5,5,3 rule

For discussions of culture, politics, economics, sociology, law, business and any other topic that falls under the social science remit.

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby Ecmandu » Sat Dec 08, 2018 7:56 pm

MagsJ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:MagsJ,

I think you're assuming that since only men who act out can be sexually intimate with women, that I have this huge sympathy and heart of compassion for those men. I don't.

I said:
..it is what it is, and that does not concern anybody else but the subject, who is not responsible for the destructive reaction of males. Do they not know any better? Oh, I forget.. they're not using their mind at this point, are they.

I meant:
..it is what it is, and that does not concern anybody else but the subject/the female, who is not responsible for the destructive reaction of males. Do they not know any better? Oh, I forget.. they're not using their mind at this point, are they.

I know that you have very little.. if any, sympathy and heart of compassion for men who act out, to attract, and be sexually intimate with, women. As you can see by my small edit, in pink, it is the female that shouldn't be held responsible for the destructive reaction of males, and females can also be destructive too.. when they are spurned/don't get their own way/another female gets the man or things they desire.

Oh the things females do too!


It's more nuanced than that MagsJ.

We know how to force adolescent boys and girls to commit suicide with bullying. There's a science to it.

Women giving players all the action is a form of quite severe bullying. Sexual neglect of good behavior, is perhaps the most primal form of bullying that there is.

Somewhere in every mans subconscious is that manufactured consent rape is what makes women the happiest.

The psychological fallout from this is vast ...

One of the reasons for this is the immediate threat posed to consensual reality... it is a personal attack and threat on ones life.

Men react in a lot of different ways to this:

Homicidality
Suicidality
Or just shut up and manufacture the consent (rape women while they smile at you for it)
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby MagsJ » Sat Dec 08, 2018 10:47 pm

Ecmandu wrote:Also, a deeper truth about women is that they have something called the paradoxical effect or paradoxical aversion. There are no exceptions to this.. etc etc etc

Evidence, for your entire post?
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 17628
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby MagsJ » Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:09 pm

Ecmandu wrote:It's more nuanced than that MagsJ.. etc etc etc...
I don't agree with your view on this matter, but it is yours to have.. gleaned from your experiences, but it definitely does not apply across the board.. nuanced or not.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 17628
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby Ecmandu » Sat Dec 08, 2018 11:15 pm

MagsJ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:Also, a deeper truth about women is that they have something called the paradoxical effect or paradoxical aversion. There are no exceptions to this.. etc etc etc

Evidence for your entire post?


Well studies on female sexuality state it outright.

I posted one of them here... I'll look for it again.

This particular study defined sexual stratification as not the number of partners but as stratification of desirability.

Anyways, that's not really important.

We are energetic beings that act as magnets.

Since I am the holder of the 5,5,3 rule, all I need to do is observe how the psychic field treats me, to find out how the population as a whole is with respect to me.

This type of thing may be beyond your experience.

I can tell you for sure, that if there was one woman in the world who resonated with not having manufactured consent rape, she would have found a way to me even if she was in an aboriginal village of 12 people. That truly is how the world works.

Again, you may not have access to this dimension of reality.

I can prove that the 5,5,3 rule circumvents manufactured consent, and I can prove I'm the only person on earth using it.

The next one is harder to prove, but I can tell you this:

All of us are pan-psychic beings with energy resonances ....

A woman, would have figured out in their subconscious that I'd solve this problem in 2018, and she'd have been at my "metaphorical" doorstep 6 months ago. That's the way existence works, among other ways
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby Ecmandu » Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:02 am

Ecmandu wrote:
MagsJ wrote:
Ecmandu wrote:Also, a deeper truth about women is that they have something called the paradoxical effect or paradoxical aversion. There are no exceptions to this.. etc etc etc

Evidence for your entire post?


Well studies on female sexuality state it outright.

I posted one of them here... I'll look for it again.

This particular study defined sexual stratification as not the number of partners but as stratification of desirability.

Anyways, that's not really important.

We are energetic beings that act as magnets.

Since I am the holder of the 5,5,3 rule, all I need to do is observe how the psychic field treats me, to find out how the population as a whole is with respect to me.

This type of thing may be beyond your experience.

I can tell you for sure, that if there was one woman in the world who resonated with not having manufactured consent rape, she would have found a way to me even if she was in an aboriginal village of 12 people. That truly is how the world works.

Again, you may not have access to this dimension of reality.

I can prove that the 5,5,3 rule circumvents manufactured consent, and I can prove I'm the only person on earth using it.

The next one is harder to prove, but I can tell you this:

All of us are pan-psychic beings with energy resonances ....

A woman, would have figured out in their subconscious that I'd solve this problem in 2018, and she'd have been at my "metaphorical" doorstep 6 months ago. That's the way existence works, among other ways


To be thorough, this study specifically talks about the paradoxical effect that women have.

http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/do ... 1&type=pdf
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby Ecmandu » Sun Dec 09, 2018 4:46 pm

Please read above post.

What's awful about these studies is that they bend over backwards to try not to be controversial.

But there are codes.

Mentioning the paradoxical effect, and knowing that when men compete for deserving sex causes way more peace on earth than we currently have (which is not in the study), what the authors are really saying is that women blacklist the number one topic for the relative peace of a consent violating zero sum reality. Basically, women are wired biologically to be anti peace. War. But MagsJ wants no responsibility to fall upon all women, or herself, so she disagrees - with facts from social science.

That's why it's considered manufactured consent rape, because who in their right mind would want more war and consent violation when the options for otherwise are clear and logical?

From this perspective, women are understood to have extremely low cognitive ages, which is statutory rape.
Ecmandu
ILP Legend
 
Posts: 7443
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:22 am

Re: 5,5,3 rule

Postby MagsJ » Sun Dec 09, 2018 10:35 pm

Ecmandu wrote:We are energetic beings that act as magnets.

I know what we are.
The possibility of anything we can imagine existing is endless and infinite

--MagsJ
User avatar
MagsJ
The Londonist
 
Posts: 17628
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 2:59 pm
Location: London, NC1

Previous

Return to Society, Government, and Economics



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]