactly is logic? -Magnus Anderson

Support the innocence project on AmazonSmile instead of Turd's African savior biker dude.
http://www.innocenceproject.org/
User avatar
Mr Reasonable
resident contrarian
 
Posts: 25948
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 8:54 am
Location: pimping a hole straight through the stratosphere itself

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby Guide » Tue Mar 05, 2019 4:40 am

Post saved.
Guide
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:20 am

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby Guide » Mon Mar 11, 2019 3:23 am

Post restored, due to its uttermost importance to human beings and all life on the earth.
Guide
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:20 am

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby MagsJ » Tue Mar 12, 2019 12:16 am

Guide wrote:Ad Hominem has at least four major meanings, most people conflate the first and second in the now most publicly powerful manner, and so show themselves as accomplished upholders of foolishness. A few know the relatively trivial third, and fewer still the momentous fourth.

To understand a word is to know why one is using it. What aims it furthers, and to weigh thoughtfully if it is the right way to that aim, rather than the burial of that aim. It is never to cite mindlessly a string of words called the definition.

Wouldn't that be dependent on the arena you are in, and the agreed rules of that debating arena..? I see you have brought your own rules with you. :wink:

We have a Chamber of Debate, if you would like to set up a more.. formal discussion.. complete with ad hominem agreed.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18705
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby Guide » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:05 am

First we might specify what the phrase names, which confusion over is at issue of the post. Ergo, you might try reading it before arrogantly prating with befouled black lips.
Guide
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:20 am

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby MagsJ » Tue Mar 12, 2019 1:30 am

Guide wrote:First we might specify what the phrase names, which confusion over is at issue of the post. Ergo, you might try reading it before arrogantly prating with befouled black lips.

Mine brown eyes read the OP loud and clear, but mine Moderator eyes answered you from lips that spake from authority.

I have already read elsewhere, on what you view ad Hominem as/the gear in which you choose to drive it in.. should I know more than that? is my ignorance preceding me, on the matter?

Ad Hominem and Related Arguments: Ad Personem, ad Feminam, Tu Quoque, Poisoning the Well, Guilt by Association, and Genetic Fallacy

https://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/person.html
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18705
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby Guide » Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:47 am

No, you don't know what it means, or have the slightest idea what it is to think and be solicitous for the possibility of thought. Your foolishness is just the awful difficulty the thinking part of the community is posed with. Passing to authorities only makes your rank imbecility more obvious. You simply have no inkling of what philosophy is. You think its a game made up some time in the past by academics.
Guide
 
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2018 2:20 am

Re: Ad Hominem

Postby MagsJ » Tue Mar 12, 2019 4:34 am

Guide wrote:No, you don't know what it means, or have the slightest idea what it is to think and be solicitous for the possibility of thought. Your foolishness is just the awful difficulty the thinking part of the community is posed with. Passing to authorities only makes your rank imbecility more obvious. You simply have no inkling of what philosophy is. You think its a game made up some time in the past by academics.
There you go again.. with your flattering of Mags.

You simply have no inkling of what philosophy is. You think its a game made up some time in the past by academics.
..and why would you think that?

I would say that philosophy has been turned into a game through academia, but that it started with the very first sentient thought, of which that moment in time has never been given any credit, because of the egotistical want to own everything that enchants/endears/creates.. labeling human processes does not qualify for ownership of them, akin to kicking over a sandcastle on the beach and making a bigger and better one.. reflective of the destroyer's ego, which is reflective of the human condition in general.

The problem is not with thinking, but in the ability to get out our thoughts/express them/execute them, as there should be a resulting outcome or conclusion, or why have thoughts to begin with, if not to gain from them. There's only so much thinking a person can do, before the need to do manifests.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

I haven't got the time to spend the time reading something that is telling me nothing, as I will never be able to get that time back, and I may need it for something at some point in time. Wait! What?

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 18705
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1


Return to Philosophy



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]