But seriously on a lighter note , simply, the answer is within the folds of existence, being and nothingness, which the Scholastics used to call essence.
That was a proverbial solution to being and nothingness , as itself a conditional approach as to why souls come in the guise of a god manifested as an evil genius, or a philosopher king.
If being and nothingness was all that was left out of the equation, then , it solidifies the presumption that the logic and not the king is gone, for sure
for the simple reason that differences differences came to be like film, spliced and filled in with stills, which sustained then superiority Parmenedes over Hericlatus; stillness over motion.
This difference , in spite of what they say, has to be reaffirmed at all costs, and this is where things go haywire , and nothingness excluded the act of the will, for men had finally and tacitly had to admit, moral justification byways of policy, whereby the black letter of the lawful evil, of a genius very far gone, needed a review of past structural ,past postmodern review.
Otherwise , people should conspire to revise it.-a loose rendition -
Barbarian don’t despite me for my obvious distaste for quick fixes for there may not be one. In fact ,it points to a possible state of no return.
Since things can not be further from the truth, the course toward entropy set not reversed, the conflation may be a strategic move in and out of the garbage pail.