Mr Reasonable wrote:None of that stuff is real.
Reasonable,
Some things are beyond human understanding , and this is one with that kind of built in requirement.
Some of it may be, actually seem unreal, but all of it supposes a real. I almost had a chance for a regression, about 10 years ago but the guy stopped it for some reason.
His stopping short was surprising , but he never defined it sufficiently to come to any conclusion.
Maia,
re:
'i may be blind so as to better hear. It would raise me from the level of contradiction,' (self quote) from previous post.
It is said, that senses are compensatory. Senses may be sorted into two kinds, primary, consisting of seeing, hearing, feeling, the sense of smell, and then the secondary ones of, the sense to belong, the sense to participate, the sense to withold information, the sense to express, or to impress.
In that regard the novel 'Sense and Sensibility' almost has a philosophical treatise about it, but at any rate, even if it isn't philosophy oriented , it is a catchall title, whereby one can mistakenly read into.
To have that sense for irony, that always may temper the brute difference , ought to be recognized across the board , instead it may only be signaled where compensations for sense deprivation take place.
There is a hidden paradox here, where this taking place may hide deeper pockets of awareness and understanding, which may or may not be accessible to others.
So at times such paradox manifests as an appearent negation, and it is in the spirit of that type of consciousness that the above comment was made.
I write this as an expression to further fine tune the impression that the comment was not merely off the cuff.
The point being, that such compensations may work for, or against the intent of those concerned.